Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:00:00.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Human Situation on Stage: Merce Cunningham, Theodor Adorno, and the Category of Expression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Extract

Where is expression in Cunningham's choreography? Are the moving bodies on stage expressive? If so, what are they expressing and how does such expression occur? Several of the finest theorists of dance—among them, Susan Leigh Foster, Mark Franko, and Dee Reynolds—have already approached the question of expressivity in the work of Merce Cunningham. Acknowledging the formalism and astringency of his choreography, they nonetheless insist that expression does indeed take place. Foster locates expression in the “affective significance” as opposed to the “emotional experience” of movement (1986, 38); Franko finds it in an “energy source … more fundamental than emotion, while just as differentiated” (1995, 80); and Reynolds identifies expression in the dancing subject's sensorimotor “faculties” as they are deployed “fully in the present” (2007, 169). Cunningham himself has defined expression in dance as an intrinsic and inevitable quality of movement, indicating that his search to capture, isolate, and frame this quality is central to his choreographic process. As a critical theorist (rather than a dance historian), I am interested in expression as a more general, or cross-media, category and therefore find the efforts by Cunningham and his critics to define expression differently, to free it from its subservience to the psyche, refreshing, unconventional, and suggestive. I have become increasingly convinced that Cunningham's practical and theoretical interventions can illuminate more traditional literary and philosophical discourses on the aesthetics of expression and that they have particular resonance when juxtaposed with the approach to expression developed by Theodor Adorno in his Aesthetic Theory of 1970. Similar to Cunningham, Adorno complicates the category of “expression” by shifting its location from subjectivity, understood primarily as a psychic phenomenon, to embodiment, understood as a function of locomotion and sensual existence (in Franko's words, “something more fundamental than emotion, while just as differentiated” [1995, 80]).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Adorno, Theodor W. 1970/1997. Aesthetic Theory, edited by Adorno, Gretel and Tiedemann, Rolf. Translated and introduced by Hullot-Kentor, Robert. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1986. “On the Mimetic Faculty.” Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writing, edited by Demetz, Peter, 333–36. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
Brown, Carolyn. 2007. Chance and Circumstance: Twenty Years with Cage and Cunningham. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Merce. 1951. Rehearsal Notes. Merce Cunningham Archives, Westbeth, New York City, New York.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Merce. 19521958. Rehearsal Notes. Merce Cunningham Archives, Westbeth, New York City, New York.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Merce. 1968. Changes: Notes on Choreography. Edited by Starr, Frances. New York: Something Else Press.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Merce. 1991. The Dancer and the Dance: Merce Cunningham in Conversation with Jacqueline Lesschaeve. New York: Marilyn Boyars.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio R. 1999. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1872/1965. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, Susan Leigh. 1986. Reading Dancing: Bodies and Subjects in Contemporary American Dance. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 1995. Dancing Modernism/Performing Politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gil, José. 2002. “The Dancer's Body.” In A Shock to Thought: Expression after Deleuze and Guattari, edited by Massumi, Brian, 117–27. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jeannerod, Marc. 2006. Motor Cognition: What Actions Tell the Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostelanetz, Richard. 1989. Esthetics Contemporary. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Kostelanetz, Richard, ed. 1998. Merce Cunningham: Dancing in Space and Time 1944–1992. New York: Da Capo.Google Scholar
LeDoux, Joseph. 2002. The Synaptic Self. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Manning, Susan A. 1993. Ecstasy and the Demon: Feminism and Nationalism in the Dances of Mary Wigman. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by Smith, Colin. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nicholls, David. 2007. John Cage. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Noland, Carrie. 2009. Agency and Embodiment: Performing Gestures/Producing Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Dee. 2007. Rhythmic Subjects: Uses of Energy in the Dances of Mary Wigman, Martha Graham, and Merce Cunningham. Hampshire, England: Dance Books.Google Scholar
Stern, Daniel. 1985/2000. The Interpersonal World of the Infant. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Tobias, Tobi. 1975. “Notes for a Piece on Cunningham.” Dance Magazine 42 (September).Google Scholar
Vaughan, David. 1997. Merce Cunningham: Fifty Years. Edited by Harris, Melissa. New York: Aperture.Google Scholar