Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T11:42:04.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

African Divisional Politics in the Cape Colony, 1884 to 1910

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Extract

African voters played an important part in many electoral divisions of the Cape Colony between 1884 and 1910. Traditional leaders, particularly headmen, exercised some influence, but declined in the period under review. Ministers of religion, school-teachers and others of the new strata created by colonial society were given a leading role, but in the absence of patronage they were limited to persuasion, and decisions on candidates to support were taken collectively, often at mass meetings that included a wider polity than those on the voters' roll. Ad hoc African electoral committees were formed to bring candidates to the notice of the politically conscious and to implement decisions once these were taken. White candidates established committees of their own and sometimes these overlapped with the African committees. African electoral agents employed by candidates played an important part in running a campaign. The network created by these African committees provided the basis for territory-wide organizations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cape Mercury, Kingwilliamstown, 9 07 1898.Google Scholar

2 Constitution Ordinance 1853, section 10.

3 Rhodes Papers, C 2B: The Capes 1896–1902, no. 233, Lenkwane, J. D. Patrick to Rhodes, C. J., 20 06 1900. On behalf of the Progressive Native Committee of Kimberley, Lenkwane wrote: ‘It is the entire desire of the Native here that W. W. Fynne, Esq., should represent us in the House of Assembly for the Victoria East constituency…. As preliminary steps in the matter we have already arranged with our brothers in the constituency and also with Mr Pool, the Chairman of the League, to forward our humble request to Hon. Sir G. Sprigg….’Google Scholar

4 Imvo, 27 07 1898: ‘Here are a number of young bloods—drawn anyhow from various quarters, and scarcely representing anybody but themselves, seeing they were scarcely elected by any meeting—met in serio-comic conclave to deal with the most intricate and weighty political situation which seems to elude the elect…’Google Scholar

5 Umtata Herald, 30 12 1903, quoting Izwi (the 1903 file of Izwi no longer exists). Izwi, 16 04 1907.Google Scholar

6 Cape of Good Hope, G. 4, 1883; Report and Proceedings of the Commission on Native Laws and Customs; Schapera, I. ed. The Bantu-speaking Tribes of South Africa; Schapera, I., Government and Politics in Tribal Society.Google Scholar

7 Cape of Good Hope, G. 4, 1883, Ibid. Appendix D. pp. 267, 280, 285, 297, 300, 312, 318. Referring to the factors operating against the acceptance of individual title, the Hon. Charles Brownlee stated: ‘Headmen of locations, who have a voice in distribution of arable land, lose the influence which this patronage gives them immediately individual title is issued. They have, therefore, in most cases been strong opponents to the measure.’ Appendix C, p. 67.

8 Cape of Good Hope, G. 4, 1883, Appendix D, p. 232, para 39.

9 Cape Colony, Office of the Attorney General, no. 156, February 27 1865.

10 Cape Mercury, 17 02 1879.Google Scholar

11 Cape of Good Hope, G. 4, 1883, pp. 341, 345, 474.

12 Queenstown Free Press, 9 August 1898; headman Klaas Makasi at Drivers, Drift. The Journal, 25 07 1898; headmen Danga and Nzinga at Grahamstown. Cape Times, 30 01 1904;Google Scholar headman Komani, Selbeko, Wodehouse. Cape Times, 9 02 1904;Google Scholar headman Adam, Toise at Seplem, Tembuland. Cape Mercury, 23 03 1908; headman Umhalala, Brownlee Station.Google Scholar

13 Merriman Papers, 1898: no. 113, John X. Merriman (JXM) to Agnes Merriman (AM), 19 August 1898; no. 119, JXM to AM, 23 August 1898.

14 Queenstown Free Press, 22 12 1893.Google Scholar

15 Rhodes Papers C. 2B, 1896–1902: no. 263, Louise Abrahamson to Rhodes, C. J., 19 05, 1901.Google Scholar

16 Merriman Papers, 1903: no. 199, Silberbauer, to JXM, 19 10 1903;Google Scholar no. 202, John, Alfred Shishuba to JXM, 19 10 1903;Google Scholar no. 308, John, Alfred Shisbuba to JXM, 30 12 1903.Google Scholar

17 Imvo, 17 12 1907.Google Scholar

18 Imvo, 5 11 1907.Google Scholar

19 Queenstown Free Press, 5 01 1894; Cape Mercury, 6 08 1898;Google ScholarImvo,24 12 1907.Google Scholar

20 Cape Times, 08 1893.Google Scholar

21 G. 46–1906, Cape of Good Hope, Blue Book on Native Affairs, 1905: Frank Brownlee Resident Magistrate, Mount Fletcher, 10 01 1906, p. 51.Google Scholar

22 Ibid: Robert, J. Crozier, Civil Commissioner, Wodehouse, 22 01 1906, p. 26.Google Scholar

23 Ibid: Tainton, L. G. H., Inspector, Keiskama Hoek, 3 01 1906, p. 15.Google Scholar

24 G. 12/1904, Cape of Good Hope, Blue Book on Native Affairs, 1904: Turner, H. Gordon, Inspector, Division of Herschel, 9 07 1904, p. 23.Google Scholar

25 South African Native Affairs Commission (SANAC), 1905, vol. II, para. 8733. Evidence of Richard Rose Innes.

26 South African News, 6 01 1904. On the chairman calling for a vote on the original motion, a large number stood in support. It was pointed out that a considerable percentage of these were non-voters, and Mr Baxter consented to act as a scrutineer. On all who were not voters being called upon to retire, some altercation took place between the respective parties. Merriman complained that at one meeting ‘there were only about to voters and a whole lot of other natives’ (Merriman Papers, 1903, no. 180: JXM to AM, 27 September 1903).Google Scholar

27 Imvo, 26 05 1885.Google Scholar

28 Imvo, 15 11 1893.Google Scholar

29 Imvo, 10 12 1907.Google Scholar

30 Merriman Papers, 1903, no. 156: Rev.Mzimba, P. J. to Rev. Dewdney, W. Drew, 1 09 1903.Google Scholar

31 Imvo, 24 12 1907.Google Scholar

32 Merriman Papers, 1903, 110. 159: J. P. Smith to JXM, ‘We must endeavour to get one of the men recommended by Mr Pelem as an agent in Ladyfrere.’

33 SANAC, vol. II, para. 8732.

34 Imvo, 26 05 1885.Google Scholar

35 Merriman Papers, 1903, no. 272: Harry, Neville to JXM, 31 12 1903.Google Scholar

36 Merriman Papers, 1903, no. 308: John, Alfred Shishuba to JXM, 19 12 1903.Google Scholar

37 Imvo, 11 10 1893.Google Scholar

38 Merriman Papers, 1903, no. 214: Pelem, J. M. to JXM, 33 10 1903.Google Scholar

39 Ibid. no. 284: Matyolo, C. P. to JXM, 9 12 1903.Google Scholar

40 Merriman Papers, 1898, no. 119: JXM to AM, 23 August 1898. Compare this to an earlier letter that Merriman wrote to his wife: ‘The other Bond candidate, Venter, came to me this morning and offered to withdraw if I would give him money to work for him! Of course I refused, and then afterwards he withdrew and is, I hear, going to work for Halse’ (Merriman Papers, no. 38: JXM to AM, 7 July 1898).

41 Merriman Papers, 1898, no. 97; JXM to AM, 33 August 1898.

42 Imvo, 11 10 1883.Google Scholar

43 SANAC, vol. 11, para. 8732.

44 Merriman Papers, 1898, no. 119: JXM to AM, 23 August 1898.

45 Merriman Papers, 1904, no. 50: JXM to AM, 2 February 1904.

46 Merriman Papers, 1903, no. 159a: William, Siyo to Smit, J. P., 3 09 1903.Google Scholar

47 Ibid. no. 202: John, A. Shishuba to JXM, 19 10 1903.Google Scholar

48 Ibid. no. 298: Zuba, H. to JXM, 14 12 1903.Google Scholar

49 Merriman Papers, 1903, no. 156: Rev., P. J. Mzimba to Rev., Dewdney Drew, 1 09 1903.Google Scholar

50 Merriman Papers, 1903, no. 285: Jolobe, J. to JXM, 9 12 1903.Google Scholar

51 Ibid. no. 214: Pelem, J. M. to JXM, 31 10 1903;Google Scholar and no. 264: Pelem, J. M. to JXM, n.d. 1903. It seems that constituents were best served by their members or prospective members in the last session before the dissolution of Parliament. Richard Rose Innes, thinking that his brother James would not be re-elected in his Cape Division seat because he would neither join the S.A.P. nor align himself with Rhodes, and would therefore need to seek election in Kingwilliamstown, wrote to him: ‘It is a pity with the General Election in view you were not a little more diplomatic and did not make a show of advocacy of frontier or border interests. Had you done this and put yourself out a little in this direction, you would have sailed in here…. ’The extent to which local issues took precedence over national affairs can be gauged from Richard Rose Innes's response to his brother's voting against a second dredger for East London. The prosperity of that port directly affected Kingwilliamstown, and he urged his brother to write to Jabavu: ‘You must explain your Dredger vote fully, and if possible explain it away….’ And, at Victoria East, in the seat that he had won with African support in 1884, this too was likely to be affected. ‘It is bound to stand in your way at Alice too…’ (Rose Innes Papers, 1898, no. 174: Richard Rose Innes to James Rose Innes, n.d.).Google Scholar

52 Merriman Papers, 1903, no. 159a: William, Siyo to JXM, 3 09 1903.Google Scholar

53 Merriman Papers, 1903, no. 202: John, A. Shishuba to JXM, 19 10 1903.Google Scholar Shishuba refers to the ‘lies and misrepresentation’ spread by the Progressives. Another correspondent of Merriman's, W. G. Potgieter, declared in a letter: ‘Man, you can't think what a lot of lies they are spreading about now.’ Merriman Papers, 193, no. 263, Potgieter, W. G. to JXM, 30 11 1903.Google Scholar In Uitenhage, the Progressive Party found it necessary to deny the rumour that one of their candidates was not a Progressive (Cape Daily Telegraph, 9 02 1904).Google Scholar

54 Merriman Papers, 1903, no. 292: Matyolo, C. P. to JXM, 12 12 1903.Google Scholar

55 Merriman Papers, 1904, no. 47: JXM to AM, 30 January 1904.

56 Merriman Papers, 1903, no. 197: Jabavu, J. Tengo to JXM, 17 10 1903.Google Scholar Jabavu had a similar reproach for two South African Party candidates ten days later, after the latter had held a meeting in Grahamstown which had been all but broken up. ‘If’, he wrote, ‘instead of attempting to convert the pledged opponents by public meeting they had called a meeting of their supporters and through it spoken to the hostile meeting, they might have avoided the profitless stirring up of rowdyism and race hatred which are ever latent in the jingo, a good might have been done’ (Imvo, 27 10 1903).Google Scholar

57 At one meeting, the Queenstown Free Press (9 08 1898) reported the 'appearance on the scene of the scholars from a neighbouring native girls’ school, who marched up in rank carrying a big Union Jack, singing “The Red, White and Blue”, the National Anthem, and other patriotic songs’.Google Scholar

58 In 1898, at a meeting in Queenstown, Shishuba accounted for every vote, on matters affecting Africans, given over the previous five years by Dr Berry, a local member who was seeking re-election (Queenstown Free Press, 16 08 1898).Google Scholar

59 Merriman Papers, 1903, no. 308: John, A. Shishuba to JXM, 12 12 1903.Google Scholar

60 Merriman Papers, 1903, no. 179: JXM to AM, 26 September 1903.

61 Javabu, a hostile witness has recorded, ‘fed his masters’ upon ‘flapdoodle, fabricating the mess out of imaginary votes of confidence for his masters’ delectation and leaving them to discover the real ingredients of the dish, at the bottom of the poll, when the result has been declared’ (Solomon, Tshekisho Plaatje, Native Life in South Africa Before and Since the European War and Boer Rebellion (London, 1916), p. 166).Google Scholar

62 Merriman Papers, no. 308: John, A. Shishuba to JXM, 12 12 1903.Google Scholar

63 Merriman Papers, 1898, no. 97: JXM to AM, 13 August 1898.

64 Merriman Papers, 1903, no. 175: JXM to AM, 29 September 1903.

65 Merriman Papers, 1903, no. 190: JXM to AM, 7 October 1903.

66 Merriman Papers, 1904, no. 47: JXM to AM, 30 January 1904.

67 Merriman Papers, 1903, no. 177: JXM to AM, 26 September 1903.

68 Merriman Papers, 1903, no 178: JXM to AM, 26 September 1903.

69 Merriman Papers, 1903, no. 100: JXM to AM, 27 September 1903.

70 Merriman Papers, 1903, no. 185: JXM to AM, 3 October 1903.

71 Sampson, V., Attorney-General, 19041908.Google Scholar

72 DrSmartt, T. W., Colonial Secretary, 0510 1898; Commissioner of Crown Lands and Public Works, 06 190005 1902, 02 190402 1908.Google Scholar

73 Graham, T. L., Attorney General, 0510 1898, 02 190202, 1906.Google Scholar

74 Sprigg, G. Gordon, Prime Minister, 02 187805 1881, 11 188607 1890, 01 189610 1898, 06 190002 1902.Google Scholar

75 Imvo, 20 September, 11 Oct. 1893. Cape Mercury, 18 August 1898. Imvo, 3 11 1903.Google ScholarEast London Dispatch, 2 02 1904. Meetings always ended with the singing of the National Anthem. T. L. Graham became so annoyed by a proposal to move a vote of no confidence that he began walking out of the hall. At this the meeting began singing the anthem. ‘Whereupon’, Imvo reported, ‘the Attorney General was compelled to return to the platform and join the patriotic strains.’Google Scholar

76 Umtata Herald, 23 Dec. 1903, reported C. C. Silberbauer and Molteno addressing a meeting at Askeaton which lasted eight hours. The South African News, 6 Jan. 1904, reported their holding a meeting at Cala which lasted six hours, whilst Merriman held a meeting at Macabeni which lasted four and a half hours (Merriman Papers, 1904, no. 51: JXM to AM, 3 February 1904).

77 James, Rose Innes, Autobiography (1949), 52.Google Scholar

78 Rodney, Davenport, ‘The Afrikaner Bond’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, 389,Google Scholar quoting Hofmeyr Papers, vol. VII (Queenstown folder), Hofmeyr to Plessis, M. J. du, 4 07, 1898.Google Scholar

79 Innes Papers, no. 184: Jones, C. T. to James Rose Innes, 20 07, 1898; no. 194:CTJ to JRI, 27 07 1898; no 195: CTJ to JRI, 28 07 1898.Google Scholar

80 Imvo, 10 03 1898;Google ScholarCape Argus, 27 07 1898, 7 08 1898;Google ScholarSomerset Budget,4 01 1904;Google ScholarIzwi, 1907; Imvo, 14 01 1908.Google Scholar

81 East London Daily Dispatch, 6 02 1904. But African voters were not the only ones who might need instruction in how to use a ballot, as this description, from the Cape Argus, 27 07 1898, of a meeting of German-speaking voters at Frankfort, Kingwilliamstown, clearly shows: ‘Before the meeting broke up, an interesting occurrence took place. Mr Birkenstein, chalk in hand, advanced to the big blackboard in the corner of the school room and drew a picture of the polling paper with the names of the candidates. One by one the voters present were instructed how to place the Xs against the names of Schermbrucher and Warren. Frankfort now thoroughly understand the mysteries of the ballot box.’Google Scholar