Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-26T19:05:51.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Insights from studying prejudice in the context of American atheists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2012

Eric P. Charles
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, Altoona, PA 16602. epc2@psu.eduhttp://www.charlespsychology.com
Nicholas J. Rowland
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University, Altoona, PA 16602. njr12@psu.eduhttp://www.sites.google.com/site/professorrowland/
Brooke Long
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242. blong21@kent.edufyarriso@kent.edu
Fritz Yarrison
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242. blong21@kent.edufyarriso@kent.edu

Abstract

Our research on non-religion supports the proposed shift toward more interactive models of prejudice. Being nonreligious is easily hideable and, increasingly, of low salience, leading to experiences not easily understood via traditional or contemporary frameworks for studying prejudice and prejudice reduction. This context affords new opportunity to observe reverse forms of interactive prejudice, which can interfere with prejudice reduction.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Edgell, P., Gertis, J. & Hartmann, D. (2006) Atheists as “Other”: Moral boundaries and cultural membership. American Sociological Review 71:211–34.Google Scholar
Kosmin, B. A. & Keysar, A. (2009) American religious identification survey, 2008: Summary report. Trinity College.Google Scholar
Rowland, N. J., Long, B. & Yarrison, F. (in press) “Imagined recursivity” and stigma management among American Atheists. In: Recursion in human systems, ed. Orozco, M. & Beckstead, Z.. Transaction Press.Google Scholar