Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:30:36.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Informal Regulation of Drones and the Formal Legal Regulation of War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2015

Janina Dill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Toward a Drone Accountability Regime
Information
Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , Spring 2015 , pp. 51 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States), Merits, 1986 ICJ Reports, p. 14 (Judgment of June 27, 1986), para. 195; Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), 2005 ICJ Reports, p. 168 (Judgment of December 19, 2005), para. 146; Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, 2004 ICJ Reports, p. 136 (Advisory Opinion of July 9, 2004), para. 139.

2 For the panoply of views, see, among others, Akande, Dapo and Liefländer, Thomas, “Clarifying Necessity, Imminence, and Proportionality in the Law of Self-Defence,” American Jounral of International Law 107, no. 3 (2013), pp. 563–70Google Scholar; Deeks, Ashley, “‘Unwilling or Unable’: Toward an Normative Framework for Extra-Territorial Self-Defense,” Virginia Journal of International Law 52, no. 3 (2012)Google Scholar, p. 483; Reinold, Theresa, “State Weakness, Irregular Warfare, and the Right to Self-Defense Post-9/11,” American Journal of International Law 105, no. 2 (2011), pp. 244–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tams, Christian J., “The Use of Force Against Terrorists,” European Journal of International Law 20, no. 2 (2009), pp. 359–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tladi, Dire, “The Nonconsenting Innocent State: The Problem with Bethlehem's Principle 12,” American Journal of International Law 107, no. 3 (2013), pp. 570–76Google Scholar.

3 Hmoud, Mahmoud, “Are New Principles Really Needed? The Potential of the Established Distinction Between Responsibility for Attacks by Nonstate Actors and the Law of Self-Defence,” American Journal of International Law 107, no. 3 (2013)Google Scholar, pp. 576.