Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T10:15:59.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Insufficiency of “Democracy by Coincidence”: A Response to Peter K. Enns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2015

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reflections Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ, and New York: Princeton University Press and the Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin and Page, Benjamin I.. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 564581.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., Bartels, Larry M., and Seawright, Jason. 2013. “Democracy and the Policy Preferences of Wealthy Americans.” Perspectives on Politics 11(1): 5173.Google Scholar
Sombart, Werner. 1906. Warum gibt es in den Vereinigten Staaten keinen Sozialismus? Tèubingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). Republished 1976 as Why Is There No Socialism in the United States?, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar