Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T14:39:32.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ISAAK RUBIN: HISTORIAN OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT DURING THE STALINIZATION OF SOCIAL SCIENCES IN SOVIET RUSSIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2015

Ivan Boldyrev  and
Martin Kragh
Ivan Boldyrev
Affiliation:
Witten/Herdecke University; National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, E-mail: ivan.boldyrev@uni-wh.de.
Martin Kragh
Affiliation:
Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies, Uppsala University; Institute for Business and Economic History Research, Stockholm School of Economics, E-mail: martin.kragh@ucrs.uu.se.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research within the history of economic thought has focused only little on the development of economics under dictatorship. This paper attempts to show how a country with a relatively large and internationally established community of social scientists in the 1920s, the Soviet Union, was subjected to repression. We tell this story through the case of Isaak Il’ich Rubin, a prominent Russian economist and historian of economic thought, who in the late 1920s was denounced by rival scholars and repressed by the political system. By focusing not only on his life and work, but also on that of his opponents and institutional clashes, we show how the decline of a social science tradition in Russia and the USSR as well as the Stalinization of Soviet social sciences emerged as a process over time. We analyze the complex interplay of ideas, scholars, and their institutional context, and conclude that subsequent repression was arbitrary, suggesting that no clear survival or career strategy existed in the Stalinist system, due to a situation of fundamental uncertainty.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 363 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexeev, Michael, Gaddy, Clifford, and Leitzel, Jim. 1992. “Economics in the Former Soviet Union.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 6 (2): 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allyn, Bruce. 1990. “Fact, Value, and Science.” In Graham, Loren, ed., Science and the Soviet Social Order. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 225–256.Google Scholar
Antonov-Ovseyenko, Anton. 1981. The Times of Stalin. Portrait of a Tyranny. New York: Harper Colophon Books.Google Scholar
Arthur, Christopher J. 2004. The New Dialectic and Marx’s Capital. Leiden, Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Åslund, Anders. 1987. “Gorbachev’s Economic Advisors.” Soviet Economy 3: 246–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, Roger. 2002. The Penguin History of Economics. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bailes, Kendall. 1974. “The Politics of Technology: Stalin and Technocratic Thinking among Soviet Engineers.” American Historical Review 79 (2): 445–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baran, Paul. 1944. “New Trends in Russian Economic Thinking?” American Economic Review 34 (4): 862–871.Google Scholar
Barnett, Vincent. 1995. “A Long Wave Goodbye: Kondrat’ev and the Conjuncture Institute, 1920–28.” Europe-Asia Studies 47 (3): 413–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Vincent. 1998. Kondratiev and the Dynamics of Economic Development: Long Cycles and Industrial Growth in Historical Context. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Vincent. 2004. “E. E. Slutsky: Mathematical Statistician, Economist, and Political Economist?” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 26 (1): 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Vincent. 2005. History of Russian Economic Thought. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barnett, Vincent. 2006. “Further Thoughts on Clarifying the Idea of Dissent: The Russian and Soviet Experience.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 28 (1): 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Vincent. 2008. “Russian Émigré Economists in the USA.” In Barnett, Vincent and Zweynert, Joachim, eds., Economics in Russia: Studies in Intellectual History. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, pp. 107–122.Google Scholar
Beecher, Jonathan, and Fomichev, Valerii. 2006. “French Socialism in Lenin’s and Stalin’s Moscow: David Riazanov and the French Archive of the Marx-Engels Institute.” Journal of Modern History 78 (1): 119–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrendt, Lutz Dieter. 1997. “Die Institute der Roten Professur: Kaderschmieden der sowjetischen Parteiintelligenz (1921–1938).” Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas, Neue Folge 45 (4): 597–621.Google Scholar
Bessonov, Sergei, and Kon, Alexander, eds. 1930. Rubinshchina ili marksizm? Protiv idealizma i metafiziki v politicheskoi ekonomii. Moscow-Leningrad: Gosizdatel’stvo.Google Scholar
Borilin, Boris. 1930. O sovetskoi ekonomike i teoreticheskikh oshibkakh N.I. Bukharina. Moscow-Leningrad: Gosizdatel’stvo.Google Scholar
Borilin, Boris, and [Lev] Leont’ev, Aleksei, eds. 1929. Protiv mekhanisticheskikh tendentsii v politicheskoi ekonomii. Moscow-Leningrad: Gosizdatel’stvo.Google Scholar
Byrnes, Robert. 1991. “Creating the Soviet Historical Profession, 1917–1934.” Slavic Review, 50 (2): 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciliga, Ante. 1938. Au pays du grand mensonge. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Coleman, William O. 2002. Economics and Its Enemies: Two Centuries of Anti-Economics. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David-Fox, Michael S. 1993. “Political Culture, Purges, and Proletarianization at the Institute of Red Professors, 1921–1929.” Russian Review 52 (1): 20–42.Google Scholar
Davies, Robert W. 1989. The Industrialization of Soviet Russia. Volume 3, The Soviet Economy in Turmoil, 1929–1930. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Deborin, Abram, ed. 1930. Na boevom postu. Sbornik k shestidesyatiletiyu D. B. Riazanova. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo.Google Scholar
Deborin, Abram, 2009. “Vospominaniya akademika A.M. Deborina.” Voprosy filosofii 2: 113–133.Google Scholar
Demidov, Sergei, and Levshin, Boris, eds. 1999. Delo akademika Nikolaya Nikolaevicha Luzina. Saint-Petersburg: RKhGI.Google Scholar
Faccarello, Gilbert. 1983. “La loi de la valeur et le problème de la coordination des activités économiques.” L'homme et la société 67–68: 153–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Sheila. 1999. Everyday Stalinism: Ordinary Life in Extraordinary Times: Soviet Russia in the 1930s. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno, and Pommerehne, Werner. 1988. “The American Domination Among Eminent Economists.” Scientometrics 14 (1–2): 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galili, Ziva, and Nenarokov, Albert, eds. 2004. Men’sheviki v bolshevistskoi Rossii: 1918–1924. Men’sheviki v. 1922–1924 gg. Moscow: Rosspen.Google Scholar
Gerovitch, Slava. 1996. “Perestroika of the History of Technology and Science in the USSR: Changes in the Discourse.” Technology and Culture 37 (1): 102–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Loren. 1973. Science and Philosophy in the Soviet Union. London: Lane.Google Scholar
Graham, Loren. 1993. Science in Russia and the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, Paul. 2009. Terror by Quota: State Security from Lenin to Stalin (an Archival Study). New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurvich, Emma B. 2010. Vzglyad v nastoyashee proshloe. Fragmenty semeinoi khroniki Nikolaya Ivanovicha Bukharina. Moscow: AIRO-XXI.Google Scholar
Hagemann, Harald. 2011. “European Émigrés and the ‘Americanization’ of Economics.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 18 (5): 643–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilferding, Rudolf. 1905. “Zur Problemstellung der theoretischen Ökonomie bei Karl Marx.“ Neue Zeit 1 (4): 101–112.Google Scholar
Holmes, Walter M. 1931. The Wreckers Exposed in the Trial of the Counter-Revolutionary Industrial Party: Describing the Moscow Trial. New York: Workers’ Library.Google Scholar
Jasny, Naum. 1954. “A Soviet Planner—V.G. Groman.” Russian Review 13 (1): 52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasny, Naum. 1972. Soviet Economists of the Twenties. Names to be Remembered. London and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joravsky, David. 1961. Soviet Marxism and Natural Science, 1917–1932. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josephson, Paul. 1988. “Physics, Stalinist Politics of Science and Cultural Revolution.” Soviet Studies 15 (2): 245–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khaustov, Vladimir, et al, eds. 2003. Lubyanka. Stalin i VChK-GPU-OGPU-NKVD. Yanvar’ 1922–dekabr’ 1936. Dokumenty. Moscow: MFD.Google Scholar
Kon, Alexander F. 1928. Kurs politicheskoi ekonomii. Moscow: Gosizdat.Google Scholar
Kozlova, Larissa A. 1994. “Institut krasnoi professury (1921–1938 gody): Istoriograficheskii ocherk.” Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal 1: 96–112.Google Scholar
Lange, Oscar. 1945. “Marxian Economics in the Soviet Union.” American Economic Review 35 (1): 127–133.Google Scholar
Lenin, Vladimir I. 1996. The Unknown Lenin: From the Secret Archive. Edited by Pipes, Richard. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, Robert. 2010. Von Neumann, Morgenstern, and the Creation of Game Theory: From Chess to Social Science, 1900–1960. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leontief, Wassily. 1960. “The Decline and Rise of Soviet Economic Science.” Foreign Affairs 38 (2): 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leont’ev, Aleksei [Lev]. 1931. Kapitalizm i sotsializm: Nachal’nii kurs politicheskoi ekonomiki: Uchebnik dlia vechernikh sovpartshkol i predmetnikh kruzhkov. Moscow, Leningrad: Moskovskii rabochii.Google Scholar
Leont’ev, Aleksei [Lev]. et al. 1944. “Teaching of Economics in the Soviet Union.” American Economic Review 34 (3): 501–530.Google Scholar
Levin, Aleksey. 1988. “Expedient Catastrophe: A Reconsideration of the 1929 Crisis at the Soviet Academy of Sciences.” Slavic Review 47 (2): 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebich, André. 1997. From the Other Shore: Russian Social Democracy after 1921. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Likitkijsomboon, Pichit. 1995. “Marxian Theories of Value-Form.” Review of Radical Political Economics 27 (2): 73–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litvin, Alter L., ed. 1999. Men’shevistskii protsess 1931 goda. Two volumes. Moscow: ROSSPEN.Google Scholar
Manevich, Vitaly E. 1991. “Stalinizm i politicheskaya ekonomiya.” In Repressirovannaya nauka. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 181–198.Google Scholar
Medvedev, Roy. 1971. Let History Judge. The Origins and Consequences of Stalinism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Mel’nik, Denis V. 2011. “Mezhdu ‘mekhanicismom’ i ‘idealismom’: I. I. Rubin i sovetskaya politekonomiya.” In Teoreticheskoe Nasledie I.I.Rubina I Sud’by Politicheskoy Ekonomii. Moscow: Institute of Economics RAS, pp. 60–77.Google Scholar
Miliutin, Vladimir. 1930. Kondrat’evshchina. Moscow: Izd. Kommun. Akad.Google Scholar
Nechkina, Militsa V. 2004. “Iz ‘delovykh dnevnikov’ 1922–1923 gg. akademika M. V. Nechkinoi.” Otechestvennye arkhivy 6: 91–124.Google Scholar
Neusüss-Fögen, Annette. 1973. “Einleitung.” In Iljitsch Rubin, Isaak, ed., Studien zur Marxschen Werttheorie. Frankfurt am Main: Europäische Verlagsanstalt, pp. 7–30.Google Scholar
Nove, Alec. 1991. The Economics of Feasible Socialism Revisited. Second edition. London: Harper Collins Academic.Google Scholar
Owen, Thomas. 2009. “The Death of a Soviet Science: Sergei Pervushin and Economic Cycles in Russia, 1850–1930.” Slavic Review 68 (2): 221–239.Google Scholar
Petry, Franz. 1916. Der soziale Gehalt der Marxschen Werttheorie. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Poletayev, Andrei V. 2010. “K voprosu o rossiyskom vklade v mirovuyu ekonomisheskuyu nauku.” In Axer, Jerzy and Savelyeva, Irina, eds., Natsionalnaya gumanitarnaya nauka v mirovom kontekste. Moscow: Higher School of Economics, pp. 310–342.Google Scholar
Pollock, Ethan. 2006. Stalin and the Soviet Science Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramzin, Leonid. 1931. Wreckers on Trial; A Record of the Trial of the Industrial Party Held in Moscow, Nov.–Dec., 1930. New York: Workers’ Library.Google Scholar
Rokityansky, Yakov G. 1994. “Poslednie dni professora I.I.Rubina. Po materialam sledstvennogo dela.” Herald of Russian Academy of Sciences 64 (9): 828–834.Google Scholar
Rokityansky, Yakov G., and Müller, Reinhard. 1996. Krasniy dissident. Akademik Ryazynov— opponent Lenina, zhertva Stalina. Moscow: Academia.Google Scholar
Rubin, Isaak I. 1972. Essays on Marx’s Theory of Value. Detroit: Black and Red.Google Scholar
Rubin, Isaak I. 1978. “Abstract Labor and Value in Marx’s System.” Capital & Class 2 (2): 107–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Isaak I. 1979. A History of Economic Thought. London: Ink Links.Google Scholar
Saad-Filho, Alfredo. 2002. The Value of Marx. Political Economy for Contemporary Capitalism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Serge, Viktor. 1963. Memoirs of a Revolutionary: 1901–1941. Translated from the French. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shabs, Semyon S. 1928. Problema obshchestvennogo truda v ekonomicheskoi sisteme Marksa. Moscow: Gosizdatel’stvo.Google Scholar
Shirokorad, Leonid. 2010. “Vliyanie ideologii na razvitie politicheskoy ekonomii v SSSR v. 1920—1930-e gody.” Herald of the SPb University, Series 5 (1): 77–81.Google Scholar
Shirokorad, Leonid, and Zweynert, Joachim. 2012. “Izrail G. Blyumin—The Fate of a Soviet Historian of Economic Thought under Stalin.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 19 (4): 653–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smirnova, Valentina A. 1989. ”Pervii direktor Instituta K. Marksa i F. Engel’sa D.B. Riazanov.” Voprosy istorii KPSS 9: 71–84.Google Scholar
Stalin, Joseph. [1931] 1954a. “New Conditions—New Tasks in Economic Construction.” In Works. Volume 13. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, pp. 53–82.Google Scholar
Stalin, Joseph. [1930] 1954b. “Reply to the Sverdlov Comrades.” In Works. Volume 12. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, pp. 190–196.Google Scholar
Starosta, Guido, and Kicillof, Axel. 2007. “On Materiality and Social Form: A Political Critique of Rubin’s Value-Form Theory.” Historical Materialism 15: 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutela, Pekka. 2008. “Soviet Economics after Stalin: Between Orthodoxy and Reform.” In Barnett, Vincent and Zweynert, Joachim, eds., Economics in Russia: Studies in Intellectual History. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, pp. 157–172.Google Scholar
Treml, Vladimir. 2003. “Western Analysis and the Soviet Policymaking Process.” In Haines, Gerald K. and Leggett, Robert E., eds., Watching the Bear: Essays on CIA’s Analysis of the Soviet Union. Langley, VA: Center for the Study of Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency, pp. 187–228.Google Scholar
Vasina, Ljudmila. 1994. “I. I. Rubin—Marxforscher und Politökonom.” In Beiträge zur Marx-Engels-Forschung. Neue Folge, Bd. 4. Hamburg: Argument, pp. 144–149.Google Scholar
Vasina, Ljudmila. 2011. “I.I.Rubin i ego rukopis’ ‘Ocherki po teorii deneg Marksa.’” In Ananyin, Oleg, et al., eds., Istoki. Sotsiokulturnaya sreda ekonomicheskoi deyatelnosti i ekonomicheskogo poznaniya. Moscow: Higher School of Economics, pp. 488–491.Google Scholar
Vasina, Liudmila, and Rokityansky, Yakov. 1992. “Stranitsy zhizni i tvorchestva ekonomista I.I. Rubina.” Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences 8: 129–144.Google Scholar
Wiles, Peter. 1952. “Soviet Economics.” Soviet Studies 4 (2): 133–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar