Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T11:27:52.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Five Laws of Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2015

Alfred G. Cuzán
Alfred G. Cuzán*
Affiliation:
The University of West Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Drawing on more than 500 elections from around the world, this article presents five empirical laws of politics. Four of these laws span democracies and dictatorships, and one sets a boundary between the two. In both regimes the governing party or coalition represents a minority of the electorate. In democracies this minority usually represents a plurality that amounts to about one third of the electorate. Judging by the outcome of the first free elections in regimes undergoing a transition, there is reason to believe that in dictatorships the minority is much smaller. Even as they have an advantage over the opposition, the incumbents experience an erosion of support over time. In democracies this leads to alternation in office, which in turn ensures that across many elections about two-thirds of the electorate gets to see its favorite party or coalition in government from time to time. In dictatorships, during long periods in office, support for the ruling party shrinks to insignificance. Also in democracies, it is rare for incumbents to receive more than 60 percent of the vote, and it never happens twice within the same spell in government. This appears to be a reliable indicator that differentiates all democracies from most dictatorships. The conclusion is inescapable—the dictatorial “passion for unanimity” and illusion of “organic unity” notwithstanding, the state is a plurality. The will of the electorate emerges as a result of competition among political parties.

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , July 2015 , pp. 415 - 419
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brians, Craig Leonard. 2014. “Three General Laws of Politics and Government in America (with Apologies to Sir Isaac Newton).” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (1): 125–30.Google Scholar
Brown, Adam R. 2011. “Wikipedia as a Data Source for Political Scientists: Accuracy and Completeness of Coverage.” PS: Political Science and Politics 44 (2): 339–43.Google Scholar
Budge, Ian, Keman, Hans, McDonald, Michael D., and Pennings, Paul. 2012. Organizing Democratic Choice: Party Representation over Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davenport, Christian. 2007. “State Repression and Political Order.” Annual Review of Political Science 10: 1–23.Google Scholar
Davies, Norman. 2005. God’s Playground: A History of Poland. Volume III: 1795 to the Present. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
de Mesquita, Bruce Bueno, and Smith, Alistair. 2012. “Domestic Explanations of International Relations.” Annual Review of Political Science 15: 161–81.Google Scholar
Feynman, Richard P. 1995. Six Easy Pieces: Essentials of Physics Explained by Its Most Brilliant Teacher. Pasadena: California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara, Wright, Joseph, and Frantz, Erica. 2014. “Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (2): 313–41.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas A. 2000. “Bread and Peace Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections.” Public Choice 104: 149–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jowett, B. 1885. The Politics of Aristotle, Volume I. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. 2013/1929. The Essence and Value of Democracy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1997. “Back to Democratic Basics: Who Really Practices Majority Rule?” In Democracy’s Victory and Crisis, Nobel Symposium No. 93, ed. Hadenius, Axel, 143–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, Michael D., and Budge, Ian. 2005. Elections, Parties, and Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nannestad, Peter, and Paldam, Martin. 1999. “The Cost of Ruling: A Foundation Stone for Two Theories.” University of Aarhus Department of Economics, Working Paper No. 1999-9. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=165709.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 2009. “Self-Government in Our Time.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 71–92.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wittfogel, Karl. 1957. Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar