Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T17:34:35.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

JUSTICE AND IDENTITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2014

Amartya Sen
Amartya Sen*
Affiliation:
Harvard University, USAasen@fas.harvard.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper discusses the relationship between justice and identity. While it is widely agreed that justice requires us to go beyond loyalty to our simplest identity – being just oneself – there is less common ground on how far we must go beyond self-centredness. How relevant are group identities to the requirements of justice, or must we transcend those too? The author draws attention to the trap of confinement to nationality and citizenship in determining the requirements of justice, particularly under the social-contract approach, and also to the danger of exclusive concentration on some other identity such as religion and race. He concludes that it is critically important to pay attention to every human being's multiple identities related to the different groups to which a person belongs; the priorities have to be chosen by reason, rather than any single identity being imposed on a person on grounds of some extrinsic precedence. Justice is closely linked with the pursuit of impartiality, but that pursuit has to be open rather than closed, resisting closure through nationality or ethnicity or any other allegedly all-conquering single identity. Christian List

Type
Articles
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 30 , Issue 1: ‘Themes from the Work of Amartya Sen: Identity, Rationality, and Justice’ , March 2014 , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Hume, D. 2006. Moral Philosophy, ed. Sayre-McCord, G.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 2005. The problem of global justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33: 113–147.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. 1989. Realizing Rawls. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999a [1971]. A Theory of Justice, revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999b. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1976 [1776]. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, ed. Cannan, E.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 2002 [1759]. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, ed. Haakonssen, K.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar