Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:09:48.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Speaker's Task Force in the Post-Reform House of Representatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Barbara Sinclair
Barbara Sinclair*
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Because of changes in the issues at the center of controversy, changes in rules and norms and high membership turnover, the current House majority party leaders operate in a much less predictable environment than their predecessors did. In response to the changed environment, Speaker O'Neill has developed the strategy of leadership by inclusion, a central element of which is the Speaker's task force, an ad hoc group appointed by the Speaker and charged with passage of a specific bill. The leaders believe task forces help them perform both of their primary functions—building winning coalitions and “keeping peace in the family.” By increasing the number of people working in an organized way to pass the bill at issue, the task force increases the probability of a bill's success on the floor. Work on a task force satisfies junior members' expectations of participation and fosters cooperative patterns of behavior among party members.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , June 1981 , pp. 397 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibby, John F., Mann, Thomas E. and Ornstein, Norman J. (1980). Vital Statistics on Congress, 1980. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, December 16, 1978, pp. 3450-51; May 12, 1979, pp. 877-78.Google Scholar
Cooper, Joseph, and Brady, David W. (1980). “Institutional Context and Leadership Style: The House From Cannon to Rayburn.” Presented at the Conference on Understanding Congressional Leadership: The State of the Art, sponsored by the Dirksen Center and the Sam Rayburn Library. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Dodd, Lawrence, and Oppenheimer, Bruce, eds. (1977). Congress Reconsidered. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles O. (1968). “Joseph G. Cannon and Howard W. Smith: An Essay on the Limits of Leadership in the House of Representatives.” Journal of Politics 30: 617-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Charles O. (1980). “House Leadership in an Age of Reform.” Presented at the Conference on Understanding Congressional Leadership: The State of the Art, sponsored by the Dirksen Center and the Sam Rayburn Library. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
New York Times, June 4, 1979, Sec. D, p. 10.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Norman, ed. (1975). Congress in Charge. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Peabody, Robert L. (1976). Leadership in Congress. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Ripley, Randall B. (1967). Party Leaders in the House of Representatives. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Ripley, Randall B. (1969). Majority Party Leadership in Congress. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara (1981). “Coping with Uncertainty: Building Coalitions in the House and Senate.” In Mann, Thomas and Ornstein, Norman (eds.), The New Congress. Washington, D.C: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar