Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T21:51:06.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regions, Regionalism and Regional Differences in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2013

Christopher Cochrane  and
Andrea Perrella
Christopher Cochrane*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Andrea Perrella*
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
*
Christopher Cochrane, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall, Room 3018, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G3, christopher.cochrane@utoronto.ca
Andrea Perrella, Department of Political Science, Wilfrid Laurier University, Alvin Woods Building, Rm 4-120, 75 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3C5, aperrella@wlu.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. This article contests the concepts of “region” and “regionalism” in Canadian political science. There is widespread agreement among observers of politics in Canada that the country is divided in politically consequential ways along regional lines. There is little agreement, however, about what causes these regional divisions or, indeed, about where the lines of regional division should be drawn. As a result, rival explanations for regional differences in Canada are commonly tested against different evidence arising from different definitions of region. This article argues that “region” should be conceptualized in generalizable terms as the physical space that surrounds an individual, and that “regionalism” should be conceptualized as an affective attachment to the people, places and institutions within a geographic area. Regionalism, from this perspective, is a concept that plays an important role in driving regional differences in opinion differences rather than simply describing these differences. The article applies this argument to a study of regional differences in Canadian opinions about government involvement in the economy. The empirical analysis points to the need for the development of concepts that can be generalized across explanations and levels of analysis. Even on the single issue analyzed here, regional differences appeared to have different causes in different regions, and these different causes seemed to operate at different levels of analysis.

Résumé. Cet article questionne le bien-fondé des concepts de “région” et de “régionalisme” tels qu'utilisés dans la littérature en science politique au Canada . La plupart des politologues s'entendent pour souligner l'importance des clivages régionaux dans la politique canadienne. Par contre, on s'entend moins sur l'identification des sources de ces divisions régionales, ainsi que sur la délimitation de ces différentes régions. Par conséquent, les études scientifiques des facteurs possibles qui sous-tendent les clivages régionaux sont souvent difficile a comparé puisqu'elles utilisent différentes définitions du concept de “région”. Cet article défend l'idée que le concept de “région” devrait être limité à décrire l'espace physique où se situe un individu. Par ailleurs le concept de “régionalisme” devrait inclure l'idée d'un attachement affectif aux personnes, endroits et institutions d'un emplacement géographique donné. Le régionalisme, dans cette perspective, doit être compris comme une cause des clivages régionaux, et non comme une simple description de ces différences. Cet article propose l'utilisation de cette distinction conceptuelle à une étude des différences régionales quant à l'opinion publique sur le rôle que devrait avoir le gouvernement dans l'économie. L'analyse empirique démontre l'importance de développer des concepts qui peuvent être généralisés au point de s'appliquer à différentes explications et niveaux d'analyse. Si on se fie au seul enjeu étudié dans cet article, les clivages régionaux semblent avoir différentes causes dans chacune des régions, et ces causes semblent opérer à différents niveaux d'analyse.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 829 - 853
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albright, Jeremy J., and Marinova, Dani M.. 2010. “Estimating Multilevel Models using SPSS, Stata, SAS, and R.” Retrieved from http://www.iub.edu/~statmath/stat/all/hlm/hlm.pdf.Google Scholar
Anderson, Cameron. 2010. “Regional Heterogeneity and Policy Preferences in Canada: 1979–2006.” Regional and Federal Studies 20: 447–68.Google Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, Adams, Alex N., Bryant, Lisa A., Zilberman, Luciana and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2011. “Considering Mixed Mode Surveys for Questions in Political Behavior: Using the Internet and Mail to Get Quality Data at Reasonable Costs.” Political Behavior 33: 161–78.Google Scholar
Bell, David. 1992. The Roots of Disunity. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bilodeau, Antoine, White, Stephen and Nevitte, Neil. 2010. “The Development of Dual Loyalties: Immigrants' Integration to Regional Canadian Dynamics.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 43: 515–44.Google Scholar
Blake, Donald. 1972. “The Measurement of Regionalism in Canadian Voting Patterns.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 5: 55–81.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1958. “Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Threat.” Pacific Sociological Review 1 (1): 3–7.Google Scholar
Borges, Walter and Clarke, Harold D.. 2008. “Cues in Context: Analyzing the Heuristics of Referendum Voting with an Internet Survey Experiment.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 18: 433–48.Google Scholar
Brodie, Janine. 1990. The Political Economy of Canadian Regionalism. Toronto: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Brym, Robert J. 1986. “Introduction.” In Regionalism in Canada, ed. Brym, Robert. Richmond Hill ON: Irwin Publishing.Google Scholar
Cameron, David R. and Krikorian, Jacqueline D.. 2002. “The Study of Federalism, 1960–99: A Content Review of Several Leading Canadian Academic Journals.” Canadian Public Administration 45: 328–63.Google Scholar
Careless, J.M.S. 1969. “Limited Identities in Canada.” Canadian Historical Review 50: 1–10.Google Scholar
Chang, Linchiat and Krosnick, Jon A.. 2009. “National Surveys via RDD Telephone Interviewing versus the Internet: Comparing Sample Representativeness and Response Quality.” Public Opinion Quarterly 73: 641–78.Google Scholar
Cutler, Fred. 2002. “Local Economies, Local Policy Impacts and Federal Electoral Behaviour in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 35: 347–82.Google Scholar
Cutler, Fred. 2007. “Context and Attitude Formation: Social Interaction, Default Information or Local Interests?” Political Geography 26: 575–600.Google Scholar
Elkins, David J. and Simeon, Richard. 1979. “A Cause in Search of its Effect, or What Does Political Culture Explain?” Comparative Politics 11: 127–45.Google Scholar
Elkins, David J. and Simeon, Richard. 1980. Small Worlds: Provinces and Parties in Canadian Political Life. Toronto: Methuen.Google Scholar
Gibbins, Roger. 1980. Prairie Politics and Society: Regionalism in Decline. Scarborough: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Blais, André, Nadeau, Richard and Nevitte, Neil. 1999. “Making Sense of Regional Voting in the 1997 Canadian Federal Election: Liberal and Reform Support Outside Quebec.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 32: 247–72.Google Scholar
Godbout, Jean-François and Belanger, Éric. 2002. “La Dimension Régionale de Vote Économique Canadien aux Élections Fédérales de 1988 à 2000.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 35: 567–88.Google Scholar
Henderson, Ailsa. 2004. “Regional Political Cultures in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 37: 595–615.Google Scholar
Henderson, Ailsa. 2010. “‘Small Worlds’ as Predictors of General Political Attitudes.” Regional and Federal Studies 20: 469–85.Google Scholar
Hodgetts, J. E. 1966. “Regional Interests and Policy in a Federal Structure.” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 32: 3–14.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert. 2001. “The Social Communication of Political Expertise.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 425–38.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert and Sprague, John. 1987. “Networks in Context: The Social Flow of Political Information.” The American Political Science Review 81: 1197–16.Google Scholar
Innis, Harold. 1930. The Fur Trade in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Ipsos Reid. 2008. Federal Election Survey. Data archived, distributed, and publicly available from the Laurier Institute for the Study of Public Opinion and Policy (www.lispop.ca).Google Scholar
Keating, Michael. 1998. The New Regionalism in Western Europe: Territorial Restructuring and Political Change. Northhampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Laselva, Samuel. 1996. The Moral Foundations of Canadian Federalism: Paradoxes, Achievements, and Tragedies of Nationhood. Montreal: McGill–Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Malhotra, Neil and Krosnick, Jon A.. 2007. “The Effect of Survey Mode and Sampling on Inferences about Political Attitudes and Behavior: Comparing the 2000 and 2004 ANES to Internet Surveys with Nonprobability Sample.” Political Analysis 15: 286–323.Google Scholar
Matthews, Ralph. 1983. The Creation of Regional Dependency. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Noel, S.J.R. 1971. “Consociational Democracy and Canadian Federalism.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 4: 15–18.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Michael D. and Stevenson, H. Michael. 1999. Politics and Ideology in Canada: Elite and Public Opinion in the Transformation of a Welfare State. Montreal: McGill–Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Michael D., Stevenson, H. Michael and Williams, A. Paul. 1980. “Region, Class and Political Culture in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 13: 227–71.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam and Teune, Henry. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Quillian, Lincoln. 1995. “Prejudice as a Response to perceived Group Threat: Population Composition and Anti-Immigrant and Racial Prejudice in Europe.” American Sociological Review 60 (4): 586–611.Google Scholar
Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia and Skrondal, Anders. 2008. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata, 2nd ed. College Station TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, David, Clarke, Harold D., Stewart, Marianne C. and Whiteley, Paul. 2007. “Does Mode Matter for Modeling Political Choice? Evidence from the 2005 British Election Study.” Political Analysis 15: 257–86.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Mildred A. 1974. Politics and Territory: The Sociology of Regional Persistence in Canada. Montreal: McGill–Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Simeon, Richard. 1977. “Regionalism and Canadian Political Institutions.” In Canadian Federalism: Myth or Reality? ed. Meekison, J. Peter. 3rd ed.. Toronto: Methuen.Google Scholar
Simeon, Richard and Elkins, David J.. 1974. “Regional Political Cultures in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 7: 397–437.Google Scholar
Smiley, Donald V. 1971. “The Structural Problem of Canadian Federalism.” Canadian Public Administration 14: 326–43.Google Scholar
Snijders, Tom A.B. and Bosker, Roel J.. 2012. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2006. Census of Canada, Federal Electoral District Profiles, Catalogue no. 92-595-XWE.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Laura and Crête, Jean. 2011. “A Comparison of Internet and Telephone Surveys for Studying Political Behavior.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 23: 24–55.Google Scholar
Wilson, John. 1974. “The Canadian Political Cultures: Towards a Redefinition of the Nature of the Canadian Political System.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 7: 438–83.Google Scholar
Wiseman, Nelson. 2007. In Search of Canadian Political Culture. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar