Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T21:17:22.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES: Building Green Infrastructure via Citizen Participation: A Six-Year Study in the Shepherd Creek (Ohio)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2012

Audrey L. Mayer*
Affiliation:
School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science & Department of Social Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan
William D. Shuster
Affiliation:
United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio
Jake J. Beaulieu
Affiliation:
US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio
Matthew E. Hopton
Affiliation:
US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio
Lee K. Rhea
Affiliation:
US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio
Allison H. Roy
Affiliation:
Kutztown University, Department of Biology, Kutztown, Pennsylvania, US Geological Survey, Massachusetts Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts
Hale W. Thurston
Affiliation:
US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio
*
Audrey L. Mayer, Michigan Technological University, School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science & Department of Social Sciences, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931; (phone) 1-906-487-3448; (e-mail) almayer@mtu.edu
Get access

Abstract

Green infrastructure at the parcel scale provides critical ecosystem goods and services when these services (such as flood mitigation) must be provided locally. Here we report on an approach that encourages suburban landowners to mitigate impervious surfaces on their properties through a voluntary auction mechanism. We used an economic incentive to place rain gardens and rain barrels onto parcels in a 1.8-km2 watershed near Cincinnati, Ohio. A comprehensive hydrologic, water-quality, and ecological monitoring campaign documented environmental conditions before and after treatment. In 2007 and 2008, we engaged private landowners through a reverse auction to encourage placement of one rain garden and up to four rain barrels on their property. The program led to the installation of 83 rain gardens and 176 rain barrels onto more than 20% of the properties, and preliminary analyses indicate that the overall discharge regime was altered by the treatments. The length of the study (six years) may have precluded observation of treatment effects on water quality and aquatic biological communities, as we would expect these conditions to respond more slowly to management changes. These distributed storm-water installations contributed to ecosystem services such as flood protection, water supply, and water infiltration; provided benefits to the local residents; and reduced the need for larger, expensive, centralized retrofits (such as deep tunnel storage).

Environmental Practice 14:57–67 (2012)

Type
Features
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ab Razak, I.A., and Christensen, E.R.. 2001. Water Quality before and after Deep Tunnel Operation in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Water Research 35(11):26832692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altor, A. 2010. Green Roofing in Indiana: Case Studies and Design Notes. Journal of Green Building 5(3):5068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angier, J.T., and McCarty, G.W.. 2008. Variations in Base-flow Nitrate Flux in a First-Order Stream and Riparian Zone. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 44(2):367380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardenheier, B.H. 2009. PROC MIXED: Macro to Assess Fixed and Random Effects for Significance Using the Likelihood Ratio Test and the Approximate Mixture Method. Paper SC-013. In SAS Conference Proceedings: Southeast SAS Users Group, Birmingham, Alabama, October 25–27, 2009. SAS Institute Users Group International (SUGI), Cary, NC, 7 pp. Available at http://analytics.ncsu.edu/sesug/2009/SC013.Bardenheier.pdf (accessed February 12, 2012).Google Scholar
Bernot, M.J., Sobota, D.J., Hall, R.O. Jr., Mulholland, P.J., Dodds, W.K., Webster, J.R., Tank, J.L., Ashkenas, L.R., Cooper, L.W., Dahm, C.N., Gregory, S.V., Grimm, N.B., Hamilton, S.K., Johnson, S.L., McDowell, W.H., Meyer, J.L., Peterson, B., Poole, G.C., Valett, H.M., Arango, C., Beaulieu, J.J., Burgin, A.J., Crenshaw, C., Helton, A.M., Johnson, L., Merriam, J., Niederlehner, B.R., O'Brien, J.M., Potter, J.D., Sheibley, R.W., Thomas, S.M., Wilson, K.. 2010. Inter-regional Comparison of Land-Use Effects on Stream Metabolism. Freshwater Biology 55(9):18741890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box, G.E.P., Jenkins, G.M., and Reinsel, G.C.. 1994. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Prentice Hall, Englewood, NJ, 598 pp.Google Scholar
Brabec, E., Schulte, S., and Richards, P.L.. 2002. Impervious Surfaces and Water Quality: A Review of Current Literature and Its Implications for Watershed Planning. Journal of Planning Literature 16(4):499514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunn, S.E., and Davies, P.M.. 2000. Biological Processes in Running Waters and Their Implications for the Assessment of Ecological Integrity. Hydrobiologia 422423:6170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colón-Gaud, C., Whiles, M.R., Brenes, R., Kilham, S.S., Lips, K.R., Pringle, C.M., Connelly, S., and Peterson, S.D.. 2010. Potential Functional Redundancy and Resource Facilitation between Tadpoles and Insect Grazers in Tropical Headwater Streams. Freshwater Biology 55(10):20772088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Conservation Fund. 2011. Green Infrastructure. The Conservation Fund, Arlington, VA. http://www.greeninfrastructure.net/content/community-practice (accessed August 18, 2011).Google Scholar
Davis, A.P., Hunt, W.F., Traver, R.G., and Clar, M.. 2009. Bioretention Technology: Overview of Current Practice and Future Needs. Journal of Environmental Engineering 135(3):109117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreher, D. 2009. Chicago Wilderness Green Infrastructure Vision: Challenges and Opportunities for the Built Environment. Journal of Green Building 4(3):7288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, D.L. 2006. MetroGreen: Connecting Open Space in North American Cities. Island Press, Washington, DC, 333 pp.Google Scholar
Faith, D.P., Humphrey, C.L., and Dostine, P.L.. 1991. Statistical Power and BACI Designs in Biological Monitoring: Comparative Evaluation of Measures of Community Dissimilarity Based on Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities in Rockhole Mine Creek, Northern Territory, Australia. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 42(5):589602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, T.D., Walsh, C.J., Bos, D., Nemes, V., RossRakesh, S., Prosser, T., Hatt, B.E., and Birch, R.. 2011. Restoration of Stormwater Retention Capacity at the Allotment-Scale through a Novel Economic Instrument. Water Science and Technology 64(2):494502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilroy, K.L., and McCuen, R.H.. 2009. Spatio-temporal Effects of Low Impact Development Practices. Journal of Hydrology 367(3-4):228236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawthorne, M. 2011. Feds Probe Chronic Sewage Overflows into Lake, Streams. Chicago Tribune, March 19, 2011.Google Scholar
Klepal, C. 2001. The Big Drain for Flash Floods. Cincinnati Enquirer, August 12, 2001, p. 1.Google Scholar
Konrad, C.P., and Booth, D.B.. 2005. Hydrologic Changes in Urban Streams and Their Ecological Significance. American Fisheries Society Symposium 47:157177. Available at http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/urban/pdf/157-178_Konrad.pdf (accessed February 12, 2012).Google Scholar
Marzolf, E.R., Mulholland, P.J., and Steinman, A.D.. 1994. Improvements to the Diurnal Upstream-Downstream Dissolved-Oxygen Change Technique for Determining Whole-Stream Metabolism in Small Streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51(7):15911599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2003. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series. Island Press, Washington, DC, 245 pp. Available at http://www.maweb.org/en/Framework.aspx (accessed February 12, 2012).Google Scholar
Mulholland, P.J., Fellows, C.S., Tank, J.L., Grimm, N.B., Webster, J.R., Hamilton, S.K., Martiâ, E., Ashkenas, L., Bowden, W.B., Dodds, W.K., McDowell, W.H., Paul, M.J., and Peterson, B.J.. 2001. Inter-biome Comparison of Factors Controlling Stream Metabolism. Freshwater Biology 46(11):15031517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mysiak, J., Guipponi, C., and Rosato, P.. 2005. Towards the Development of a Decision Support System for Water Resource Management. Environmental Modelling and Software 20(2):203214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimick, D.A., Gammons, C.H., and Parker, S.R.. 2011. Diel Biogeochemical Processes and Their Effect on the Aqueous Chemistry of Streams: A Review. Chemical Geology 283(1-2):317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberndorfer, E., Lundholm, J., Bass, B., Coffman, R.R., Doshi, H., Dunnett, N., Gaffin, S., Köhler, M., Liu, K.K.Y., and Rowe, B.. 2007. Green Roofs as Urban Ecosystems: Ecological Structures, Functions, and Services. BioScience 57(10):823833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parikh, P., Taylor, M., Hoagland, T., Thurston, H., and Shuster, W.. 2005. Application of Market Mechanisms and Incentives to Reduce Stormwater Runoff: An Integrated Hydrologic, Economic, and Legal Approach. Environmental Science and Policy 8(2):133144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pataki, D.E., Carreiro, M.M., Cherrier, J., Grulke, N.E., Jennings, V., Pincetl, S., Pouyat, R.V., Whitlow, T.H., and Zipperer, W.C.. 2011. Coupling Biogeochemical Cycles in Urban Environments: Ecosystem Services, Green Solutions, and Misconceptions. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 9(1):2736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pincetl, S. 2010. From the Sanitary City to the Sustainable City: Challenges to Institutionalizing Biogenic (Nature's Services) Infrastructure. Local Environment 15(1):4358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polasky, S., Caldarone, G., Duarte, T.K., Goldstein, J., Hannahs, N., Ricketts, T., and Tallis, H.. 2011. Putting Ecosystem Service Models to Work: Conservation, Management, and Trade-offs. In Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services, Kareiva, P., Tallis, H., Ricketts, T.H., Daily, G.C. and Polasky, S., eds. Oxford University Press, New York, 249263.Google Scholar
Shuster, W., Bonta, J., Thurston, H., Warnemuende, E., and Smith, D.R.. 2005. Impacts of Impervious Surface on Watershed Hydrology: A Review. Urban Water Journal 2(4):263275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuster, W.D., Morrison, M.A., and Thurston, H.W.. 2010. Seasonal and Situational Impacts on the Effectiveness of a Decentralized Stormwater Management Program in the Reduction of Runoff Volume (Cincinnati OH; USA). In NOVAtech 2010, Lyon, France, June 27–July 1, 2010. Available at http://documents.irevues.inist.fr/bitstream/handle/2042/35775/12102-364SHU.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed February 12, 2012).Google Scholar
Shuster, W.D., and Rhea, L.K.. In review. Hydrologic Implications of Parcel-Level Stormwater Management at the Catchment Scale (Ohio, USA). Journal of Hydrology.Google Scholar
Spatari, S., Yu, Z., and Montalto, F.A.. 2011. Life Cycle Implications of Urban Green Infrastructure. Environmental Pollution 159(8-9):21742179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Testa, S. III, Shields, F. D. Jr., and Cooper, C.M.. 2011. Macroinvertebrate Response to Stream Restoration by Large Wood Addition. Ecohydrology 4(5):631643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurston, H., Goddard, H.C., Szlag, D., and Lemberg, B.. 2003. Controlling Stormwater Runoff with Tradable Allowances for Impervious Surfaces. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 129(5):409418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurston, H.W., Roy, A.H., Shuster, W.D., Cabezas, H., Morrison, M.A., and Taylor, M.A.. 2008. Using Economic Incentives to Manage Stormwater Runoff in the Shepherd Creek Watershed, Part I. EPA/600/R-08/129. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 58 pp. Available at http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/pubs/600r08129/600r08129.pdf (accessed February 12, 2012).Google Scholar
Thurston, H.W., Taylor, M.A., Shuster, W.D., Morrison, A.H. Roy and M.A.. 2010. Using a Reverse Auction to Promote Household Level Stormwater Control. Environmental Science & Policy 13(5):405414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations (UN). 2010. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2009 Revision. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, New York. http://esa.un.org/wup2009/unup/index.asp?panel=1 (accessed 9 August 2011).Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1999. Preliminary Data Summary of Urban Stormwater Best Management Practices. EPA-821-R-99-012. USEPA, Washington, DC, 216 pp. Available at http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/guide/stormwater/ (accessed February 12, 2012).Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2009. Managing Stormwater with Low Impact Development Practices: Addressing Barriers to LID. EPA-901-F-09-003. USEPA New England, Boston, 7 pp.http://www.epa.gov/region1/npdes/stormwater/assets/pdfs/AddressingBarrier2LID.pdf (accessed February 12, 2012).Google Scholar
Van De Meene, S.J., and Brown, R.R.. 2009. Delving into the “Institutional Black Box”: Revealing the Attributes of Sustainable Urban Water Management Regimes. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 45(6):14481464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, C.J., Fletcher, T.D., and Ladson, A.R.. 2005. Stream Restoration in Urban Catchments through Re-designing Stormwater Systems: Looking to the Catchment to Save the Stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24(3):690705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, C.J., Roy, A.H., Feminella, J.W., Cottingham, P.D., Groffman, P.M., and Morgan, R.P.. 2005. The Urban Stream Syndrome: Current Knowledge and the Search for a Cure. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24(3):706723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar