Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:21:16.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of a serological Salmonella Mix-ELISA for poultry used in a national surveillance programme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2001

N. C. FELD
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Danish Veterinary Laboratory, Copenhagen, Denmark
L. EKEROTH
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Danish Veterinary Laboratory, Copenhagen, Denmark
K. O. GRADEL
Affiliation:
Department of Poultry, Fish and Fur-bearing Animals, Danish Veterinary Laboratory, Aarhus, Denmark
S. KABELL
Affiliation:
Department of Poultry, Fish and Fur-bearing Animals, Danish Veterinary Laboratory, Aarhus, Denmark
M. MADSEN
Affiliation:
Department of Poultry, Fish and Fur-bearing Animals, Danish Veterinary Laboratory, Aarhus, Denmark
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A Mix-ELISA using lipopolysaccharide antigens from Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis and Typhimurium was evaluated using samples collected over time in the Danish salmonella surveillance programme for poultry. Serological samples (n = 42813) taken from broiler-breeder flocks after a year of bacteriological monitoring with negative results were used for calculating the flock and individual test specificities, which were 0·997 and 0·999, respectively. Layer flocks from the table egg sector were used for calculation of positive predictive values. In the survey, flocks were examined for salmonella by Mix-ELISA and by faecal culture, and in case of a positive result in either of these a repeated, serological testing was performed, and 60 animals were organ-cultured. If one of these samplings was positive, the flock was declared salmonella infected. In a period of 3 months, 35 flocks were found to be positive in the routine samples. Of these, 32 were serologically positive, 2 both serologically and faecally positive and 1 flock only faecally positive. For flocks serologically positive in the surveillance programme, a positive-predictive value of 0·62 for organ culture positivity was found, and while considering serological follow-up samples, the value was 0·95.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press