Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:05:33.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of monensin on in vitro fermentation of maize starch by hindgut contents of cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. Marounek ,
O. Petr  and
L. Machañová
M. Marounek
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, 104 00 Prague 10, Uhrineves, Czechoslovakia
O. Petr
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, 104 00 Prague 10, Uhrineves, Czechoslovakia
L. Machañová
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Production, Prague 10, Czechoslovakia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Contents of the caecum and the colon of four steers and four cows fed concentrate-plus-roughage diets were obtained at an abattoir, transferred to the laboratory and incubated anaerobically with maize starch in the presence (10mg/l) or absence of monensin. Samples taken at the end of incubation were assayed for fermentation acids and methane production.

Monensin significantly increased the molar percentage of propionate and decreased that of butyrate. Acetate percentage was not significantly influence by the addition of monensin. There was no consistent effect of monensin on total volatile fatty acid concentrations. Monensin decreased methanogenesis in all incubations. The production of methane was small, only 1 mmol/13–50 mmol of volatile fatty acid.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 115 , Issue 3 , December 1990 , pp. 389 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baldwin, R. L., Lucas, H. L. & Cabrera, R. (1970). Energetic relationships in the formation and utilization of fermentation end-products. In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminants (Ed. Phillipson, A. T.), pp. 319–334. Newcastle upon Tyne: Oriel Press.Google Scholar
Bergen, W. G. & Bates, D. B. (1984). Ionophores: their effect on production efficiency and mode of action. Journal of Animal Science 58, 1465–1483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brink, D. R. & Steele, R. T. (1985). Site and extent of starch and neutral detergent fiber digestion as affected by source of calcium and level of corn. Journal of Animal Science 60, 1330–1337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conway, E. J. (1957). Microdiffusion Analysis and Volumetric Error, 4th edn, pp. 277–278. London: Crosby Lockwood & Son.Google Scholar
Davison, K. L. (1984). Monensin absorption and metabolism in calves and chickens. Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry 32, 1273–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demeyer, D., Degraeve, K., Durand, M. & Stevani, J. (1989). Acetate: a hydrogen sink in hindgut fermentation as opposed to rumen fermentation. In Comparative Aspects of Physiology of Digestion in Ruminants and Hindgut Fermentors. Abstracts of the Satellite Symposium of the 31st Congress of the International Union of Physiological Sciences, Copenhagen, 6–807 1989.Google Scholar
Donoho, A., Manthey, J., Occolowitz, J., & Zornes, L. (1978). Metabolism of monensin in the steer and rat. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 26, 1090–1095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herberg, R., Manthey, J., Richardson, L., Cooley, C. & Donoho, A. (1978). Excretion and tissue distribution of [14C] monensin in cattle. Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry 16, 1087–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marounek, M., Bartos, S., & Brezina, P. (1985). Factors influencing the production of volatile fatty acids from hemicellulose, pectin and starch by mixed culture of rumen microorganisms. Zeitschrift fur Tierphysiologie, Tiererndhrung und Futlermittelkunde 53, 50–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcdougall, E. I. (1949). Studies on ruminant saliva. I. The composition and output of sheep's saliva. Biochemical Journal 43, 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muntifering, R. B., Theurer, B. & Noon, T. H. (1981). Effects of monensin on site and extent of whole corn digestion and bacterial protein synthesis in beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 53, 1565–1573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nehring, K. (1961). Lehrbuch der Tiererndhrung und Futtermittelkunde, 7th edn, pp. 79–124. Radebeul and Berlin: Neumann Verlag.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. (1986). Starch digestion and utilization in ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 63, 1624–1633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1956). Statistical Methods, 5th edn, pp. 45–47. Ames: Iowa University Press.Google Scholar
Yokoyama, M. T., Johnson, K. A., Dickerson, P. S. & Bergen, W. G. (1985). Effect of dietary monensin on the caecal fermentation of steers. Journal of Animal Science 61, Suppl. 1,469.Google Scholar