Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:37:25.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fructose content and fructolysis in semen. Practical application in the evaluation of semen quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. Mann
T. Mann
Affiliation:
Molteno Institute, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

1. A method is described whereby fructose content and fructolysis can be assayed accurately in small samples of semen. The advantages of this method lie in its simplicity, accuracy and practical convenience as a tool for the assessment of semen quality, applicable also under field conditions.

2. The content of fructose in fresh semen depends upon the secretory function of accessory glands which is influenced directly by the activity of the male sex hormone. A low level of seminal fructose may coincide with other symptoms of hormonal malfunction and poor quality of spermatozoa. A high level of seminal fructose indicates satisfactory functional ability of the accessory glands, but it does not necessarily coincide with high quality of spermatozoa as expressed in terms of density and motility.

3. The normal level of fructose in fresh semen undergoes frequent fluctuations which can be observed if semen collections are made from the same individual at different times. Considerable variations in the sperm/fructose ratio may also occur in the semen of the same individual as illustrated by the results of an ‘exhaustion test’.

4. Fructose disappears from semen incubated in vitro. The rate of fructose disappearance forms a convenient measure of sperm fructolysis. The normal rate of fructolysis in bull semen is 1·4–2 mg. fructose per 109 sperm cells in 1 hr. at 37° C. At this high level it can be maintained until almost the whole reserve of fructose has been exhausted. Azoospermic and necrospennic semen, as well as that from vasectomized animals, are unable to utilize fructose. A reduced rate of fructolysis is found in low quality semen of subfertile and infertile animals.

5. The conditions of sperm survival in semen incubated in narrow tubes as used for the fructolysis test as well as for storage of semen in the practice of artificial insemination, are almost purely anaerobic. Under such conditions the survival of spermatozoa must largely depend upon fructolysis and not upon respiration.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , July 1948 , pp. 323 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. (1945). The Semen of Animals and its use for Artificial Insemination. Edinburgh: Imperial Bureau of Animal Breeding and Genetics.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (1946). J. Agric. Sci. 36, 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, M. C. & Walton, A. (1940). Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 129, 517.Google Scholar
Comstock, R. E. (1939). J. Exp. Zool. 81, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comstock, R. E., Green, W. W., Winters, L. M. & Nordskog, A. W. (1943). Bull. Univ. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta. no. 162.Google Scholar
Davies, D. V. & Mann, T. (1947). Nature, Lond., 160, 294.Google Scholar
Friedemann, F., Cotonio, M. & Shaffer, P. (1929). J. Biol. Chem. 82, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanov, I. I., Kassavina, B. D. & Fomenko, L. D. (1946). Nature, Lond., 158, 624.Google Scholar
King, E. J. (1946). Microanalysis in Medical Biochemistry. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Laing, J. A. (1944). J. Agric. Sci. 35, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, H. A., Hansen, R. G. & Phillips, P. H. (1945). Arch. Biochem. 6, 41.Google Scholar
MacLeod, J. (1941). Amer. J. Physiol. 132, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, T. (1945 a). Nature, Lond., 156, 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, T. (1945 b). Biochem. J. 39, 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, T. (1945 c). Biochem. J. 39, 458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, T. (1946 a). Nature, Lond., 157, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, T. (1946 b). Biochem. J. 40, xxix.Google Scholar
Mann, T. (1946 c). Biochem. J. 40, 481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, T. (1948). Lancet, 254, 446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, T. & Parsons, U. (1947). Nature, Lond., 160, 294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, B. H. & Mayer, D. T. (1941). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 338.Google Scholar
Phillips, P. H. & Lardy, H. A. (1940). J. Dairy Sci. 23, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, J. H. (1934). J. Biol. Chem. 107, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, G. W. ‘The glycolysis, livability and fertility of bovine spermatozoa as influenced by their concentration’, in Engle, T., The Problem of Fertility, 1946, p. 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, G. W. & Van Denmark, N. L. (1945). Amer. J. Physiol. 143, 692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegler, S. L. (1946). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynaec. 51, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, A. (1945). Notes on Artificial Insemination of Sheep, Cattle and Horses. London: Holborn Surgical Instrument Co.Google Scholar
Walton, A. & Edwards, J. (1938). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. 31st Ann. Meeting, 254.Google Scholar
Webster, W. M. (1939). Proc. 8th Ann. Meeting of Sheep Farmers, Massey Agric. Coll., New Zealand.Google Scholar