Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-18T00:02:33.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Accounting for the Electoral Success of the Liberal Party in Canada Presidential address to the Canadian Political Science Association London, Ontario June 3, 2005

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2005

André Blais
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal

Abstract

Abstract. I show that the strong electoral success of the Liberal party in Canada stems in great part from the strong support of Catholics and Canadians of non-European origin. In the absence of the fervent backing it enjoys among these two groups, the Liberals would not be among the most successful democratic parties in the world. Yet, we do not have a good understanding of why Catholics and non-Europeans vote Liberal. I argue that the group bases of Liberal support should lead us to question the common interpretation that the party's centrist policy position is the key to its electoral success.

Résumé. Je montre que le succès électoral du Parti libéral fédéral au Canada découle en bonne partie de l'appui des catholiques et des citoyens d'origine non européenne. Sans l'appui solide de ces deux groupes, le Parti libéral n'aurait pas remporté les succès électoraux remarquables qu'il a connus. Pourtant, nous n'avons toujours pas d'explication satisfaisante des raisons qui amènent les catholiques et les citoyens d'origine non européenne à voter pour le Parti libéral. Je soutiens que ces tendances sociologiques lourdes devraient nous inciter à remettre en question l'interprétation habituelle selon laquelle les succès libéraux sont attribuables aux positions centristes du parti.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Paul R., John Herbert Aldrich and David W. Rohde. 2003. Change and Continuity in the 2000 and 2002 elections. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Achen, Christopher. 1982. Interpreting and Using Regression. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Blais, André and Jean Crête. 1989. “Comportements et attitudes de masse: changement et stabilité.” In Générations et politique, eds. Jean Crête and Pierre Favre. Sainte-Foy: Les Presses de l'Université Laval.
Blais, André, Elisabeth Gidengil, Richard Nadeau and Neil Nevitte. 1999. “Making Sense of Regional Voting in the 1997 Federal Election: Liberal and Reform Support Outside Quebec.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 32: 247272.Google Scholar
Blais, André, Elisabeth Gidengil, Richard Nadeau and Neil Nevitte. 2001. “Measuring Party Identification: Britain, Canada and the United States.” Political Behavior 23: 522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André, Elisabeth Gidengil, Richard Nadeau and Neil Nevitte. 2002. Anatomy of a Liberal Victory: Making Sense of the Vote in the 2000 Canadian Election. Peterview: Broadview Press.
Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Castles, Frank and Peter Mair. 1984. “Left-Right Political Scale: Some Expert Judgments.” European Journal of Political Research 12: 7388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., David Sanders, Marianne C. Stewart and Paul Whiteley. 2004. Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cutler, Fred. 2002. “The Simplest Shortcut of All: Vote-Candidate Socio-Demographic Similarity and Electoral Choice.” Journal of Politics 64: 466490.Google Scholar
Bélanger, Paul and Munroe Eagles. 2005. “The Geography of Class and Religion in Canadian Elections Voting Revisited: A Research Note.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, London, Ontario.
Franklin, Mark N., Thomas T. Mackie, Henry Valen, with Clive Bean and al. 1992. Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Imbeau, Louis. 1985. “Aid to the Third World: A Comparative Analysis of the Causes of Aggregate Donor Development.” Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Irvine, William P. 1974. “Explaining the Religious Basis of the Canadian Partisan Identity: Success on the Third Try.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 7: 560563.Google Scholar
Johnston, Richard. 1985. “The Reproduction of the Religious Cleavage in Canadian Elections.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 18: 99113.Google Scholar
Johnston, Richard. 1991. “The Geography of Class and Religion in Canadian Elections.” In The Ballot and Its Message, ed. Joseph Wearing. Toronto: Copp Clark Pitman.
Johnston, Richard, André Blais, André Brady and Jean Crête 1992. Letting the People Decide: Dynamics of a Canadian Election. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
King, Gary. 1986. “How Not To Lie With Statistics: Avoiding Common Mistakes in Quantitative Political Science.” American Journal of Political Science 30: 666687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDuc, Lawrence. 1984. “Canada: The Politics of Stable Dealignment.” In Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies: Realignment or Dealignment?, eds. Russell J. Dalton, Paul Beck and Scott Flanagan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Meisel, John. 1956. “Religious Affiliation and Electoral Behavior.” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 22: 481496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevitte, Neil, André Blais, Elisabeth Gidengil and Richard Nadeau. 2000. Unsteady State: The 1997 Canadian Federal Election. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Rabinowitz, George, Stuart E. Macdonald and Ola Listhaug. 1991. “New Players in an Old Game: Party Strategy in Multiparty Systems.” Comparative Political Studies 24: 147185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Mildred A. 1974. “Canadian Voting Behavior.” In Electoral Behavior: A Comparative Handbook, ed. Richard Rose. New York: The Free Press.