Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:00:39.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Semantic versus Syntactic Cues in Listening Comprehension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Linda Conrad
Linda Conrad
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies have shown that less fluent non-native readers cannot make full use of semantic-level cues. Non-natives direct proportionately more attention than natives to syntactic and graphophonic information. This study asked whether a similar difference would be found between native and non-native listeners. Three groups were tested: native English-speakers and advanced and intermediate non-natives. After hearing a text, subjects were given a 55-item cloze test. It was hypothesized that with a subject's increased proficiency in the language, processing would show progressively greater attention to semantic than to syntactic or phonological cues. The cloze test was scored using a diagnostic scoring procedure developed by Clarke and Burdell (1977). Results confirmed the hypothesis. Semantically acceptable responses increased progressively for intermediate, advanced, and native groups, while responses based on syntactic structure decreased.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 59 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Asher, James J., Kusudo, Jo Anne, & Torre, Rita De la. 1974. Learning a second language through commands: The second field test. The Modem Language Journal 58; 24–32.Google Scholar
Anderson, James A. 1977. Neural models with cognitive implications. In Berge, David La & Samuels, S. Jay (eds.) Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension, pp. 27–90. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bachman, Lyle F. 1982. The trait structure of cloze test scores. TESOL Quarterly 16; 61–70.Google Scholar
Chihara, T., Oller, J., Weaver, K., & Chavez-Oller, M.A.. 1977. Are cloze items sensitive to discourse constraints? Language Learning 27; 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Mark A. 1979. Reading in Spanish and English: Evidence from adult ESL students. Language Learning, 29; 121–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Mark A., & Burdell, Linda. 1977. Shades of meaning: Syntactic and semantic parameters of cloze test responses. In Brown, H.D., Yorio, C.A., & Crymes, R.H. (eds.), On TESOL 1977, pp. 131–43. Washington, D.C.: TESOL.Google Scholar
Conrad, Linda. 1981. Listening comprehension strategies in native and second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Cziko, Gary A. 1978. Differences in first- and second- language reading: The use of syntactic, semantic and discourse constraints. The Canadian Modem Language Review 34(3); 473–89.Google Scholar
Devine, Joanne. 1979. Developmental patterns in native and non-native reading acquisition. Paper presented at the Thirteenth Annual TESOL Convention, Boston, March.Google Scholar
Fishler, Ira, & Goodman, Rachel. 1978. Semantic and episodic constraints on the use of surface-order cues in the comprehension of locative sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 7; 121–34.Google Scholar
Goodman, Kenneth S. 1969. Analysis of oral reading miscues: Applied psycholinguistics. Reading Research Quarterly 5; 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Yetta, & Burke, Carolyn. 1972. Reading miscue inventory: Procedure for diagnosis and evaluation. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goodman, Yetta, & Burke, Carolyn. 1973. Theoretically based studies of patterns of miscues in oral reading performance. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of HEW, Office of Education.Google Scholar
Hanzeli, Victor. 1979. Cloze tests in French as a foreign language: Error analysis. In Brière, Eugene and Hinofotis, Frances (eds.). Concepts in language testing: Some recent studies, pp. 3–11. Washington, D.C.: TESOL.Google Scholar
Haviland, Susan, & Clarke, Herbert. 1974. What's new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13; 512–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W. 1974. The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W., & Monk, D.. 1972. Storage of complex information in memory: Some implications of the speed with which inferences can be made. Journal of Experimental Psychology 94; 25–32.Google Scholar
Lapkin, S., & Swain, M.. 1977. The use of English and French cloze tests in a bilingual program evaluation: Validity and error analysis. Language Learning 27; 279–314.Google Scholar
Macnamara, John. 1970. Comparative studies of reading and problem solving in two languages. TESOL Quarterly 4; 107–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehler, J., Segui, J., Pittet, M., & Barrière, M.. 1978. Strategies for sentence perception. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 7(1); 3–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mistler-Lachman, Janet L. 1974. Depth of comprehension and sentence memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13; 98–106.Google Scholar
Oller, John W. 1972. Assessing competence in ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly 6; 313–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oller, John W. 1975. Cloze, discourse, and approximations to English. In Burt, M.K. and Dulay, H.C. eds., On TESOL 1975, pp. 345–55. Washington, D.C.: TESOL.Google Scholar
Oller, John W., & Conrad, C.. 1971. The cloze technique and ESL proficiency. Language Learning 21; 183–96.Google Scholar
Oller, John W., Bowen, D., Dien, T.T., & Mason, V.W.. 1972. Cloze tests in English, Thai, and Vietnamese: Native and non-native performance. Language Learning 22; 1–16.Google Scholar
Page, William D. 1975. The post oral reading cloze test: New link between oral reading and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior 7(4); 383–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postovsky, Valerian. 1974. Effects of delay in oral practice at the beginning of second language learning. The Modern Language Journal 58; 229–39.Google Scholar
Reeds, James, Winitz, Harris, & Garcia, Paul. 1977. A test of reading following comprehension training. International Review of Applied Linguistics 15; 307–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winitz, Harris, Riviere, Conrad La, & Herriman, Eva. 1973. Perception of word boundaries under conditions of lexical bias. Phonetica 27(4); 193–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed