Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T22:55:14.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Discipline of Identification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 December 2014

Luke Keele*
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Big Data, Causal Inference, and Formal Theory: Contradictory Trends in Political Science?
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, Chris. 2008. “The End of Theory.” Available at http:// archive.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16-07/pb_theory. Accessed September 3, 2014.Google Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D., and Pischke, Jorn-Steffen. 2010. “The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design Is Taking the Con out of Econometrics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (2): 330.Google Scholar
Cochran, William G., and Chambers, S. Paul. 1965. “The Planning of Observational Studies of Human Populations.” Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A 128 (2): 234–65.Google Scholar
Keele, Luke J., and Minozzi, William. 2012. “How Much Is Minnesota Like Wisconsin? Assumptions and Counterfactuals in Causal Inference with Observational Data.” Political Analysis 21 (2): 193216.Google Scholar
Manski, Charles F. 1990. “Nonparametric Bounds on Treatment Effects.” The American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 80 (2): 319–23.Google Scholar
. 2013. Public Policy in an Uncertain World: Analysis and Decisions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar