Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T18:51:36.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perestroika and the Journals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2010

Gregory J. Kasza
Gregory J. Kasza
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is fitting to measure Perestroika's impact through the contents of the leading political science association journals. The original Perestroika manifesto railed at the American Political Science Review (APSR), and many subsequent Perestroika protests condemned the skewed contents of the APSR, the American Journal of Political Science (AJPS), and the Journal of Politics. Large national and regional associations publish and pay for these journals. The position of Perestroika has been that their contents should represent the many types of research that political scientists are doing, which was not the case when the movement began.

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , October 2010 , pp. 733 - 734
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kasza, Gregory J. 2005. “Methodological Bias in the American Journal of Political Science.” In Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science, ed. Monroe, Kristen Renwick, 342–45. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David, and Cleary, Dan. 2005. “Methodological Bias in the APSR.” In Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science, ed. Monroe, Kristen Renwick, 304–22. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar