Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:18:10.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Short- and long-term social outcomes following pediatric traumatic brain injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2004

KEITH OWEN YEATES ,
ERIKA SWIFT ,
H. GERRY TAYLOR ,
SHARI L. WADE ,
DENNIS DROTAR ,
TERRY STANCIN  and
NORI MINICH
KEITH OWEN YEATES
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, and Children's Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
ERIKA SWIFT
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, and Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio
H. GERRY TAYLOR
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, and Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio
SHARI L. WADE
Affiliation:
College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
DENNIS DROTAR
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, and Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio
TERRY STANCIN
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, and MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
NORI MINICH
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, and Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The social outcomes of pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) were examined in a prospective, longitudinal study that included 53 children with severe TBI, 56 with moderate TBI, and 80 with orthopedic injuries, recruited between 6 and 12 years of age. Child and family functioning were assessed at baseline, at 6- and 12-month follow-ups, and at an extended follow-up a mean of 4 years post injury. Growth curve analyses revealed that pediatric TBI yields negative social outcomes that are exacerbated by family environments characterized by lower socioeconomic status, fewer family resources, and poorer family functioning. After controlling for group membership, age, race, socioeconomic status, and IQ, path analyses indicated that long-term social outcomes were accounted for in part by specific neurocognitive skills, including executive functions and pragmatic language, and by social problem-solving. Deficits in these domains among children with TBI are likely to reflect damage to a network of brain regions that have been implicated in social cognition. (JINS, 2004, 10, 412–426.)

Keywords

Traumatic brain injuryChildrenSocial outcomes
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , May 2004 , pp. 412 - 426
Copyright
© 2004 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Achenbach, T.M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.
Adolphs, R. (2001). The neurobiology of social cognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, P., Anderson, V., Northam, E., & Taylor, H.G. (2000). Standardization of the Contingency Naming Test: A measure of reactive flexibility. Clinical Neuropsychological Assessment, 1, 247–273.Google Scholar
Andrews, T.K., Rose, F.D., & Johnson, D.A. (1998). Social and behavioural effects of traumatic brain injury in children. Brain Injury, 12, 133–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, R.M. & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bérubé, R.L. & Achenbach, T.M. (2003). Bibliography of published studies using ASEBA instruments: 2003 edition. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
Bohnert, A.M., Parker, J.G., & Warschausky, S.A. (1997). Friendship and social adjustment of children following a traumatic brain injury: An exploratory investigation. Developmental Neuropsychology, 13, 477–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchinal, M.R., Bailey, D.B., & Snyder, P. (1994). Using growth curve analysis to evaluate child changes in longitudinal investigations. Journal of Early Intervention, 18, 422–442.Google Scholar
Byles, J., Byrne, C., Boyle, M.H., & Offord, D.R. (1988). Ontario Child Health Study: Reliability and validity of the general functioning subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device. Family Process, 27, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J.T., Bernston, G.G., Sheridan, J.F., & McClintock, M.K. (2000). Multilevel integrative analyses of human behavior: Social neuroscience and the complementing nature of social and biological approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 829–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, O., Rutter, M., Brown, G., Shaffer, D., & Traub, M. (1981). A prospective study of children with head injuries: II. Cognitive sequelae. Psychological Medicine, 11, 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicchetti, D.V. & Nelson, L.D. (1994). Re-examining threats to the reliability and validity of putative brain-behavior relationships: New guidelines for assessing the effects of patients lost to follow-up. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16, 339–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, M. & Barnes, M.A. (1990). Knowing the meaning, getting the point, bridging the gap, and carrying the message: aspects of discourse following closed head injury in childhood and adolescence. Brain and Language, 39, 428–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, M., Guger, S., Roncadin, C., Barnes, M., & Schachar, R. (2001). Attentional-inhibitory control and social-behavioral regulation after childhood closed head injury: Do biological, developmental, and recovery variables predict outcome? Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 683–692.Google Scholar
Dodge, K.A., Laird, R., Lochman, J.E., & Zelli, A. (2002). Multidimensional latent-construct analysis of children's social information processing patterns: Correlations with aggressive behavior problems. Psychological Assessment, 14, 60–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drotar, D., Stein, R.E.K., & Perrin, E.C. (1995). Methodological issues in using the Child Behavior Checklist and its related instruments in clinical child psychology research. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 24, 184–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, J.M., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Francis, D.J., & Levin, H.S. (1995). Variability in outcomes after traumatic brain injury in children: A developmental perspective. In S.H. Broman & M.E. Michel. Traumatic Head Injury in Children (pp. 3–21). New York: Oxford University Press.
Francis, D.J., Copeland, D.R., & Moore, B.D. (1994). Neuropsychological changes in children with cancer: The treatment of missing data in longitudinal studies. Neuropsychology Review, 4, 199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, J.P., Brady, K.D., Chen, A., Vasa, R., Grados, M., Bandeen-Roche, K.J., Bryan, R.N., & Denckla, M.B. (1998). Premorbid prevalence of ADHD and development of secondary ADHD after closed head injury. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 37, 647–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gest, S.D., Graham-Bermann, S.A., & Hartup, W.W. (2001). Peer experience: Common and unique features of number of friendships, social network centrality, and sociometric status. Social Development, 10, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glang, A., Todis, B., Cooley, E., Wells, J., & Voss, J. (1997). Building social networks for children and adolescents with traumatic brain injury: A school-based intervention. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 12, 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, C.L. & Keightley, M.L. (2002). Studies of altered social cognition in neuropsychiatric disorders using functional neuroimaging. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 47, 327–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gresham, F.M., Sugai, G., & Horner, R.H. (2001). Interpreting outcomes of social skills training for students with high-incidence disabilities. Exceptional Children, 67, 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guralnick, M.J. (1999). Family and child influences on the peer-related social competence of young children with developmental delays. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 5, 21–29.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmbeck, G.N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 599–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmbeck, G.N. (2002). Post-hoc probing of significant moderational and mediational effects in studies of pediatric populations. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, J.S., Landis, K.R., & Umberson, D. (1988). Social relationships and health. Science, 29, 540–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janusz, J.A., Kirkwood, M.W., Yeates, K.O., & Taylor, H.G. (2002). Social problem-solving skills in children with traumatic brain injury: Long-term outcomes and prediction of social competence. Child Neuropsychology, 8, 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennrich, R.I. & Schluchter, M.D. (1986). Unbalanced repeated-measures models with structured covariance matrices. Biometrics, 42, 805–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamphaus, R.W. (1987). Defining the construct of adaptive behavior by the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsella, G., Ong, B., Murtagh, D., Prior, M., & Sawyer, M. (1999). The role of the family for behavioral outcome in children and adolescents following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 116–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klem, L. (2000). Structural equation modeling. In L.G. Grimm & P.R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 227–259). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Kolb, B., Gibb, R., & Robinson, T.E. (2003). Brain plasticity and behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemerise, E.A. & Arsenio, W.F. (2000). An integrated model of emotion processes and cognition in social information processing. Child Development, 71, 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, H., Amparo, E., Eisenberg, H., Miner, M., High, W., Jr., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Fletcher, J., & Guinto, F., Jr. (1989). MRI after closed head injury in children. Neurosurgery, 24, 223–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masten, A.S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56, 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Max, J.E., Koele, S.L., Lindgren, S.D., Robin, D.A., Smith, W.L., Jr., Sato, Y., & Arndt, S. (1998). Adaptive functioning following traumatic brain injury and orthopedic injury: A controlled study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79, 893–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, W. & Werven, G. (1995). Social competence and head injury: A new emphasis. Brain Injury, 9, 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, W., Werven, G., & Douglas, M.M. (1997). Social competence and head injury: A practical approach. Brain Injury, 11, 621–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, T.L. & Rothenberg, M.B. (1986). Behavioral and psychosocial sequelae of pediatric head injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 1, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelsohn, D., Levin, H.S., Bruce, D., Lilly, M., Harward, H., Culhane, K.A., & Eisenberg, H.M. (1992). Late MRI after head injury in children: Relationship to clinical features and outcome. Child's Nervous System, 8, 445–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, I.W., Bishop, D.S., Epstein, N.B., & Keitner, G.I. (1985). The McMaster Family Assessment Device: Reliability and validity. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 11, 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moos, R. & Moos, B. (1994). Life Stressors and Social Resources Inventory–Adult Form: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
Nassau, J.H. & Drotar, D. (1997). Social competence among children with central nervous system-related chronic health conditions: A review. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 22, 771–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papero, P.H., Prigatano, G.P., Snyder, H.M., & Johnson, D.L. (1993). Children's adaptive behavioural competence after head injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 3, 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, J.G., Rubin, K.H., Price, J., & DeRosier, M.E. (1995). Peer relationships, child development, and adjustment: A developmental psychopathology perspective. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Vol. 2. Risk, disorder, and adaptation (pp. 96–161). New York: Wiley.
Rivara, J.B., Jaffe, K.M., Fay, G.C., Polissar, N.L., Martin, K.M., Shurtleff, H.A., & Liao, S. (1993). Family functioning and injury severity as predictors of child functioning one year following traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 1047–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivara, J.B., Jaffe, K.M., Polissar, N.L., Fay, G.C., Martin, K.M., Shurtleff, H.A., & Liao, S. (1994). Family functioning and children's academic performance and behavioral problems in the year following traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75, 369–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, K.H., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 619–700). New York: Wiley.
Rutter, M.L. (1999). Psychosocial adversity and child psychopathology. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 480–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute, Inc. (1990). Statistical Analysis System, Version 6. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
Sattler, J.M. (1992). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Jerome M. Sattler.
Schultz, L.H., Yeates, K.O., & Selman, R.L. (1988). The Interpersonal Negotiation Strategies (INS) Interview: A scoring manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education, The Group for the Study of Interpersonal Development.
Sobel, M.E. (1988). Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. In J.S. Long (Ed.), Common problems/proper solutions: Avoiding error in quantitative research (pp. 46–64). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Sparrow, S.S., Balla, D.A., & Cicchetti, D.V. (1984). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: Interview Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Stancin, T., Drotar, D., Taylor, H.G., Yeates, K.O., Wade, S.L., & Minich, N.M. (2002). Health-related quality of life of children and adolescents following traumatic brain injury. Pediatrics [On-line], 109, e34.Google Scholar
Stevens, G. & Featherman, D.L. (1981). A revised socioeconomic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 10, 364–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, H.G., Drotar, D., Wade, S., Yeates, K., Stancin, T., & Klein, S. (1995). Recovery from traumatic brain injury in children: The importance of the family. In S.H. Broman & M.E. Michel (Eds.), Traumatic head injury in children (pp. 188–216). New York: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, H.G., Yeates, K.O., Wade, S.L., Drotar, D., Klein, S., & Stancin, T. (1999). Influences on first-year recovery from traumatic brain injury in children. Neuropsychology, 13, 76–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, H.G., Yeates, K.O., Wade, S.L., Drotar, D., Stancin, T., & Burant, C. (2001). Bidirectional child-family influences on outcomes of traumatic brain injury in children. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 755–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, H.G., Yeates, K.O., Wade, S.L., Drotar, D., Stancin, T., & Minich, M. (2002). A prospective study of short- and long-term outcomes after traumatic brain injury in children: Behavior and achievement. Neuropsychology, 16, 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, G. & Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet, 2, 81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warschausky, S., Cohen, E.H., Parker, J.G., Levendosky, A.A., & Okun, A. (1997). Social problem-solving skills of children with traumatic brain injury. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 1, 77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–3rd Edition manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Wiig, E.H. & Secord, W. (1989). Test of Language Competence–Expanded Edition. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
Yeates, K.O. (2000). Closed-head injury. In K.O. Yeates, M.D. Ris, & H.G. Taylor (Eds.), Pediatric neuropsychology: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 92–116). New York: Guilford.
Yeates, K.O., Schultz, L.H., & Selman, R.L. (1990). Bridging the gaps in child-clinical assessment: Toward the application of social-cognitive developmental theory. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 567–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeates, K.O., Schultz, L.H., & Selman, R.L. (1991). The development of interpersonal negotiation strategies in thought and action: A social-cognitive link to behavioral adjustment and social status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 37, 369–406.Google Scholar
Yeates, K.O., Taylor, H.G., Drotar, D., Wade, S.L., Klein, S., Stancin, T., & Schatschneider, C. (1997). Preinjury family environment as a determinant of recovery from traumatic brain injuries in school-age children. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3, 617–630.Google Scholar
Yeates, K.O., Taylor, H.G., Wade, S.L., Drotar, D., Stancin, T., & Minich, N. (2002). A prospective study of short- and long-term neuropsychological outcomes after pediatric traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology, 16, 514–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar