Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:04:35.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MAIZE YIELDS RESPONSE TO APPLICATION OF ORGANIC AND INORGANIC INPUT UNDER ON-STATION AND ON-FARM EXPERIMENTS IN CENTRAL KENYA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2009

JAYNE MUGWE*
Affiliation:
Kenya Forestry Research Institute, P.O. Box 20412-00200, Nairobi, Kenya
DANIEL MUGENDI
Affiliation:
Kenyatta University, School of Environmental Studies and Human Sciences, Department of Environmental Sciences, P.O Box 43844 00100, Nairobi, Kenya
JAMES KUNGU
Affiliation:
Kenyatta University, School of Environmental Studies and Human Sciences, Department of Environmental Sciences, P.O Box 43844 00100, Nairobi, Kenya
MONICAH-MUCHERU MUNA
Affiliation:
Kenyatta University, School of Environmental Studies and Human Sciences, Department of Environmental Sciences, P.O Box 43844 00100, Nairobi, Kenya
*
Corresponding author: jaynemugwe@yahoo.com

Summary

This study investigated the feasibility of using sole organics or a combination of organics with inorganic fertilizer to improve maize production in on-station and on-farm experiments in central Kenya. In the on-station experiment, combined application of Calliandra calothyrsus, Leucaena trichandra and Tithonia diversifolia at 30 kg N ha−1 plus inorganic fertilizer (30 kg N ha−1) consistently gave significantly higher maize grain yields than the recommended rate of inorganic fertilizer (60 kg N ha−1). Sole application of calliandra, leucaena and tithonia also increased maize yields more than the recommended rate of inorganic fertilizer. In the on-farm experiment, calliandra, leucaena, tithonia and cattle manure either alone or combined with inorganic fertilizer increased maize yields with a similar magnitude to that of inorganic fertilizer. These organic resources could therefore be used to supplement inorganic fertilizer as a whole or in part. There was a yield gap between on-station and on-farm trials with on-station yields having, on average, 65% greater yields than the on-farm yields. There is therefore potential for increasing yields at the farm level by closing the yield gap.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abayomi, A., Fadayomi, O., Babatola, J. O. and Tian, G. (2001). Evaluation of selected legume cover crops for biomass production, dry season survival and soil fertility in a moist savanna location in Nigeria. African Crop Science Journal 9:615627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amede, T. (2003). Pathways for fitting legumes into East African highland farming system: A dual approach. In Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in Southern Africa: Taking Stock of Progress. Proceedings of a Conference (8–11 October 2002), Leopard Rock Hotel, Vumba, Zimbabwe, 21–32.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. M. and Ingram, J. S. L (1993). Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of Methods. Wallingford, UK: CABIGoogle Scholar
Baijukya, F. P. (2004). Adapting to change in banana-based farming systems of northwest Tanzania: The potential role of herbaceous legumes. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Bationo, A., Kimetu, J., Ikeera, S., Kimani, S., Mugendi, D., Odendo, M., Silver, M., Swift, M. J. and Sanging, N. (2004). The African Network for soil biology and fertility: New challenges and opportunities. In Managing Nutrient Cycles to Sustain Soil Fertility in Sub-Saharan Africa. 123. (Ed. Bationo, A.) Academy Science Publishers and Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Institute of CIAT, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Cadisch, G., Handayanto, E., Malama, C., Seyni, F. and Giller, K. E. (1998). N recovery from legume prunings and pruning effects are governed by the residue quality. Plant and Soil 205:124134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, G. and Casey, F. (1998). Soil fertility management in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank Technical Paper No. 408. World Bank. Washington, D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esilaba, A. O., Byalebek, J. B., Delve, R. J., Okalebo, J. R., Ssenyange, D., Mbalule, M. and Ssali, H. (2005). On farm testing of integrated nutrient management strategies in eastern Uganda. Agricultural Systems 86:144165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzel, S., Scherr, S. J., Coe, R., Cooper, P. J. M. and Place, F (2002). Methods for assessing agroforestry adoption potential. In Trees on the Farm: Assessing the Adoption Potential of Agroforestry Practices in Africa, 1136 (Eds Franzel, S. and Sherr, S. J.) Wallingford, UK: CABI.Google Scholar
FURP, (1987). Fertilizer Use Recommendation Project (FURP). Description of first priority trial site in the various Districts. Final Report. Vol. 24. Embu District. National Agricultural Research Laboratories, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Gachengo, C. N., Palm, C. A., Jama, B. and Othieno, C. (1999). Tithonia and senna green manures and inorganic fertilizers as phosphorus sources for maize in western Kenya. Agroforestry Systems 44:2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganunga, R., Terokun, O. and Kumwenda, J. D (1998). Tithonia diversifolia: An organic source of nitrogen and phosphorus for maize in Malawi. In Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in Southern Africa: Taking Stock of Progress. Proceedings of a Conference (8–11 October 2002), Leopard Rock Hotel, Vumba, Zimbabwe, 191–194Google Scholar
Jaetzold, R., Schmidt, H., Hornet, Z. B. and Shisanya, C. A. (2006). Farm Management Handbook of Kenya. Natural Conditions and Farm Information. 2nd Edition. Vol.11/ C. Eastern Province. Ministry of Agriculture/GTZ, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Jama, B., Palm, C. A., Buresh, R. J., Niang, A., Gachengo, C., Nziguheba, G. and Amadalo, B. (2000). Tithonia diversifolia as a green manure for soil fertility improvement in western Kenya: A review. Agroforestry System 49:201221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiri, O. & Waddington, S. R. (1998). Leaf prunings from two species of tithonia raise maize grain yield in Zimbabwe, but take a lot of labour. Newsletter of Soil Fert. NE, Harare, Zimbabwe, Target 16:45.Google Scholar
Kaizzi, C. K., Ssali, H. and Vlek, P. L. G. (2006). Differential use and benefits of velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens Var. utilis) and N fertilizer in maize production in contrasting agro-ecological zones of East Uganda. Agricultural Systems 88:4460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimetu, J. M., Mugendi, D. N., Palm, C. A., Mutuo, P. K., Gachengo, C. N., Bationo, A., Nandwa, S., and Kungu, J. (2004). Nitrogen fertilizer equivalencies by organics of differing quantity and optimum combinations with organic nitrogen source in central Kenya. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 68:127135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumwenda, J. D., Saka, A. R., Kabambe, V. H. and Ganunga, R. P. (1999). Legume manure cover crops-maize rotation trial for 1997/98 and 1998/99 crop seasons. In Maize Commodity Team Annual Research Report (Ed. Kumwenda, J. D.). Chidtedze station, Lilongwe, Malawi.Google Scholar
Lekasi, J. K., Tanner, J. C., Kimani, S. K. and Harris, P. J. C. 2000. Effect of cattle manure on maize productivity under field conditions in a central Kenya highland Nitisol. In Collaborative and Participatory Research for Sustainably Improved Livelihoods. Proceedings of the 7th Biennial Scientific Conference, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI) Nairobi, Kenya, 123–131.Google Scholar
Mugendi, D. N., Nair, P. K. R., Mugwe, J. N., O'Neill, M. K. and Woomer, P. (1999). Alley cropping of maize with calliandra and leucaena in the subhumid highlands of Kenya. Part 1: Soil fertility changes and maize yield. Agroforestry Systems 46:3950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murwira, H. K., Mutuo, P. K., Nhamo, N., Marandu, A. E., Rabeson, R., Mwale, M. and Palm, C. A. (2002). Fertilizer equivalency values of organic materials of different quality In Integrated Nutrient Management in Sub-Saharan Africa: From Concept to Practice. (Eds Vanlauwe, B., Diels, N., Sanginga, N. and Merkx, R.). 113152. Wallingford, UK: CABI.Google Scholar
Mutsaers, H. J. W., Weber, G. K., Walker, P. and Fischer, M. (1997). A Guide for On-farm Experimentation. IITA/CT/ISNAR.Google Scholar
Okalebo, J. R., Gathua, K. W. and Woomer, P. L. (2002). Laboratory Methods of Soil and Plant Analysis: A Working Manual. 2nd edn. TSBF-CIAT and SACRED Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Palm, C. A., Myers, R. J. K. and Nandwa, S. M. (1997). Organic-inorganic nutrient interactions in soil fertility replenishment. In Replenishing Soil Fertility in Africa, 193–217 (Eds Buresh, R. J., Sanchez, P. A. and Calhoun, F.). Soil Science Society of America Special Publication 51: Soil Science Society of America, Madison WI, USA.Google Scholar
Pingali, P. L. (2001). World Maize: Facts and Trends. Meeting World Maize Needs: Technological Opportunities and Priorities for the Public Sector. CIMMYT 19992000. CIMMYT. Mexico, D.F.Google Scholar
Sanchez, P. A. & Jama, B. A. (2002). Soil fertility replenishment takes off in East and Southern Africa. In Integrated Nutrient Management in Sub-Saharan Africa: From Concept to Practice, 2346 (Eds Vanlauwe, B., Diels, N., Sanginga, N., and Merkx, R.). Wallingford, UK: CABI.Google Scholar
Smaling, E. M. A., Nandwa, S. M. and Janssen, B. H. (1997). Soil fertility is at stake. In Replenishing Soil Fertility in Africa: An Investment in Natural Resource Capital, 4761. (Eds Buresh, R. J., Sanchez, P. A., and Calhoun, F.). Soil Science Society of America Special (SSSA) Publication 51: Soil Science Society of America, Madison WI, USA.Google Scholar
Wallace, J. S. (1996). The water balance of mixed tree-crop systems Tree-crop Interaction, a Physiological Approach. (Eds Ong, C. K. and Huxley, P.). Wallingford, UK: CABI.Google Scholar