Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T15:43:31.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photosynthesis below the surface in a cryptic microbial mat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2003

Lynn J. Rothschild
Affiliation:
Ecosystem Science and Technology Branch, Mail Stop 239-20, NASA/Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000, USA e-mail: lrothschild@mail.arc.nasa.gov
Lorraine J. Giver
Affiliation:
Ecosystem Science and Technology Branch, Mail Stop 239-20, NASA/Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000, USA e-mail: lrothschild@mail.arc.nasa.gov Codexis, Inc., 515 Galveston Drive, Redwood City, CA 94063 e-mail: lori.giver@codexis.com

Abstract

The discovery of subsurface communities has encouraged speculation that such communities might be present on planetary bodies exposed to harsh surface conditions, including the early Earth. While the astrobiology community has focused on the deep subsurface, near-subsurface environments are unique in that they provide some protection while allowing partial access to photosynthetically active radiation. Previously we identified near-surface microbial communities based on photosynthesis. Here we assess the productivity of such an ecosystem by measuring in situ carbon fixation rates in an intertidal marine beach through a diurnal cycle, and find them surprisingly productive. Gross fixation along a transect (99×1 m) perpendicular to the shore was highly variable and depended on factors such as moisture and mat type, with a mean of ~41 mg C fixed m−2 day−1. In contrast, an adjacent well-established cyanobacterial mat dominated by Lyngbya aestuarii was ~12 times as productive (~500 mg C fixed m−2 day−1). Measurements made of the Lyngbya mat at several times per year revealed a correlation between total hours of daylight and gross daily production. From these data, annual gross fixation was estimated for the Lyngbya mat and yielded a value of ~1.3×105 g m−2 yr−1. An analysis of pulse-chase data obtained in the study in conjunction with published literature on similar ecosystems suggests that subsurface interstitial mats may be an overlooked endogenous source of organic carbon, mostly in the form of excreted fixed carbon.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)