Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T00:00:57.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The marine biology of law and human health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2015

Thomas Appleby ,
Susan Kinsey ,
Benedict Wheeler  and
Emma Cunningham
Thomas Appleby*
Affiliation:
International Water Security Network, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
Susan Kinsey
Affiliation:
The Marine Conservation Society, Ross-on-Wye, Herefordshire, UK
Benedict Wheeler
Affiliation:
European Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Truro, UK
Emma Cunningham
Affiliation:
The Marine Conservation Society, Ross-on-Wye, Herefordshire, UK
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: T. Appleby, International Water Security Network, University of the West of England, Bristol email: Thomas.Appleby@uwe.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This review uses a multidisciplinary approach to investigate legal issues concerning the oceans and human health. It firstly seeks to define the boundaries of oceans and human health research. We use three case studies as examples: biomedical research, marine litter and human well-being. Biomedical research raises complex issues relating to coastal states’ sovereign rights to exploit their marine resources and the patenting processes. Coastal states have differing degrees of control over research at sea. There are differences in EU and US law over the status of genetic discoveries, with the US having stricter criteria to qualify for patent protection. International law sets the standard for bioprospecting in developing countries under the Nagoya Protocol. The cost and complexity of marine biomedical research mean that it cannot be left to commercial exploration and needs some public funding. The second case study highlights the rise in marine plastics pollution using Marine Conservation Society beachwatch data. It details the need to alter product design to avoid marine pollution and records an unsuccessful attempt by academics and an NGO to make contact with the manufacturers of one polluting product. It also introduces the concept that faulty design could amount to a public nuisance. The third case study highlights the potential health benefits from access to the coast and the statutory responsibility which sits with the US and UK authorities in the provision of well-being. It posits that there needs to be greater inter-agency coordination to promote access to the coast for human well-being.

Keywords

Lawconservationwell-beingoceanshumanhealthbiopiracybioprospectingpatentlitter
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 96 , Issue 1: Oceans and Human Health , February 2016 , pp. 19 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ananthaswamy, A. (2001) Junk food – a diet of plastic pellets plays havoc with animals’ immunity. New Scientist 2274, 20 January 2001.Google Scholar
Andrady, A.L. (2000) Plastics and their impacts in the marine environment. In Proceedings of the International Marine Debris Conference on Derelict Fishing Gear and the Ocean Environment. 6–11 August 2000. Hawai'i Convention Center Honolulu, Hawai'i. Available at: http://hawaiihumpbackwhale.noaa.gov/documents/pdfs_conferences/proceedings.pdf.Google Scholar
Appleby, T.P.S. (2014) The Bud, the Bad and the Ugly. Available at: http://www.isonomia.co.uk/?p=3019.Google Scholar
Arnaud-Haond, S., Arrieta, J.M. and Duarte, C.M. (2011) Marine biodiversity and gene patents. Science 331, doi: 10.1126/science.1200783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arthurs, H.W. (1983) Law and learning: report to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada by the Consultative Group on Research and Education in Law. Ottawa: Information Division, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.Google Scholar
Ashbullby, K.J., Pahl, S., Webley, P. and White, M.P. (2013) The beach as a setting for families’ health promotion: a qualitative study with parents and children living in coastal regions in Southwest England. Health and Place 23, 138–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, R. and Hooker, S. (2000) Ingestion of plastic and unusual prey by a juvenile harbour porpoise. Marine Pollution Bulletin 40, 719–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chynoweth, P. (2009) Legal scholarship: a discipline in tradition, editorial. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment 1, 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Convention on Biological Diversity (2015) Parties to the Nagoya Protocol. Available at: http://www.cbd.int/abs/nagoya-protocol/signatories/default.shtml.Google Scholar
Derraik, J.G.B. (2002) The pollution of the marine environment by plastics: a review. Marine Pollution Bulletin 44, 842–852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gouda, H. (2014) Urban water security: LCA and sanitary waste management. Environmental Scientist 23, 18–23.Google Scholar
Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S. and Frumkin, H. (2014) Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health 35, 207–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Centre for the Environment and Human Heath (2014) Message from Bedruthan. Available at: http://www.ecehh.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Message-from-Bedruthan.pdf.Google Scholar
European Commision (2015) Priority Substances under the Water Framework Directive. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-dangersub/pri_substances.htm.Google Scholar
European Marine Board (2013) Linking Oceans and Human Health: A Strategic Research Priority for Europe. Position paper 19 of the European Marine Board, Ostend, Belgium. Available at: http://www.marineboard.eu/images/publications/Oceans%20and%20Human%20Health-214.pdf.Google Scholar
Global Oceans Commission (2013) Bioprospecting and Marine Genetic Resources on the High Seas. Policy paper 4, A series of policy options relating to third meeting of the Global Oceans Commission, November 2013. Available at: http://www.globaloceancommission.org/wp-content/uploads/GOC-paper04-bioprospecting.pdf.Google Scholar
Global Oceans Commission (2014) From Decline to Recovery: A Rescue Package for the Global Ocean. Global Oceans Commission. Available at: http://issuu.com/missionocean/docs/goc_summary_report/16.Google Scholar
Health and Safety Executive (online) Health and safety legislation – laws in the workplace. Available from: http://www.hse.gov.uk/legislation/.Google Scholar
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (2013) Water quality: priority substances. First Report of Session 2013–14. Available at: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmsctech/272/272i.pdf.Google Scholar
Hughes, I. (2008) Action research in healthcare. In Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (eds) The Sage handbook of action research participative inquiry and practice, 2nd edn.London: Sage.Google Scholar
Laist, D.W. (1997) Impacts of marine debris: entanglement of marine life in marine debris including a comprehensive list of species with entanglement and ingestion records. In Coe, J.M. and Rogers, D.B. (eds) Marine debris, sources, impacts, and solutions. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marine Conservation Society (2014) Beachwatch 2013 – nationwide beach clean and survey report. Ross-on-Wye: MCS.Google Scholar
Mato, Y., Isobe, T., Takada, H., Kanehiro, H., Ohtake, C. and Kaminuma, T. (2001) Plastic resin pellets as a transport medium for toxic chemicals in the marine environment. Environmental Science and Technology 35, 318–324, doi: 10.1021/es0010498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mossop, J. (2007) Protecting marine biodiversity on the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles. Ocean Development and International Law 38, 283–304. doi: 10.1080/00908320701530474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natural England (2013) Monitor of Engagement with the Natural Environment: The national survey on people and the natural environment. Annual Report from the 2012–13 Survey. London: Natural England.Google Scholar
Oceans and Human Health Act (online) H.R.4818 Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005. Available from: https://www.eol.ucar.edu/projects/ohhi/documents/OHH_final_act_in_approps.pdf.Google Scholar
Odell-West, A. (2011) “Gene”-uinely patentable? The distinction in biotechnology between discovery and invention in US and EU patent law. Intellectual Property Quarterly 3, 304–321.Google Scholar
Oldham, P., Hall, S. and Forero, O. (2012) Biological diversity in the patent system. PLoS ONE 8, e78737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packforsk (1989) Report on photo-degradability of the Hi-Cone EcoCarrier in comparison with other types of beverage packaging. Sweden.Google Scholar
Pemberton, D., Brothers, N.P. and Kirkwood, R. (1992) Entanglement of Australian fur seals in man-made debris in Tasmanian waters. Wildlife Research 19, 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Practical Law Company (2015) Guidance Note. Available from: http://uk.practicallaw.com/8-107-6896.Google Scholar
Reijnders, P.J.H. (1982) On the ecology of the harbour seal Phoca vitulina in the Wadden Sea: population dynamics, residue levels, and management. Veterinary Quarterly 4, 36–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, P.G., Connell, A.D. and Gardener, B.D. (1990) Plastic ingestion and PCBs in seabirds: is there a relationship? Marine Pollution Bulletin 19, 174–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takada, H., Mato, Y., Endo, S., Yamashita, R. and Zakaria, M. (2006). Pellet Watch: global monitoring of persistent organic pollutants using beached plastic resin pellets. Marine Pollution Bulletin 52, 547–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Crown Estate (2015) The Crown Estate Map. Available from: http://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/estates-map/.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. and Hoare, C. (1997) Microscopic plastic – a shore thing. Marine Conservation 3, 4.Google Scholar
Thompson, R.C., Olsen, Y., Mitchell, R.P., Davis, A., Rowland, S.J., John, A.W.G., McGonigle, D. and Russell, A.E. (2004) Lost at sea: where does all the plastic go? Science 304, 838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations (online) UN Water. Available from: http://www.unwater.org/topics/water-security/en/.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme (2005) Marine Litter, an Analytical Overview. Available from: http://www.unep.org/regionalseas/marinelitter/publications/docs/anl_oview.pdf.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme (online) Environmental Security. Available from: http://www.unep.org/roe/KeyActivities/EnvironmentalSecurity/tabid/54360/Default.aspx.Google Scholar
Wheeler, B.W., White, M., Stahl-Timmins, W. and Depledge, M.H. (2012) Does living by the coast improve health and wellbeing? Health and Place 18, 1198–1201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, M.P., Alcock, I., Wheeler, B.W. and Depledge, M.H. (2013) Coastal proximity, health and well-being: results from a longitudinal panel survey. Health and Place 23, 97–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, M.P., Wheeler, B.W., Herbert, S., Alcock, I. and Depledge, M.H. (2014) Coastal proximity and physical activity: is the coast an under-appreciated public health resource? Preventive Medicine 69, 135–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiig, O., Derocher, A.E., Cronin, M. and Skaare, J.U. (1998) Female pseudohermaphrodite polar bears at Svalbard. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 34, 792–796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, A.T., Tudor, D.T. and Randerson, P. (2003) Beach litter sourcing in the Bristol Channel and Wales, UK. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 143, 387–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar