Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:52:42.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Problem of Single-Party Predominance in an Unconsolidated Democracy: The Example of Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2009

Leslie E. Anderson
Leslie E. Anderson
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Parties can be a crucial to democratic function but not all parties or party systems are democratic. Some parties are fully competitive within a pluralist system while others, notably hegemonic parties, are antithetical to democracy. Between competitive, pluralist party systems and hegemonic party systems lie predominant party systems. These are compatible with democracy where democracy is fully consolidated but inhibit democratic consolidation in settings with an authoritarian history or where the rule of law is incomplete. The effect of predominant parties in unconsolidated democracies has not been fully studied in comparative context. I scrutinize this problem in Argentina, which has followed an electoral calendar for two decades, but lacks a fully pluralist system of power-sharing among two nationally-competitive parties. The authoritarian background of Peronism, of Argentina itself and the limited competitive potential of the Radical Party have curtailed democratic development. The article underscores the seriousness of Argentina's dilemma by contrasting its situation with Democratic Party predominance in the United States Deep South in the 1940s. The comparison of democratic development in an older democracy with that of a newer democracy illustrates that some of the processes of consolidation are similar and that the experience of older democracies may indicate possible solutions for newer democracies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 767 - 784
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Leslie E. 1994. The Political Ecology of the Modern Peasant: Calculation and Community. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Leslie E. 2002. Of wild and cultivated politics: Conflict and democracy in Argentina. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 16 (1): 99–132.Google Scholar
Anderson, Leslie E. Forthcoming, Social Capital in Developing Democracies: Argentina and Nicaragua. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Leslie E., and Dodd, Lawrence C.. 2005. Learning Democracy: Citizen Engagement and Electoral Choice in Nicaragua, 1990–2001. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Leslie E., and Dodd, Lawrence C.. 2009. Nicaragua: Progress amid regress? Journal of Democracy 20 (3): 153–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubrac, Raymond. 1997. The French Resistance, 1940–1944. Paris: Hazan, translated from the French by Louise Guiney.Google Scholar
Auyero, Javier. 2001. Poor People's Politics: Peronist Survival Networks and the Legacy of Evita. Durham, NC.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Auyero, Javier. 2007. Routine Politics and Violence in Argentina: The Gray Zone of State Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botano, Natalio. 1986. El orden conservador. Buenos Aires: Hyspanamerica.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 1998. Subversive Institutions: The Design and the Destruction of Socialism and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, David J. 1969. Charisma, migration, and elite coalescence: An interpretation of Peronism. Comparative Politics 1 (3): 423–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, Susan, and , Peter. 1989. Argentina: Political Culture and Instability. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A.. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cavarozzi, Marcelo. 2002. Autoritarismo y Democracia. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.Google Scholar
Chavez, Rebecca Bill. 2004. The Rule of Law in Nascent Democracie: Judicial Politics in Argentinas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cheresky, Isidoro, and Pousadela, Inés. 2004. El voto liberado. Elecciones 2003: perspective historica y studio de casos. Buenos Aires: Biblios.Google Scholar
Clinton, Alan. 2002. Jean Moulin, 1899–1943: The French Resistance and the Republic. Houndmills, UK and New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New York: Yale University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Di Tella, Guido. 1983. Argentina Under Perón, 1973–1976. London: Macmillan, 1983.Google Scholar
Diario de Sesiones, Cámara de Diputados, Congreso de las Nación, 1946–1955.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Susan. 1986. The Poverty of Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Etchepareborda, Roberto, ed. 1955. Leandro Alèm, Mensaje y Destino. Buenos Aires: Editorial Raigal.Google Scholar
Ferla, Salvador. 1974. La Tercera Posición Ideológica y Apreciaciones Sobre el Retorno de Perón. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Meridiano.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 1994. The difficult transition from clientelism to citizenship: Lessons from Mexico. World Politics 46 (2): 151–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 2008. Accountability Politics: Power and Voice in Rural Mexico. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hagopian, Frances. 1996. Traditional Politics and Regime Change in Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hahn, Steven. 2003. A Nation Under Our Feet: Black Political Struggles in the Rural South from Slavery to the Great Migration. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Halperin Donghi, Tulio. 1994. La larga agonía de la Argentina personista. Buenos Aires: Ariel, 1994.Google Scholar
Holt, Michael. 1978. The Political Crisis of the 1950s. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
James, Daniel. 1988. Resistance and Integration: Peronism and the Argentine Working Class, 1946–1976. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Key, V.O. 1984. Southern Politics in State and Nation. Knoxville, TN: The University of Tennessee Press, original printing, Alfred A. Knoph, 1949.Google Scholar
Kohli, Atul. 1990. Democracy and Discontent: India's Growing Crisis of Governability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, Steven. 2003. Civil Rights Crossroads: Nation, Community and the Black Freedom Struggle. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor-based Parties in Latin America, Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2008. Crisis, party adaptation and regime stability in Argentina: The case of Peronism, 1989–1994. Party Politics 4 (4): 445–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2008. Argentina from Kirchner to Kirchner. Journal of Democracy 19 (2): 16–30.Google Scholar
Llanos, Mariana. 2002. Privatization and Democracy in Argentina. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Luna, Felix. 1958. Alvear. Buenos Aires: Hyspanamerica.Google Scholar
Madsen, Douglas, and Snow, Peter G.. 1991. The Charismatic Bond: Political Behavior in Time of Crisis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy R.. 1995. Introduction: Party systems in Latin America. In Building Democratic Institutions. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Zoco, Edurne. 2007. Political sequences and the stabilization of interparty competition: Electoral volatility in old and new democracies. Party Politics 13 (2): 155–178.Google Scholar
McGuire, James. 1995. Political parties and democracy in Argentina. In Building Democratic Institutions, ed. Mainwaring, S. and R, Timothy. Scully, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McGuire, James. 1997. Peronism Without Peron: Unions, Parties and Democracy in Argentina. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Medina, Juan Abal. 2004. Los partidos politicos. Un mal necesario? Buenos Aires: Capital Intelectual.Google Scholar
Merkel, Wolfgang. 2004. Embedded and defective democracies. Democratization 11 (5): 33–58.Google Scholar
Molinelli, Guillermo N. 1989. Colegios Electorales y Asambleas Legislativas, 1854–1893. Buenos Aires: Manantial.Google Scholar
Mora y Araujo, Manuel 3d., 1980. Las Bases Estructurales del Peronismo, ed. Mora y Araujo, e Llorente, Ignacio, El Voto Peronista: Ensayos de Sociología Electoral Argentina. Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Mustapic, Ana Maria. 1984. Conflictos institucionales durante el primer gobierno radical: 1916–1922. Desarollo Economico 24: 85–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nación, La. 1997. May 16–31.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1977. Estado y alianzas en la Argentina, 1956–1976. Desarollo Economico 16: 523–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. Delegative democracy. Journal of Democracy 5 (1): 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 2004. Why the Rule of Law Matters. Journal of Democracy 15 (4): 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oi, Jean. 1985. Communism and clientelism: Rural politics in China. World Politics 27 (2): 238–266.Google Scholar
Pempel, T.J. ed. 1990. Uncommon Democracies: The One-party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Perón, Juan. nd. La Tercera Posición: Doctrina del General Perón, Buenos Aires: Presidencia de la Nacion, Secretaria de Prensa y Difusion.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson. 2004. How Congress Evolves: Social Bases of Institutional Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Puryear, Jeffrey. 1994. Thinking Politics: Intellectuals and Democracy in Chile, 1973–1988. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rein, Raanan. 2008. In the Shadow of Perón: Juan Atilio Bramuglia and the Second Line of Argentina's Populist Movement. Stanford: Stanford University Press, originally published as Juan Atilio Bramuglia: Bajo la sombra del lider. La segunda linea de liderazgo peronista. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Lumiere, 2006.Google Scholar
Reynoso, Diego. 2007. “La Victoria K: radiografia de la elección presidencial del 2007,” (FEPADE Difunde, México, # 14).Google Scholar
Rouquie, Alain. 1967. Le movement Frondizi et le radicalisme argentin. Paris: Fondation Nationale Des Sciences Politiques.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Senen Gonzalez, Santiago, and Welp, Yanina. 1999. “Illia y La Toma de Fabricas.” Todo Es Historia, # 383, June, pp. 8–25.Google Scholar
Shannon, J.B. 1939a. Presidential Politics in the South: 1938, I. Journal of Politics I: 146–170.Google Scholar
Shannon, J.B. 1939b. Presidential Politics in the South: 1938, II. Journal of Politics II: 278–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumway, Nicolas. 1991. The Invention of Argentina. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter. 1972. The social basis of Peronism. Hispanic American Historical Review 52: 55–73.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter. 1974. “Las Elecciones de 1946 y las Inferencias Ecologicas,” In Mora y Arujo, Manuel, ed., El Voto Peronista: Ensayos de Sociología Electoral Argentina, Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Snow, Peter G. 1972. Argentine Political Parties and the 1966 Revolution. Buffalo, N.Y.: Council on International Studies.Google Scholar
Stanley, Harold W. 1975. Senate v. Governor, Alabama, 1971: Referents for Opposition in a One-Party Legislature. University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, Harold W. 1987. Voter Mobilization and the Politics of Race: The South and Universal Suffrage, 1952–1984. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan. 2002. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swenson, Peter A. 2002. Capitalists against Markets: The Making of Labor Markets and Welfare States in the United States and Sweden. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tcach, Cesar. 2000. Radicalismo y Fuerzas Armadas (1962–1963): Observaciones Desde Cordoba. Desarollo Economico 40 (157): 73–95.Google Scholar
Tcach, Cesar. 1991. Sabattinismo y Peronismo: Partidos Politicos in Córdoba, 1943–1955. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Walker, Thomas W. ed. 1982. Nicaragua in Revolution. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2000. Forging Democracy from Below: Insurgent Transitions in South Africa and El Salvador. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar