Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T06:07:24.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vertebral Variation in Teleostean Fishes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

E. Ford
E. Ford
Affiliation:
Assistant Director of the Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the publication of Heincke's classic treatise on the herring the counting of vertebrae has become a standard operation in the biometric analysis of samples of teleostean fishes taken at random from local populations. But while such routine counting has undoubtedly added greatly to our knowledge of the incidence and magnitude of vertebral variation in a number of economically important species, it has occasioned no little confliction of opinion as to the significance of this variation. Difficulties arising out of my own work on the herring at Plymouth have led me to make a general study of the teleostean backbone in as many species as possible, in an endeavour to learn more of the nature, extent and cause of vertebral variation. After examining over one hundred species, mostly from local waters, I have come to the conclusion that the subject presents a great and varied field of research which is at present but little explored. It would be idle to suggest, therefore, that the present paper should be considered as anything more than an introductory survey of the many problems awaiting detailed investigation. Even so, it may serve to indicate the scope and present position of the Plymouth studies, and prepare the way for fuller work in the future, both at Plymouth and elsewhere.

I have received the greatest assistance from Mr L. S. Wisdom, Laboratory Attendant at the Plymouth Laboratory, whose skill in preparing skeletons for study, and keen interest in all matters relating to the research, I most gratefully acknowledge.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , November 1937 , pp. 1 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrington, E. J. W., 1937. The structure and development of the tail in the plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) and the cod (Gadus morrhua). Quart. Journ. Micr. Soc., Vol. 79, pp. 447–69.Google Scholar
Bateson, W., 1894. Materials for the Study of Variation. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Cole, F. J. & Johnstone, J., 1901. Pleuronectes (the plaice). L.M.B.C. Memoir VIII.Google Scholar
Ford, E. & Bull, H. O., 1926. Abnormal vertebrae in the herring. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XIV, pp. 509–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, E., 1930. Herring investigations at Plymouth. VIII. The transition from larva to adolescent. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVI, pp. 723–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, E., 1931a. Growth in length during the transition from larva to adolescent in the pilchard and sprat. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVII, pp. 977–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, E., 1931b. Changes in length during the larval life and metamorphosis of the fresh water eel (Anguilla vulgaris Turt.). Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVII, pp. 987–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, E., 1933. The “number of vertebrae” in the herring and its variation. Journ. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer, Vol. VIII, pp. 211–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J., 1933a. The Muscular Movements of Fishes. Royal Institution of Great Britain.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J., 1933b. Studies in animal locomotion. I, II and III. Journ. Exp. Biol., Vol. X, pp. 88–104 and 386–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kändler, R., 1932. Unsicherheiten bei Bestimmung der Wirbelzahl infolge Verwachsungserscheinungen. Journ. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer, Vol. VII pp. 373–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kishinouye, K., 1923. Contributions to the comparative study of the so-called Scombroid fishes. Journ. Coll. Agric., Imp. Univ. Tokyo, Vol. VIII, pp. 293–475.Google Scholar
Kyle, H. M., 1926. The Biology of Fishes. London: Sidgwick and Jackson, Ltd.Google Scholar
Norman, J. R., 1935. Fishes. List of British Vertebrates, British Museum (Natural History), pp. 40–66.Google Scholar
Norman, J. R., 1934. Monograph of the Flatfishes, Vol. I. British Museum (Natural History), London.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J., 1921. Racial investigations. VIII. The numerical signification of fused vertebrae. C.R. Trav. Carlsberg, Vol. XIV, No. 16.Google Scholar
Schnakenbeck, W., 1931. Zum Rassenproblem bei den Fischen. Zeitschr. f. Wiss. Biol., Abt. A, Zeitschr. f. Morphol. u. Ökol. d. Tiere, Band 21, Heft ¾, pp. 409–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenstrup, J. & Lütken, Chr., 1898. Bidrag til Kundskab om Klump-eller Maanefiskene (Molidae). Mémoires de. l' Académie Royale des Science et des Lettres de Danemark, Copenhague, 6me série, Section des Sciences, t. IX, No. 1.Google Scholar
Thompson, D'Arcy W., 1917. On Growth and Form. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, R. H., 1910. The caudal fin of the Teleostomi. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, pp. 590–627.Google Scholar