Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:25:25.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of seed row and foliar applied pesticides on the yield of lucerne in clay soil, in the presence or absence of lucerne stem nematode, Ditylenchus dipsaci

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. G. Whitehead  and
D. J. Tite
A. G. Whitehead
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Research Council, Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ
D. J. Tite
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Research Council, Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Carbofuran at 1·5 kg a.i./ha applied around the seeds during sowing in spring controlled lucerne stem nematode and Sitona damage to lucerne and increased herbage yields in the susceptible cv. Europe. Such treatment was also beneficial to Europe in soil not infested with lucerne stem nematode and to the ‘resistant’ cv. Euver sown in infested soil. Subsequent treatment of the soil in spring each year with thiabendazole did not enhance lucerne yield but aldicarb at 1·5 kg a.i./ha watered onto the stubble and hydraulic or electrostatic sprays of carbendazim, thiabendazole hypophosphite, thiodicarb, dimethoate or pirimiphos methyl applied to new foliage after each herbage harvest lessened stem nematode injury and increased herbage yields in one experiment but had less or no effect in another.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 110 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 279 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abivardi, C. & Sharafeh, M. (1975). Laboratory and field evaluation of seven insecticides for control of the alfalfa stem nematode, Ditylenchus dipsachi (Kühn 1857) Filipjev 1936. Nematologia Mediterranea 3, 75–81.Google Scholar
Belanger, G., Winch, J. E. & Townshend, J. L. (1985). Carbofuran effects on establishment of legumes in relation to plant growth, nitrogen fixation and soil nematodes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 65, 423–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergeson, G. B. (1955). The use of systemic phosphates for control of Ditylenchus dipsaci on alfalfa and daffodils. Plant Disease Reporter 39, 705–709.Google Scholar
Giroud, P. (1978). Déshydratation de luzerne avec extraction de proteines et d'énergie. Industries Alimentaires el Agricoles, Sept.–Oct. 1978 (extract from this review published by France-Luzerne).Google Scholar
Greenwood, P. B., Yeates, G. W. & Sheath, G. W. (1984). Effect of nematicide on stem nematode (Ditylenchus dipsaci) populations and productivity, and survival of three lucerne cultivars in North Otago. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 27, 557–562.Google Scholar
Griffin, G. D. (1967). Chemical control of the stem nematode Ditylenchus dipsaci. Plant Disease Reporter 51, 973–974.Google Scholar
Hooper, D. J. (1984). Observations on stem nematode, Ditylenchus dipsaci, attacking field beans, Vicia faba. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1983, pp. 239–260.Google Scholar
Russell, C. C. (1971). Ditylenchus dipsaci – alfalfa nematicide trials. Proceedings of Oklahoma Agricultural Chemical Conference, pp. 74–75.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. G. (1984). Interaction of three lucerne cultivars and eleven English isolates of stem nematode (Ditylenchus dipsaci), ‘lucerne race’. Plant Pathology 33, 33–37.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. G., Fraser, J. E. & Nichols, A. J. F. (1987). Variation in the development of stem nematodes, Ditylenchus dipsaci, in susceptible and resistant crop plants. Annals of Applied Biology 111, 373–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, J. C. & Busbice, T. H. (1968). Effects of temperature and incubation period on the expression of resistance to stem nematode in alfalfa. Crop Science 8, 179–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar