Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:34:31.753Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quality of Government: Toward a More Complex Definition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2013

MARCUS AGNAFORS
MARCUS AGNAFORS*
Affiliation:
Lund University
*
Marcus Agnafors is a Postdoctoral Researcher at Lund University, Department of Philosophy, Kungshuset, Lundagård, SE-222 22 Lund, Sweden (marcus.agnafors@fil.lu.se).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Concepts such as “quality of government” and “good governance” refer to a desired character of the exercise of public authority. Recently the interest in good governance, the quality of government, and similar concepts has increased considerably. However, despite this increasing interest and use, an adequate definition of the concept of quality of government has proved difficult to find. This article criticizes recent attempts at such a definition and proposes an alternative, more complex definition that includes moral content and also encompasses a plurality of values and virtues at its core. An acceptable definition of the quality of governance must be consistent with the demands of a public ethos, the virtues of good decision making and reason giving, the rule of law, efficiency, stability, and a principle of beneficence. The article describes these components in detail and the relations among them.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 107 , Issue 3 , August 2013 , pp. 433 - 445
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adserà, Alícia, Boix, Carles, and Payne, Mark. 2003. “Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 19 (2): 445–490.Google Scholar
Agnafors, Marcus. 2012. “When Do We Share Moral Norms?” Journal of Value Inquiry 46: 303–15.Google Scholar
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. 2006. Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian. 2001. Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom, and Childress, James. 2009. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bok, Sissela. 1995. Common Values. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Carleheden, Mikael, and Gabriëls, René. 1997. “An Interview with Michael Walzer.” Theory, Culture & Society 14 (1): 113–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charron, Nicholas, and Lapuente, Victor. 2010. “Does Democracy Produce Quality of Government?” European Journal of Political Research 49: 443–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charron, Nicholas, Lapuente, Victor, and Rothstein, Bo. 2011. Korruption i Europa: En analys av samhällsstyrningens kvalitet på nationell och regional nivå i EU:s medlemsstater. Stockholm: SIEPS, 2011:5.Google Scholar
Cohen, Gerald. 2009. Why Not Socialism? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Daniels, Norman. 1979. “Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics.” Journal of Philosophy 76 (5): 256–82.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2003. Universal Human Rights in Theory & Practice. 2nd ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Doornbos, Martin. 2001. “‘Good Governance’: The Rise and Decline of a Policy Metaphor?” Journal of Development Studies 37 (6): 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1983. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gert, Bernard. 2004. Common Morality: Deciding What to Do. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, John, Amos, Bruce, and Plumptre, Tim. 2003. Principles for Good Governance in the 21st Century. Institute on Governance Policy Brief No. 15. Ottawa: Institute of Governance.Google Scholar
Griffin, James. 2008. On Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grindle, Merilee. 2007. “Good Enough Governance Revisited.” Development Policy Review 25 (5): 553–74.Google Scholar
Hewitt de Alcántara, Cynthia. 1998. “Uses and Abuses of the Concept of Governance.” International Social Science Journal 50 (155): 105–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Sören, Rothstein, Bo, and Nasiritousi, Naghmeh. 2009. “Quality of Government: What You Get.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 135–61.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael. 2000. Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart, and Mastruzzi, Massimo. 2009. Governance Matters VIII. Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators 1996–2008. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4978. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart, and Mastruzzi, Massimo. 2010. The Worldwide Governance Indicators. Methodology and Analytical Issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Keefer, Philip. 2004. A Review of the Political Economy of Governance: From Property Right to Voice. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3315. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Küng, Hans. 1997. A Global Ethic for Global Politics and Economics. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, Schleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert. 1999. “The Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 15 (1): 222–79.Google Scholar
Mkandawire, Thandike. 2007. “‘Good Governance’: The Itinerary of an Idea.” Development in Practice 17 (4–5): 679–81.Google Scholar
Nanda, Ved. 2006. “The ‘Good Governance’ Concept Revisited.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 603: 269–83.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 2004. “Why the Rule of Law Matters.” Journal of Democracy 15 (4): 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orend, Brian. 2002. Human Rights: Concepts and Contexts. Peterborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Petersson, Bo. 1998. “Wide Reflective Equilibrium and the Justification of Moral Theory.” In Reflective Equilibrium: Essays in Honour of Robert Heeger, eds. Van der Burg, Wibren and van Willigenburg, Theodoor. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 127–34.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. [1971] 1999. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1974–75. “The Independence of Moral Theory.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 48: 5–22.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. [1993] 1996. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. The Law of Peoples—with “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1999. “The Rule of Law and Its Virtue.” In Raz, Joseph, The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 210–29.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Bo. 2011. The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust, and Inequality in International Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Bo, and Teorell, Jan. 2008a. “What is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions.” Governance 21 (2): 165–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Bo, and Teorell, Jan. 2008b. “Impartiality as a Basic Norm for the Quality of Government: A Reply to Francisco Longo and Graham Wilson.” Governance 21 (2): 201–04.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Bo, and Teorell, Jan. 2012. “Defining and Measuring Quality of Government.” In Good Government: The Relevance of Political Science, eds. Holmberg, Sören and Rothstein, Bo. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Press, 13–39.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Shue, Henry. 1996. Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy. 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Teorell, Jan. 2009. The Impact of Quality of Government as Impartiality: Theory and Evidence. QoG Working Paper Series 2009:25. Gothenburg: Quality of Government Institute.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1977. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1987. Interpretation and Social Criticism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1990. “Nation and Universe.” In The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol. 11, ed. Peterson, Grethe. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 507–66.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1994. Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1995. “Response.” In Pluralism, Justice, and Equality, eds. Miller, David and Walzer, Michael. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 281–97.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 2003. “Can There Be a Moral Foreign Policy?” In Liberty and Power: A Dialogue on Religion and U.S. Foreign Policy in an Unjust World, ed. Hehir, Bryan. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 34–52.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 2007. “Beyond Humanitarian Intervention: Human Rights in Global Society” In Thinking Politically: Essays in Political Theory, ed. Miller, David. New Haven: Yale University Press, 251–63.Google Scholar
Weiss, Thomas. 2000. “Governance, Good Governance and Global Governance: Conceptual and Actual Challenges.” Third World Quarterly 21 (5): 795–814.Google Scholar
Woods, Ngaire. 2000. “The Challenge of Good Governance for the IMF and the World Bank Themselves.” World Development 28 (5): 823–41.Google Scholar