Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:19:16.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Representation and the Rules of the Game: An Electoral Simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2009

Donna R. Hoffman
Donna R. Hoffman
Affiliation:
University of Northern Iowa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is often a difficult proposition for introductory American government students to comprehend different electoral systems and how the rules of the game affect the representation that results. I have developed a simulation in which different proportional-based electoral systems are compared with a single-member plurality electoral system. In addition, the simulation can also serve to illustrate other concepts commonly introduced in introductory courses.

Type
The Teacher
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , July 2009 , pp. 531 - 535
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cox, Robert. 1993. “Why it Is Difficult to Teach Comparative Politics to American Students.” PS: Political Science and Politics 26: 68–72.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Ronkowski, Shirley A.. 1997. “Learning Styles of Political Science Students.” PS: Political Science and Politics 30: 732–37.Google Scholar
Guinier, Lani. 1994. The Tyranny of the Majority. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1990. “The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws, 1945–85.” American Political Science Review 84: 481–96.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew, Reilly, Ben, and Ellis, Andrew. 2005. Electoral System Design: The New International IDEA Handbook. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
Riedwyl, Hans, and Steiner, Jurg. 1995. “What is Proportionality Anyway?” Comparative Politics 27: 357–69.Google Scholar
Smith, Elizabeth T., and Boyer, Mark A.. 1996. “Designing In-Class Simulations.” PS: Political Science and Politics 29: 690–94.Google Scholar