Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:13:28.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Intercountry Adoption: Explaining Variation in the Legal Requirements of Sub-Saharan African Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Marijke Breuning  and
John Ishiyama
Marijke Breuning
Affiliation:
University of North Texas. E-mail: marijke.breuning@unt.edu
John Ishiyama
Affiliation:
University of North Texas. E-mail: john.ishiyama@unt.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What determines whether a country has more or less restrictive policies regarding intercountry adoption? Despite the growing importance of intercountry adoption as a political issue, and as an explicitly human face of globalization, there is virtually no systematic empirical work on intercountry adoption. We introduce a measure of the restrictiveness of the adoption laws in Sub-Saharan African countries and test possible explanations for the variations in legal restrictions on intercountry adoption among these countries.

Factors that are commonly cited as explanations for the restrictiveness of intercountry adoption policies do not hold up very well in our assessment. Openness to adoption is not determined by the severity of the orphan crisis or the AIDS crisis within the sending country, nor are democratic countries more responsive to the needs of their orphans. Additionally, African signatories to the Hague Convention, which aimed to increase transparency and accountability in intercountry adoption, tend to be among the most restrictive. On the other hand, a stronger connection with the global economy is associated with greater openness to intercountry adoption. We conclude with a discussion of the implications for orphans and for intercountry adoption.

Type
Research Article
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 89 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altstein, Howard, and Simon, Rita J., eds. 1991. Intercountry Adoption: A Multinational Perspective. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Andrew, Anita M. 2007. China's abandoned children and transracial adoption: Issues and problems for U.S.-China relations, adoption agencies, and adoptive parents. Journal of Women's History 19 (1): 123–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargach, Jamila. 2002. Orphans of Islam: Family, Abandonment, and Secret Adoption in Morocco. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bartholet, Elizabeth. 1993a. Family Bonds: Adoption and the Politics of Parenting. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Bartholet, Elizabeth. 1993b. International adoption: Current status and future prospects. The Future of Children 3 (1): 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholet, Elizabeth. 2005. International adoption. In Children and Youth in Adoption, Orphanages and Foster Care, ed. Askeland, Lori. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Bartholet, Elizabeth. 2007. International adoption: Thoughts on the human rights issues. Buffalo Human Rights Law Review 13 (1): 151–203.Google Scholar
Bartholet, Elizabeth. 2008. International adoption: The child's story. Georgia State University Law Review 24 (Winter 2007).Google Scholar
Case, Anne, Paxson, Christina, and Ableidinger, Joseph. 2004. Orphans in Africa: Parental death, poverty and school enrollment. Demography 41 (3): 483–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collinson, Anne. 2007. The littlest immigrants: Cross border adoption in the Americas, policy, and women's history. Journal of Women's History 19 (1): 132–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubinsky, Karen. 2007. Babies without borders: Rescue, kidnap, and the symbolic child. Journal of Women's History 19 (1): 142–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, David K., and Miguel, Edward. 2007. Orphans and schooling in Africa: A longitudinal analysis. Demography 44 (1): 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogg-Davis, Hawley. 2002. The Ethics of Transracial Adoption. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freivalds, Susan. 2006. The Hague Convention: In treaty we trust. Adoptive Families 39 (4): 41–4.Google Scholar
Grassly, Nicholas C., and Timaeus, Ian M.. 2003. “Orphans and AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Workshop on HIV/AIDS and Adult Mortality in Developing Countries, Population Division, United Nations, New York, September 8–13.Google Scholar
Greene, Melissa Faye. 2006. There Is No Me without You: One Woman's Odyssey to Rescue Africa's Children. New York: Bloombury.Google Scholar
Hague Conference on Private International Law (HccH). 1993. “Hague Convention of 29 May 1993 on Protection of Children and Co-Operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption Convention.”http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=69, accessed May 31, 2007.Google Scholar
Hague Conference on Private International Law (HccH). 2007. “Status Table of the Adoption Convention.”http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.status&cid=69, accessed May 31, 2007.Google Scholar
Harman, Danna. 2007. “Madonna and (an African) Child.” Christian Science Monitor, August 23.Google Scholar
Haslanger, Sally, and Witt, Charlotte. 2005. Introduction: Kith, kin, and family. In Adoption Matters: Philosophical and Feminist Essays, ed. Haslanger, Sally and Witt, Charlotte. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Held, David. 2006. Models of Democracy, 3d ed.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, Leslie Doty. 2003. International adoption among families in the United States: Considerations of social justice. Social Work 48 (2): 209–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, Kay. 2002. Politics of international and domestic adoption in China. Law and Society Review 36 (2): 379–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapstein, Ethan B. 2003. The baby trade. Foreign Affairs 82 (6): 115–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larry King Live. 2006. “Inside Madonna's Adoption Controversy.” Transcript. CNN, October 18.Google Scholar
Masson, Judith. 2001. Intercountry adoption: A global problem or a global solution? Journal of International Affairs 55 (1): 141–66.Google Scholar
Menozzi, Clare, and Mirkin, Barry. 2007. “Child Adoption: Path to Parenthood?” Presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, New York, March 29–31.Google Scholar
Monash, Roeland, and Boerma, J. Ties. 2004. Orphanhood and childcare patterns in sub-Saharan Africa: An analysis of national surveys from 40 countries. AIDS 18 (Supplement 2): S55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization of African Unity (OAU). 1990. “African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of Children.”http://www.africa-union.org/root/au/Documents/Treaties/Text/A.%20C.%20ON%20THE%20RIGHT%20AND%20WELF%20OF%20CHILD.pdf, accessed April 22, 2008.Google Scholar
Roby, Jini L., and Shaw, Stacey A.. 2006. The African orphan crisis and international adoption. Social Work 51 (3): 199–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunders, Robert A. 2006. “Transnational Reproduction and its Discontents: The Politics of Intercountry Adoption in a Global Society.” Presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, San Diego, CA, March 22–25.Google Scholar
Selinske, Joanne, Naughton, Dana, Flanagan, Kathleen, Fry, Peter, and Pickles, Alison. 2001. Ensuring the best interest of the child in intercountry adoption practice: Case studies from the United Kingdom and the United States. Child Welfare 80 (5): 656–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Simon, Rita J., and Altstein, Howard. 2000. Adoption across Borders: Serving Children in Transracial and Intercountry Adoptions. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Sorensen, Georg. 2007. Democracy and Democratization. New York: Perseus.Google Scholar
UNAIDS. 2006. Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic: A UNAIDS 10th Anniversary Special Edition. http://www.unaids.org/en/HIV_data/2006GlobalReport/default.asp, accessed June 5, 2007.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. 2006. “Implementation of the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption.” Fact sheet dated February 15. http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2006/61274.htm, accessed May 31, 2007.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. 2007a “Immigrant Visas Issued to Orphans Coming to the U.S.”http://travel.state.gov/family/adoption/stats/stats_451.html, accessed May 31, 2007.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. 2007b. “Adoption of Children from Countries in which Islamic Shari'a Law is Observed.”http://travel.state.gov/family/adoption/intercountry/intercountry_3132.html, accessed June 2, 2007.Google Scholar
U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). 1993. “Intercountry Adoption: Procedures Are Reasonable, but Sometimes Inefficiently Administered.” Report to the Honorable Arlen Specter, U.S. Senate. GAO/NSIAD-93-83.Google Scholar
U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2005. “Foreign Affairs: Agencies Have Improved the Intercountry Adoption Process, but Further Enhancement Are Needed.” Report to the Chairman, Committee on Foreign Relations, U.S. Senate. GAO-06-133.Google Scholar
Varnis, Steven L. 2001. “Promoting Child Protection through Community Resources: Care Arrangements for Ethiopian AIDS Orphans.” Northeast African Studies 8 (1): 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vonk, M. Elizabeth, Simms, Peggy J., and Nackerud, Larry. 1999. Political and personal aspects of Intercountry adoption of Chinese children in the United States. Families in Society 80 (5): 496–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2006. World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Factbook. 2007. Accessed at https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/.Google Scholar