Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T01:22:55.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Content and bioaccessibility of carotenoids from sweet peppers (Capsicum annuum L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2010

S. A. Aherne
Affiliation:
School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
L. O'sullivan
Affiliation:
School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
M. A. Jiwan
Affiliation:
School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
T. Daly
Affiliation:
School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
N. M. O'brien
Affiliation:
School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2010

Peppers are a rich source of carotenoids and are one of the top ten contributors to the dietary intake of the carotenoids lutein and zeaxanthin in both the Republic of Ireland and Spain(Reference Maiani, Periago Caston and Catasta1). Therefore, we determined the content and bioaccessibility of carotenoids from red, green and yellow sweet (Bell) peppers. Carotenoid bioaccessibility, which is defined as the amounts of carotenoid(s) that are available for absorption in the gut after digestion, is a good indicator of carotenoid bioavailability(Reference O'Sullivan, Ryan and Aherne2, Reference Garrett, Failla and Sarama3).

Red, green and yellow peppers, which originated in Spain, were purchased from a well-known supermarket chain. All manipulations with the vegetables were performed under subdued (yellow) light to minimise carotenoid photodegradation. Each food was weighed (2 g), homogenised and subjected to an in vitro digestion procedure(Reference O'Sullivan, Ryan and Aherne2, Reference Garrett, Failla and Sarama3) which simulated human gastric and intestinal digestion. Micelle fractions were isolated from digested samples by ultracentrifugation. Both undigested and digested samples were extracted twice using a solvent mixture of hexane, acetone and ethanol (2:1:1); and the carotenoid content of the samples was quantified by HPLC, as previously described(Reference O'Sullivan, Ryan and Aherne2). Bioaccessibility (%) is defined as the proportion of carotenoids present in the micelle fractions compared with that contained in the original food.

Values are means for four independent experiments.

r,g,y Means with unlike superscript letters denote a significant difference between the peppers; one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test; P<0.05.

Of the red, green and yellow peppers, the red variety contained greater amounts of β-carotene (P<0.05) and zeaxanthin. The yellow peppers had the lowest carotenoid content. The green colour of green peppers is principally due to the presence of chlorophyll and to carotenoids typical of the chloroplast such as lutein. Likewise, in the present study, the green bell variety had more lutein than the yellow (P<0.05) and red bell peppers. The bioaccessibility of β-carotene was significantly greater (P<0.05) from both green and yellow peppers compared to their red counterparts. Lutein was more bioaccessible from yellow than red and green (P<0.05) peppers. Our findings show that red, green and yellow sweet peppers have different carotenoid profiles. Furthermore, carotenoid bioaccessibility varied within and between the three pepper varieties. These data suggest that the location of each carotenoid within the food matrix and/or carotenoid–carotenoid interactions may influence the bioaccessibility of carotenoids.

This work was supported by Science Foundation Ireland (PI Award 04/IN3/B509).

References

1.Maiani, G, Periago Caston, MJ, Catasta, G et al. (2009) Mol Nutr Food Res. 53, S194S218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.O'Sullivan, L, Ryan, L, Aherne, SA et al. (2008) Nutr Res 28, 532538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Garrett, DA, Failla, ML & Sarama, RJ (1999) J Agric Food Chem 47, 43014309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

r,g,y