Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T18:19:39.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Staff Procedure Skills in Management Groups during Exercises in Disaster Medicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Anders Rüter*
Affiliation:
Centre for Teaching and Research inDisaster Medicine, Linköping, Sweden
Per Örtenwall
Affiliation:
Centre for Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, Gothenburg, Sweden
*
Anders Rüter Centre for Teaching and Research in Disaster MedicineUniversity HospitalS-581 85 Linköping, Sweden E-mail: anders.ruter@lio.se

Abstract

Introduction:

In stressful situations such as the management of major incidents and disasters, the ability to work in a structured way is important. Medical management groups initially are formed by personnel from different operations that are on-call when the incident or disaster occurs.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to test if performance indicators for staff procedure skills in medical management groups during simulations could be used as a quality control tool for finding areas that require improvement.

Methods:

A total of 44 management groups were evaluated using performance indicators in which results could be expressed numerically during simulations.

Results:

The lowest scores were given to documentation and to the introduction of new staff members. The highest score was given the utilization of technical equipment.

Conclusions:

Staff procedure skills can be measured during simulations exercises. A logging system may lead to enhancing areas requiring improvement.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2. Swedish Defence Research Agency. Available at http:// www.foi.se/FOI/tempaltes/page_404.aspx. Accessed 04 September 2006.Google Scholar
3. Swedish National Defence College. Available at http://www.fhs.mil.se/utbkatalog. Accessed 04 September 2006.Google Scholar
4.Sundnes, KO, Birnbaum, ML (eds): Health disaster management: Guidelines for evaluation and research in the Utstein style. Prehospital Disast Med 2002;17(Suppl 3).Google Scholar
5.Rüter, A, Ö–rtenwall, P, Vikström, T: Performance indicators for prehospital command and control in training of medical first responders. International Journalof Disaster Medicine 2004;2:8992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Rüter, A, Ö–rtenwall, P, Vikström, T: Performance indicatorsfor major incident medical management–A possible tool for quality control?. International Journal of Disaster Medicine 2004;2:14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Rüter, A, Nilsson, H, Vikström, T: Performance indicators as quality control for testing and evaluating hospital management groups: A pilot study. Prehospital Disast Med 2006;21(6):423426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Emergo Train System. Available at http://www.emergotrain.com. Accessed 19 April 2006.Google Scholar
9. EMA Projects Program Report.Available at http://www.ema.gov.au. Accessed 19 April 2006.Google Scholar
10.Staedman, RH, Coates, WC, Huang, YM, et al. : Simulation-based training is superior to problem-based learning for the acquisition of critical assessment and management skills. Crit Care Med 2006;34:252253.Google Scholar
11.Rüter, A, Ö–rtenwall, P, Wikström, T: A new system for transmission of on-line information from scene of accident and ambulances to hospitals. International Journalof Disaster Medicine 2003;2:127131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Hogan, D, Burstein, J: Disaster Medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2002.Google Scholar
13.Birnbaum, M: Disaster research: Why, how, and when? Prehospital Disast Med 2000;15(2):88.(Editorial).CrossRefGoogle Scholar