Ahrens, F., Schön, J. & Schmitz, M. (1991). A discontinuous in vitro technique for measuring hind-gut fermentation in pigs. In Digestive Physiology in Pigs, pp. 226–230 [Verstegen, M. W. A., Huisman, J. and den Hartzog, L. A., editors]. Wageningen: Puduc.Google Scholar

Araba, M. & Dale, N. M. (1990). Evaluation of protein solubility as an indicator of overprocessing soybean meal. Poultry Science 69, 76–83.Google Scholar

Asp, N.-G., Johansson, C.-G., Hallmer, H. & Siljeström, M. (1983). Rapid enzymatic assay of insoluble and soluble dietary fiber. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 31, 476–482.Google Scholar

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1984). Official Methods of Analysis, 14th ed. Washington, DC: AOAC.Google Scholar

Assoumani, M. B., Nguyen, N. P., Lardinois, P. F., van Bree, J., Baudichau, A. & Bruyer, D. C. (1990). Use of a lysine oxidase electrode for lysine determination in Maillard model reactions and in soybean meal hydrolysates. Zeitschrift für Lebensmittelwissenschaft und - Technologie 23, 322–327.Google Scholar

Aufrere, J. & Michalet-Doreau, B. (1988). Comparison of methods for predicting digestibility of feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 20, 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babinszky, L., van der Meer, J. M., Boer, H. & den Hartog, L. A. (1990). An in-vitro method for prediction of the digestible crude protein content in pig feeds. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 50, 173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhatty, R. S. (1982). In vitro hydrolysis of skim milk and pea proteins by pepsin and rennin. Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology Journal 15, 101–108.Google Scholar

Björck, I., Nyman, M., Pedersen, B., Siljeström, M., Asp, N.-G. & Eggum, B. O. (1986). On the digestibility of starch in wheat bread. Studies in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Cereal Science 4, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boisen, S. (1991). A model for feed evaluation based on in vitro digestible dry matter and protein. In Digestion in vitro [Fuller, M. F., editor]. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux International. (In the Press.)Google Scholar

Boisen, S., Agergaard, N., Rotenberg, S. & Kragelund, Z. (1985). Effects of gut flora on intestinal activities of trypsin, chymotrypsin, elastase and amylase in growing rats fed diets with cellulose, pectin or sand. Zeitschrif für Tierphysiologie, Tierernährung und Futtermittelkunde 53, 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boisen, S. & Fernández, J. A. (1991 a). In vitro digestibility of energy and amino acids in pig feeds. In Digestive Physiology in Pigs, pp. 231–236 [Verstegen, M. W. A., Huisman, J. and den Hartzog, L. A., editors]. Wageningen: Puduc.Google Scholar

Boisen, S. & Fernández, J. A. (1991 a). In vitro digestion as a basis for the prediction of energy and protein value in pig feeds. 42nd Annual Meeting of European Association of Animal Production, Berlin, Report (8 pp) presented at meeting September 1991.Google Scholar

Brulé, D. & Savoie, L. (1988). In vitro digestibility of protein and amino acids in protein mixtures. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 43, 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, R. A. (1969). In vivo and in vitro methods of measuring nutritive value of leaf-protein preparations. British Journal of Nutrition 23, 533–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Büchmann, N. B. (1979). In vitro digestibility of protein from barley and other cereals. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 30, 583–589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carpenter, K. J. (1960). The estimation of the available lysine in animal-protein foods. Biochemical Journal 77, 604–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cave, N. A. (1988). Bioavailability of amino acids in plant feedstuffs determined by in vitro digestion, chick growth assay, and true amino acid availability methods. Poultry Science 67, 78–87.Google Scholar

Clunies, M. & Leeson, S. (1984). In vitro estimation of dry matter and crude protein digestibility. Poultry Science 63, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corring, T. (1980). The adaptation of digestive enzymes to the diet: its physiological significance. Reproduction, Nutrition, Développement 20, 1217–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corring, T., Juste, C. & Lhoste, E. F. (1989). Nutritional regulation of pancreatic and biliary secretions. Nutrition Research Reviews 2, 161–180.Google Scholar

Dierick, N., Vervaeke, I., Decuypere, J. & Hendrickx, H. (1985). Protein digestion in pigs measured in vivo and in vitro. In Digestive Physiology in the Pig, pp. 329–332 [Just, A., Jørgensen, H. and Fernández, J. A., editors]. Copenhagen: National Institute of Animal Science.Google Scholar

Drake, A. (1991). Simultaneous in vitro prediction of precaecal protein and carbohydrate digestion by pigs. In Digestion in vitro [Fuller, M. F., editor]. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux International. (In the Press.)Google Scholar

Eggum, B. O. (1973). A study of certain factors influencing protein utilization in rats and pigs. Report of National Institute of Animal Science, Copenhagen, no. 406. Copenhagen: National Institute of Animal Science.Google Scholar

Eggum, B. O. (1991). The influence of dietary fibre on protein digestion and utilization. In Dietary Fibre – A Component of Food – Nutritional Function in Health and Disease. (In the Press.)Google Scholar

Eggum, B. O., Andersen, J. O. & Rotenberg, S. (1982). The effect of dietary fibre level and microbial activity in the digestive tract on fat metabolism in rats and pigs. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica 32, 145–150.Google Scholar

Eggum, B. O. & Boisen, S. (1991). In vitro techniques of measuring digestion. In Digestive Physiology in Pigs, pp. 213–225 [Verstegen, M. W. A., Huisman, J. and den Hartzog, L. A., editors]. Wageningen: Puduc.Google Scholar

Eggum, B. O., Hansen, I. & Larsen, T. (1989). Protein quality and digestible energy of selected foods determined in balance trials with rats. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 39, 13–21.Google Scholar

Ehle, F. R., Jeraci, J. L., Robertson, J. B. & Van Soest, P. J. (1982). The influence of dietary fiber on digestibility, rate of passage and gastrointestinal fermentation in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 55, 1071–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elbers, A. R. W., Den Hartog, L. A., Verstegen, M. W. A. & Zandstra, T. (1989). Between- and within-herd variation in the digestibility of feed for growing-finishing pigs. Livestock Production Science 23, 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fonty, G. & Gouet, P. (1989). Fibre-degrading microorganisms in the monogastric digestive tract. Animal Feed Science and Technology 23, 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, H. I. & Nylund, B. (1980). Intestinal fat digestion, absorption, and transport. A review. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 33, 1108–1139.Google Scholar

Furuya, S., Sakamoto, K. & Takahashi, S. (1979). A new in vitro method for the estimation of digestibility using the intestinal fluid of the pig. British Journal of Nutrition 41, 511–520.Google Scholar

Galibois, I., Savoie, L., Simoes Nunes, C. & Rérat, A. (1989). Relation between in vitro and in vivo assessment of aminoacid availability. Reproduction, Nutrition, Développement 29, 495–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gauthier, S. F., Vachon, C., Jones, J. D. & Savoie, L. (1982). Assessment of Protein digestibility by in vitro enzymatic hydrolysis with simultaneous dialysis. Journal of Nutrition 112, 1718–1725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gauthier, S. F., Vachon, C. & Savoie, L. (1986). Enzymatic conditions of an in vitro method to study protein digestion. Journal of Food Science 51, 960–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goering, H. K. & Van Soest, P. J. (1970). Forage Fiber Analyses (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures and Some Applications). Agriculture Handbook, no. 379. Washington, DC: Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar

Graham, H., Löwgren, W. & Åman, P. (1989). An in vitro method for studying digestion in the pig. 2. Comparison with in vivo ileal and faecal digestibilities. British Journal of Nutrition 61, 689–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimble, G. K. & Silk, D. B. A. (1989). Peptides in human nutrition. Nutrition Research Reviews 2, 87–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gurr, M. I., Borlak, N. & Ganatra, S. (1989). Dietary fat and plasma lipids. Nutrition Research Reviews 2, 63–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harrison, M. D., Ballard, M. R. M., Barclay, R. A., Jackson, M. E. & Stilborn, H. L. (1991). A comparison of true digestibility for poultry and apparent ileal digestibility for swine. A classical in vitro method and NIR spectrophotometry for determining amino acid digestibility. In Digestive Physiology in Pigs, pp. 254–259 [Verstegen, M. W. A., Huisman, J. and den Hartzog, L. A., editors]. Wageningen: Puduc.Google Scholar

Holm, J., Lundquist, I., Björck, I., Eliasson, A.-C. & Asp, N.-G. (1988). Degree of starch gelatinization, digestion rate of starch in vitro, and metabolic response in rats. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 47, 1010–1016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holzgraefe, D. P., Fahey, G. C. & Jensen, A. H. (1985). Influence of dietary alfalfa: orchardgrass hay and lasalocid on in vitro estimates of dry matter digestibility and volatile fatty acid concentrations of cecal contents and rate of digesta passage in sows. Journal of Animal Science 60, 1235–1246.Google Scholar

Howard, P. & Mahoney, R. R. (1989). Effect of dietary fibres on the enzymatic digestion of casein. Food Chemistry 34, 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hsu, H. W., Vavak, D. L., Satterlee, L. D. & Miller, G. A. (1977). A multienzyme technique for estimating protein digestibility. Journal of Food Science 42, 1269–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ikeda, K. & Kusano, T. (1983). In vitro inhibition of digestive enzymes by indigestible polysaccharides. Cereal Chemistry 60, 260–263.Google Scholar

Just, A., Jørgensen, H. & Fernández, J. A. (1985). Correlations of protein deposited in growing female pigs to ileal and faecal digestible crude protein and amino acids. Livestock Production Science 12, 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lathia, D., Hoch, G. & Kievernagel, Y. (1987). Influence of phytate on in vitro digestibility of casein under physiological conditions. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 37, 229–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Le François, P. (1989). In-vitro availability of starch in cereal products. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 49, 499–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liener, I. E. & Kakade, M. L. (1980). Protease inhibitors. In Toxic Constituents of Plant Foodstuffs, 2nd ed., pp. 7–71 [Liener, I. E., editor]. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Low, A. G. (1980). Nutrient absorption in pigs. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 1087–1130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Low, A. G. (1990). Protein evaluation in pigs and poultry. In Feedstuff Evaluation, pp. 91–114 [Wiseman, J. and Cole, D. J. A., editors]. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Löwgren, W., Graham, H. & Åman, P. (1989). An in vitro method for studying digestion in the pig. 1. Simulating digestion in the different compartments of the intestine. British Journal of Nutrition 61, 673–687.Google Scholar

McDonough, F. E., Sarwar, G., Steinke, F. H., Slump, P., Garcia, S. & Boisen, S. (1990). In vitro assay for protein digestibility: interlaboratory study. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 73, 622–625.Google ScholarPubMed

Maga, J. A., Lorenz, K. & Onayemi, O. (1973). Digestive acceptability of proteins as measured by the initial rate of in vitro proteolysis. Journal of Food Science 38, 173–174.Google Scholar

Mason, V. C. (1984). Metabolism of nitrogenous compounds in the large gut. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 43, 45–53.Google Scholar

Mauron, J., Mottu, F., Bujard, E. & Egli, R. H. (1955). The availability of lysine, methionine and tryptophan in condensed milk and milk powder. In vitro digestion studies. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 59, 433–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mehansho, H., Butler, L. G. & Carlson, D. M. (1987). Dietary tannins and salivary proline-rich proteins: interactions, induction, and defense mechanisms. Annual Review of Nutrition 7, 423–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Metz, S. H. M. & Van der Meer, J. M. (1985). Nylon bag and in vitro techniques to predict in vivo digestibility of organic matter in feedstuffs for pigs. In Digestive Physiology in the Pig, pp. 373–376 [Just, A., Jørgensen, H. and Fernández, J. A., editors]. Copenhagen: National Institute of Animal Science.Google Scholar

Morón, D., Melito, C. & Tovar, J. (1989). Effect of indigestible residue from foodstuffs on trypsin and pancreatic α-amylase activity in vitro. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 47, 171–179.Google Scholar

Moughan, P. J., Schrama, J., Skilton, G. A. & Smith, W. C. (1989). In-vitro determination of nitrogen digestibility and lysine availability in meat and bone meals and comparison with in-vivo ileal digestibility estimates. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 47, 281–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Dea, K., Snow, P. & Nestel, P. (1981). Rate of starch hydrolysis in vitro as a predictor of metabolic responses to complex carbohydrate in vivo. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 34, 1991–1993.Google Scholar

Öste, R., Sjödin, P., Jägerstad, M., Björck, I. & Dahlqvist, A. (1985). Effect of Maillard reaction products on carbohydrate utilization – studies in vitro and in vivo. Food Chemistry 16, 37–47.Google Scholar

Parsons, C. M. (1991). Use of pepsin digestibility, multienzyme pH change and protein solubility assays to predict in vivo protein quality of feedstuffs. In Digestion in vitro [Fuller, M. F., editor]. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux International. (In the Press.)Google Scholar

Pedersen, B. & Eggum, B. O. (1981). Prediction of protein digestibility by in vitro procedures based on two multienzyme systems. Zeitschrift für Tierphysiologie, Tierernährung und Futtermittelkunde 45, 190–200.Google Scholar

Pedersen, B. & Eggum, B. O. (1983). Prediction of protein digestibility by an in vitro enzymatic pH-stat procedure. Zeitschrift für Tierphysiologie, Tierernährung und Futtermittelkunde 49, 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pusztai, A. (1989). Biological effects of dietary lectins. In Recent Advances of Research in Antinutritional Factors in Legume Seeds, pp. 17–29 [Huisman, J., van der Poel, T. F. B. and Liener, I. E., editors]. Wageningen: Puduc.Google Scholar

Robbins, R. C. (1978). Effect of ratio of enzymes to substrate on amino acid patterns released from proteins in vitro. International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research 48, 44–53.Google ScholarPubMed

Roehrig, K. L. (1984). Carbohydrate Biochemistry and Nutrition. Westport, CT.: AVI Publishing Co. Inc.Google Scholar

Sakamoto, K., Asano, T., Furuya, S. & Takahashi, S. (1980). Estimation of in vivo digestibility with the laying hen by an in vitro method using the intestinal fluid of the pig. British Journal of Nutrition 43, 389–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarwar, G., Savoie, L., Peace, R. W. & Parent, G. (1989). A comparison of in vitro enzymatic and rat balance methods for measuring digestibility of protein and amino acids in foods. In Absorption and Utilization of Amino Acids, vol. 3, pp. 231–242 [Friedman, M., editor]. Baton Rouge, LA: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Satterlee, L. D., Kendrick, J. G., Jewell, D. K. & Brown, W. D. (1981). Estimating apparent protein digestibility from in vitro assays. In Protein Quality for Humans: Assessment and in vitro Estimation, pp. 316–339 [Bodwell, C. E., Adkins, J. S. and Hopkins, D. T., editors]. Westport, CT.: AVI Publishing Co. Inc.Google Scholar

Sauer, W. C., den Hartog, L. A., Huisman, J., van Leeuwen, P. & de Lange, C. F. M. (1989). The evaluation of the mobile nylon bag technique for determining the apparent protein digestibility in a wide variety of feedstuffs for pigs. Journal of Animal Science 67, 432–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sauer, W. C., Jørgensen, H. & Berzins, R. (1983). A modified nylon bag technique for determining apparent digestibilities of protein in feedstuffs for pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 63, 233–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sauer, W. C. & Ozimek, L. (1986). Digestibility of amino acids in swine: results and their practical applications. A review. Livestock Production Science 15, 367–388.Google Scholar

Saunders, R. M., Connor, M. A., Booth, A. N., Bickoff, E. M. & Kohler, G. O. (1973). Measurement of digestibility of alfalfa prote in concentrates by in vivo and in vitro methods. Journal of Nutrition 103, 530–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Savoie, L. & Charbonneau, R. (1990). Specific role of endopeptidases in modulating the nature of protein digestion products. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 40, 233–242.Google Scholar

Savoie, L., Charbonneau, R. & Parent, G. (1989). In vitro amino acid digestibility of food proteins as measured by the digestion cell technique. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 39, 93–107.Google Scholar

Savoie, L. & Gauthier, S. F. (1986). Dialysis cell for the in vitro measurement of protein digestibility. Journal of Food Science 51, 494–498.Google Scholar

Schneeman, B. O. (1978). Effect of plant fiber on lipase, trypsin and chymotrypsin activity. Journal of Food Science 43, 634–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneeman, B. O. (1982). Pancreatic and digestive function. In Dietary Fiber in Health and Disease, pp. 73–83 [Vahouny, G. V. and Kritchevsky, D., editors]. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sheffner, A. L., Eckfeldt, G. A. & Spector, H. (1956). The pepsin-digest-residue (PDR) amino acid index of net protein utilization. Journal of Nutrition 60, 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siljeström, M., Björk, I., Eliasson, A.-C., Lönner, C., Nyman, M. & Asp, N.-G. (1988). Effects of polysaccharides during baking and storage of bread. In vitro and in vivo studies. Cereal Chemistry 65, 1–8.Google Scholar

Steinhart, H. & Kirchgessner, M. (1973). [In vitro digestion apparatus for the enzymic hydrolysis of proteins.] Archiv für Tierernährung 23, 449–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tanksley, T. D. & Knabe, D. A. (1984). Ileal digestibilities of amino acids in pig feeds and their use in formulating diets. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition 1984, pp. 75–95 [Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A., editors]. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar

Taverner, M. R. & Farrell, D. J. (1981). Availability to pigs of amino acids in cereal grains. 3. A comparison of ileal availability values with faecal, chemical and enzymic estimates. British Journal of Nutrition 46, 173–180.Google Scholar

Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 104–111.Google Scholar

Tuffnell, J. M. & Payne, J. W. (1985). A colorimetric enzyme assay using Escherichia coli to determine nutritionally available lysine in biological materials. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 58, 333–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vachon, C., Gauthier, S., Jones, J. D. & Savoie, L. (1983). In vitro enzymatic release of amino acids from alkalitreated proteins containing lysinoalanine. Nutrition Reports International 27, 1303–1313.Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, P., Verstegen, M. W. A., van Lonkhuijsen, H. J. & van Kempen, G. J. M. (1991). Near infrared reflectance (NIR) spectroscopy to estimate the apparent ileal digestibility of protein in feedstuffs. In Digestive Physiology in Pigs, pp. 260–265 [Verstegen, M. W. A., Huisman, J. and den Hartzog, L. A., editors]. Wageningen: Pudoc.Google Scholar

Van der Meer, J. M. & Perez, J. M. (1990). In vitro evaluation of European diets for pigs. Prediction of the organic matter digestibility by an enzymatic method or by chemical evaluation. 41st Annual Meeting of European Association of Animal Production, Toulouse, Report (16 pp) presented at meeting July 1990.Google Scholar

Van der Poel, A. F. B. (1990). Effect of processing on bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Protein quality. Thesis, Agricultural University of Wageningen.Google Scholar

Vervaeke, I. J., Decuypere, J. A., Dierick, N. A. & Henderickx, H. K. (1979). Quantitative in vitro evaluation of the energy metabolism influenced by virginiamycin and spiramycin used as growth promotors in pig nutrition. Journal of Animal Science 49, 846–856.Google Scholar

Vervaeke, I. J., Dierick, N. A., Demeyer, D. I. & Decuypere, J. A. (1989). Approach to the energetic importance of fibre digestion in pigs. II. An experimental approach to hindgut digestion. Animal Feed Science and Technology 23, 169–194.Google Scholar

White, J. S., Parsons, C. M. & Baker, D. H. (1988). An in vitro digestibility assay for prediction of the metabolizable energy of low-calorie dextrose polymeric bulking agents. Journal of Food Science 53, 1204–1207.Google Scholar

Wolza, A., Bressani, R. & Brenes, Gómez R. (1981). A comparison of in vivo and in vitro estimates of protein digestibility of native and thermally processed vegetable proteins. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 31 31–43.Google Scholar