Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-26T12:48:09.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Point prevalence of bovine fascioliasis and the influence of chemotherapy on the milk yield in a lactating bovine population from the district of Toba Tek Singh, Pakistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2010

M.K. Khan*
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology , University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan
M.S. Sajid
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology , University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan
M.N. Khan
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology , University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Z. Iqbal
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology , University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan
M. Arshad
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan
A. Hussain
Affiliation:
Veterinary Officer (Health), District Sheikhupura, Livestock and Dairy Development Department, Punjab, Pakistan

Abstract

This paper provides an estimation of the point prevalence of fascioliasis and its economic impact in terms of increased milk yield after chemotherapy of a bovine population from the district of Toba Tek Singh, Punjab, Pakistan. A total of 2400 cattle and buffaloes were examined quantitatively using the McMaster egg-counting technique. Infected cattle and buffaloes (50 of each) were randomly selected and each divided into two groups of 25 animals. Groups A (buffaloes) and C (cattle) were treated with oxyclozanide (orally, 16.6 mg kg− 1 body weight). Groups B and D served as negative controls for buffaloes and cattle, respectively. Pre- and post-treatment milk yield was recorded to determine if there were any changes in milk yield after treatment. Of 2400 faecal samples analysed, 654 (27.25%) were positive for Fasciola spp. with a mean number of eggs per gram (EPG) of 503.2. The point prevalence and worm burden of fascioliasis was significantly higher (OR = 2.13; P < 0.05) in buffaloes (34.58%; 415/1200; mean EPG maximum likelihood = 521.4) as compared to that of cattle (19.92%; 239/1200; mean EPG maximum likelihood = 415.8). Among the parasite species, F. gigantica (19.88%; 477/2400) was predominant (OR = 3.12; P < 0.05) as compared to F. hepatica (7.38%; 177/2400). An average daily increase of 0.67 and 0.87 litres of milk, with 0.41% and 0.37% more fat per animal, was observed in oxyclozanide-treated buffaloes and cattle, respectively. The economic value of reduced production of infected animals was estimated as US$0.33 and 0.32 per animal per day for cattle and buffaloes, respectively.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, S.J. (1999) The life cycle of Fasciola hepatica. pp. 129in Dalton, J.P. (Ed.) Fasciolosis. Wallingford, CAB International.Google Scholar
Banerjee, G.C. (1991) A text book of animal husbandry. 7th edn. pp. 102104. New Delhi, Oxford & IBH publishing.Google Scholar
Berhe, G., Berhane, K. & Tadesse, G. (2009) Prevalence and economic significance of fasciolosis in cattle in Mekelle Area of Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production 41, 15031504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boray, J.C. (1985) Flukes of domestic animals. pp. 179218in Gaafar, S.M., Howard, W.E. & Marsh, R.E. (Eds) Parasite, pests and predators. New York, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Boray, J.C. (1990) Drug resistance in Fasciola hepatica. pp. 5160in Boray, J.C., Martin, P.J. & Roush, R.T. (Eds) Resistance of parasites to antiparasitic drugs. Rahway, New Jersey, MSD AGVET.Google Scholar
Castagnetti, G.B., Losi, G., Morini, D. & Padovani, I. (1982) Influenza della distomatosi sulla produzione quali-quantitativa del latte con particolare riferimento alla composizione della frazione lipidica. Scienza e Tecnica Lattiero-Casearia 33, 311334.Google Scholar
Chaudhry, A.H. & Niaz, M. (1984) Liver fluke – a constant threat to livestock development. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 4, 4243.Google Scholar
Coles, G.C., Bauer, C., Borgsteede, F.H., Geerts, S., Klei, T.R., Taylor, M.A. & Waller, P.J. (1992) World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP): methods for the detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance. Veterinary Parasitology 44, 3544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dargie, J.M. (1987) Trematode infections in sheep and cattle: effects on productivity and metabolism. pp. 3543in Leaning, W.H.D. & Guerrero, J. (Eds) The economic impact of parasitism in cattle. Proceedings of the MSD AGVET Symposium, XXIII World Veterinary Congress, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar
Dawes, B. & Hughes, D.L. (1970) Fascioliasis: the invasive stages in mammals. Advances in Parasitology 8, 259274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fairweather, I. & Boray, J.C. (1999) Mechanisms of fasciolicide action and drug resistance in Fasciola hepatica. pp. 225276in Dalton, J.P. (Ed.) Fasciolosis. Wallingford, CAB International.Google Scholar
FAO (1994) Diseases of domestic animals caused by flukes. 49 pp. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Hawkins, C.D. & Morris, R.S. (1978) Depression of productivity in sheep infected with Fasciola hepatica. Veterinary Parasitology 4, 341351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, C.M.J. (1984) Review of the economic importance of fasciolosis in sheep and cattle. Irish Veterinary News September, 1422.Google Scholar
Iqbal, Z., Sajid, M.S., Jabbar, A, Abbas, R.Z. & Khan, M.N. (2006) Techniques in parasitology. pp. 3540. Islamabad, Higher Education Commission of Pakistan.Google Scholar
Jabbar, A., Iqbal, Z., Kerboeuf, D., Muhammad, G., Khan, M.N. & Affaq, M. (2006) Anthelmintic resistance: the state of play revisited. Life Sciences 79, 24132431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendall, S.B. (1953) The life-history of Limnaea truncatula under laboratory conditions. Journal of Helminthology 27, 1728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, M.K., Sajid, M.S., Khan, M.N., Iqbal, Z. & Iqbal, M.U. (2009) Bovine fasciolosis: Prevalence, effects of treatment on productivity and cost benefit analysis in five districts of Punjab, Pakistan. Research in Veterinary Science 87, 7075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, P. & Pachauri, S.P. (1989) Efficacy of albendazole against Fasciola gigantica infection in buffaloes with particular reference to milk production. Veterinary Parasitology 3, 3539.Google Scholar
Maqbool, A., Hayat, C.S., Akhtar, T. & Hashmi, H.A. (2002) Epidemiology of fasciolosis in buffaloes under different managemental conditions. Veterinarski Arhiv 72, 221228.Google Scholar
Masud, F.S. & Majid, A. (1984) Incidence of fascioliasis in buffaloes and cattle of Multan division. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 4, 3334.Google Scholar
Mungube, E.O., Bauni, S.M., Tenhagen, B.A., Wamae, L.W., Nginyi, J.M. & Mugambi, J.M. (2006) The prevalence and economic significance of Fasciola gigantica and Stilesia hepatica in slaughtered animals in the semi-arid coastal Kenya. Tropical Animal Health and Production 38, 475483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oakley, G.A., Owen, B. & Knapp, N.H. (1979) Production effects of subclinical liver fluke infection in growing dairy heifers. Veterinary Record 104, 503507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Population Census Organization (2008) District census reports. Statistics division, Ministry of Economic Affairs & Statistics, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, 612, Pakistan.Google Scholar
Randell, W.F. & Bradley, R.E. (1980) Effect of hexachlorethane on the milk yields of dairy cows in north Florida infected with Fasciola gigantica. American Journal of Veterinary Research 41, 262263.Google Scholar
Rapsch, C., Schweizer, G., Grimm, F., Kohler, L., Bauer, C., Deplazes, P., Braun, U. & Torgerson, P.R. (2006) Estimating the true prevalence of Fasciola hepatica in cattle slaughtered in Switzerland in the absence of an absolute diagnostic test. International Journal of Parasitology 36, 11531158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rondelaud, D., Vignoles, P., Abrous, M. & Dreyfuss, G. (2001) The definitive and intermediate hosts of Fasciola hepatica in the natural watercress beds in central France. Parasitology Research 87, 475478.Google ScholarPubMed
Ross, J.G. (1970) The economics of Fasciola hepatica infections in cattle. British Veterinary Journal 126, 1315.Google ScholarPubMed
Sahar, R. (1996) A study on the epidemiological aspects of fascioliasis in buffaloes in Lahore district. MSc Thesis, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lahore.Google Scholar
Sampaio-Silva, M.L., Da Costa, J.M., Da Costa, A.M., Pires, M.A., Lopes, S.A., Castro, A.M. & Monjour, L. (1996) Antigenic compounds of excretory-secretory products of adult F. hepatica recognized in human infections. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 54, 146148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS (1998) SAS/STAT users' guides, version 6.12. Cary, North Carolina, SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Schweizer, G., Braun, U., Deplazes, P. & Torgerson, P.R. (2005) Estimating the financial losses due to bovine fasciolosis in Switzerland. Veterinary Record 157, 188193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soulsby, E.J. (1987) Parasitologia y enfermedades parasitarias. 7th edn. pp. 235236. 40–44Mexico D.F, Mexico, Intermericana.Google Scholar
Spithill, T.W., Smooker, P.M. & Copeman, D.B. (1999) Fasciola gigantica: epidemiology, control, immunology and molecular biology. pp. 465525in Dalton, J.P. (Ed.) Fasciolosis. Wallingford, CAB International.Google Scholar
Thrusfield, M. (2008) Veterinary epidemiology. pp. 180181, 224, 225. Oxford, Blackwell Science Limited.Google Scholar
Torgerson, P.R., Schnyder, M. & Hertzberg, H. (2005) Detection of anthelmintic resistance: a comparison of mathematical techniques. Veterinary Parasitology 128, 291298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehead, J.D. (1976) Observations on the repeated treatment for Fasciola of stock on a farm in South West England. Veterinary Record 98, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, I.B., Amaral, N.K., Bairden, K., Duncan, J.L., Kassai, T., Malone, J.B. Jr, Pankavic, J.A., Reinecke, R.K., Slocombe, O., Taylor, S.M. & Vercruysse, J. (1995) World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) second edition of guidelines for evaluating the efficacy of anthelmintics in ruminants (bovine, ovine, caprine). Veterinary Parasitology 58, 181213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed