Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T12:28:52.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exchange Rate Proclamations and Inflation-Fighting Credibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2010

Alexandra Guisinger  and
David Andrew Singer
Alexandra Guisinger
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Ind. E-mail: aguising@nd.edu
David Andrew Singer
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. E-mail: dasinger@mit.edu.
Get access

Abstract

If governments choose economic policies that often run counter to their public commitments, are those commitments meaningless? We argue that government proclamations can be critical in signaling economic policy intentions. We focus on the realm of exchange rate policy, in which countries frequently implement an exchange rate regime that differs from the officially declared regime. We argue that the official exchange rate regime is one of the most important signals of a government's economic policy preferences. When a government makes a de jure public commitment to a fixed exchange rate, it sends a signal to domestic and international markets of its strict monetary-policy priorities. In contrast, a government that proclaims a floating exchange rate signals a desire to retain discretion over monetary policy, even if it has implemented a de facto fixed rate. We use data on 110 developed and developing countries from 1974 to 2004 to test two hypotheses: first, that governments that adopt de facto fixed exchange rates will experience less inflation when they back up their actions with official declarations; and second, that governments that abide by their commitments—as demonstrated by a history of following through on their public declarations of a fixed exchange rate regime—will establish greater inflation-fighting credibility. Within developing countries, democratic institutions enhance this credibility. Results from fixed-effects econometric models provide strong support for our hypotheses.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 64 , Issue 2 , April 2010 , pp. 313 - 337
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alesina, Alberto, and Wagner, Alexander F.. 2006. Choosing (and Reneging on) Exchange Rate Regimes. Journal of the European Economic Association 4 (4):770–99.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Mike, Cheibub, José Antonio, Limongi, Fernando, and Przeworski, Adam. 1996. Classifying Political Regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development 31 (2):3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arellano, Manuel. 1993. On the Testing of Correlated Effects with Panel Data. Journal of Econometrics 59 (1–2):87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baerg, Nicole. 2007. Mind the Gap: De Jure and De Facto Exchange Rate Regimes. Paper presented at the Conference of the International Political Economy Society, Stanford University, November, Palo Alto, Calif.Google Scholar
Bearce, David, and Hallerberg, Mark. 2006. Democracy and De Facto Exchange Rate Regimes. Paper presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, March, San Diego, Calif.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 2004. Time-Series Cross-Section Issues: Dynamics, 2004. New York University Working Paper, New York.Google Scholar
Bernanke, Ben S. 2003. Downside Danger. Foreign Policy 139 (November–December):74–75.Google Scholar
Bernhard, William, Broz, J. Lawrence, and Clark, William Roberts. 2002. The Political Economy of Monetary Institutions. International Organization 56 (4):693–723.Google Scholar
Broz, J. Lawrence. 2002. Political System Transparency and Monetary Commitment Regimes. International Organization 56 (4):861–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, Guillermo A., and Reinhart, Carmen M.. 2002. Fear of Floating. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (2):379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canavan, Chris, and Tommasi, Mariano. 1997. On the Credibility of Alternative Exchange Rate Regimes. Journal of Development Economics 54 (1):101–22.Google Scholar
Chinn, Menzie, and Ito, Hiro. 2006. What Matters for Financial Development? Capita Controls, Institutions, and Interactions. Journal of Development Economics 81 (1):163–92.Google Scholar
Cohen, Benjamin J. 1993. The Triad and the Unholy Trinity: Lessons for the Pacific Region. In Pacific Economic Relations in the 1990s: Cooperation or Conflict?, edited by Higgott, Richard, Leaver, Richard, and Ravenhill, John, 133–58. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Cukierman, Alex, and Lippi, Francesco. 1999. Central Bank Independence, Centralization of Wage Bargaining, Inflation and Unemployment: Theory and Some Evidence. European Economic Review 43 (7):1395–434.Google Scholar
Cukierman, Alex, Miller, Geoffrey P., and Neyapti, Bilin. 2002. Central Bank Reform, Liberalization and Inflation in Transition Economies: An International Perspective. Journal of Monetary Economics 49 (2):237–64.Google Scholar
Cukierman, Alex, Webb, Steven B., and Neyapti, Bilin. 1992. Measuring the Independence of Central Banks and Its Effect on Policy Outcomes. World Bank Economic Review 6 (3):353–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desai, Raj M., Olofsgard, Anders, and Yousef, Tarik M.. 2003. Democracy, Inequality, and Inflation. American Political Science Review 97 (3):391–406.Google Scholar
Dornbusch, Rudiger, Sturzenegger, Federico, Wolf, Holger, Fischer, Stanley, and Barro, Robert J.. 1990. Extreme Inflation: Dynamics and Stabilization. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2:1–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry. 1999. Toward a New International Financial Architecture: A Practical Post-Asia Agenda. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry, and Razo-Garcia, Raul. 2006. The International Monetary System in the Last and Next Twenty Years. Economic Policy 21 (47):393–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatas, Antonio, Mihov, Ilian, and Rose, Andrew K.. 2007. Quantitative Goals for Monetary Policy. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 39 (5):1163–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James. 1994. Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes. American Political Science Review 88 (3):577–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry A. 1991. Invested Interests: The Politics of National Economic Policies in a World of Global Finance. International Organization 45 (4):425–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry A. 2002. Real Sources of European Currency Policy: Sectoral Interests and European Monetary Integration. International Organization 56 (4):831–60.Google Scholar
Genberg, Hans, and Swoboda, Alexander K.. 2005. Exchange Rate Regimes: Does What Countries Say Matter? IMF Staff Papers 52:129–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, Atish R., Gulde, Anne-Marie, and Wolf, Holger C.. 2003. Exchange Rate Regimes: Choices and Consequences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Giavazzi, Francesco, and Pagano, Marco. 1988. The Advantage of Tying One's Hands: EMS Discipline and Central Bank Credibility. European Economic Review 32 (5):1055–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausmann, Ricardo, Panizza, Ugo, and Stein, Ernesto H.. 2001. Why Do Countries Float the Way They Float? Journal of Development Economics 66 (2):387–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrendorf, Berthold. 1999. Transparency, Reputation, and Credibility Under Floating and Pegged Exchange Rates. Journal of International Economics 49 (1):31–50.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund. Annual Report on Exchange Rate Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions. Various years.Google Scholar
Keefer, Philip, and Stasavage, David. 2002. Checks and Balances, Private Information, and the Credibility of Monetary Commitments. International Organization 56 (4):751–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefer, Philip, and Stasavage, David. 2003. The Limits of Delegation: Veto Players, Central Bank Independence, and the Credibility of Monetary Policy. American Political Science Review 97 (3):407–23.Google Scholar
Klein, Michael W., and Shambaugh, Jay C.. 2007. The Dynamics of Exchange Rate Regimes: Fixes, Floats, and Flips. Journal of International Economics 75 (1):70–92.Google Scholar
Kool, Clemens J. M., and Lammertsma, Alex. 2005. Inflation Persistence Under Semi-Fixed Exchange Rate Regimes: The European Evidence, 1974–1998. Open Economies Review 16 (1):51–76.Google Scholar
Levy-Yeyati, Eduardo, and Sturzenegger, Federico. 2003. To Float or to Fix: Evidence on the Impact of Exchange Rate Regimes on Growth. American Economic Review 93 (4):1173–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Kathleen R., and Castro, Eduardo C.. 2003. The Diffusion of Central Bank Independence. Paper presented at the 99th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August, Philadelphia, Pa.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Bumba, and Leblang, David. 2006. Minority Governments and Exchange Rate Regimes: Examining Evidence from 21 OECD Countries, 1975–1999. European Union Politics 7 (4):450–76.Google Scholar
Obstfeld, Maurice, and Rogoff, Kenneth S.. 1995. The Mirage of Fixed Exchange Rates. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (4):73–96.Google Scholar
Plümper, Thomas, and Troeger, Vera E.. 2007. Efficient Estimation of Time-Invariant and Rarely Changing Variables in Finite Sample Panel Analyses with Unit Fixed Effects. Political Analysis 15 (2):124–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plümper, Thomas, and Troeger, Vera E.. 2008. Fear of Floating and the External Effects of Currency Unions. American Journal of Political Science 52 (3):656–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Political Instability Task Force. 2007. Internal Wars and Failures of Governance, 1955–2006. Principal Investigators: Monty G. Marshall, Ted Robert Gurr, and Barbara Harff. Available at ⟨http://globalpolicy.gmu.edu/pitf/⟩. Accessed 2 February 2010.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Carmen M., and Rogoff, Kenneth S.. 2004. The Modern History of Exchange Rate Arrangements: A Reinterpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (1):1–48.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Carmen M., and Végh, Carlos A.. 1999. Do Exchange Rate-Based Stabilizations Carry the Seeds of Their Own Destruction? Munich Personal RePEc Archive. MPRA Paper 8952. Available at ⟨http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/8952/⟩. Accessed 2 February 2010.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Mark E., and Stillman, Steven. 2006. XTOVERID: Stata Module to Calculate Tests of Overidentifying Restrictions after xtreg, xtivreg, xtivreg2 and xthtaylor. Available at ⟨http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s456779.html⟩. Accessed 2 February 2010.Google Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth. 2004. Public Inflation Aversion and the Political Economy of Macroeconomic Policymaking. International Organization 58 (1):1–34.Google Scholar
Shambaugh, George. 2004. The Power of Money: Global Capital and Policy Choices in Developing Countries. American Journal of Political Science 48 (2):281–95.Google Scholar
Shambaugh, Jay C. 2004. The Effect of Fixed Exchange Rates on Monetary Policy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (1):301–52.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., and Hainmueller, Jens. 2005. Can Domestic Institutions Explain Exchange Rate Regime Choice? The Political Economy of Monetary Institutions Reconsidered. Manuscript, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Stasavage, David. 2003. Transparency, Democratic Accountability, and the Economic Consequences of Monetary Institutions. American Journal of Political Science 47 (3):389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, Michael. 2007. Reputation and International Cooperation: Sovereign Debt Across Three Centuries. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
von Hagen, Jürgen, and Zhou, Jizhong. 2005. De Facto and Official Exchange Rate Regimes in Transition Economies. Economic Systems 29 (2):256–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2007. World Development Indicators. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar