Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T14:10:31.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jews and Muslims in Dante’s Vision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2008

Jesper Hede
Jesper Hede*
Affiliation:
Department of Comparative Literature, Aarhus University, Langelandsgade 139, Aarhus C, DK-8000, Denmark
*
Email: litjh@hum.au.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dante’s attitude towards Jews and Muslims in the Divine Comedy has been a controversial issue in literary studies of the medieval period. This article outlines the most central questions in this regard and argues that the treatment of the issue has often been misleading due to exaggeration and overstatement. Dante has been seen, respectively, as a summarizer of medieval culture and mentalities, as a medieval intellectual who was more open for non-Christian influences than his fellow Christians, and as a highly prejudiced conservative. In considering the constituents of Dante’s worldview, the article that follows argues that Dante should rather be seen as a medieval Christian whose cultural horizon was limited, whose political theory of world government was narrowly focused on a specific problem within European Christendom, and whose vision of redemption, although complex and original in various respects, could not but embrace all human beings as either righteous or corrupted Christians.

Type
Focus: al-Andalus – the Three Cultures
Information
European Review , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 101 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and References

1.Roth, C. (1953) New light on Dante’s Circle. Modern Language Review, 48, 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Cassuto, U. (1921) Dante e Manoello (Firenze: Isreale). See also F. Alfie (1998) Immanuel of Rome, alias Manoello Giudeo: the poetics of Jewish identity in fourteenth-century Italy. Italica, 75 (3), 308.Google Scholar
3.Moore, R. I. (1987) The Formation of a Persecuting Society: Power and Deviance in Western Europe, 950–1250 (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 147–150.Google Scholar
4. Citations are taken from Mark Musa’s English translation of the Divina Commedia. Dante (1995) The Portable Dante (New York: Penguin).Google Scholar
5.Dales, R. C. (1984) The origin of the doctrine of the double truth. Viator, 15, 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. M. Corti (1981) Dante a un crocevia (Firenze: Sansoni) and M. Corti (1983) La felicità mentale: Nuove perspettive per Cavalcanti e Dante. (Firenze: Einaudi).Google Scholar
7.Hede, J. (1998) Dante in the hermeneutic circle of European consciousness. European Studies Newsletter, 1(2), 4–19.Google Scholar
8.Southern, R. W. (1973) Dante and Islam. In Baker, D. (ed.) Relations between East and West in the Middle Ages (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), pp. 138–139.Google Scholar
9.Cantarino, V. (1965) Dante and Islam: history and analysis of a controversy. In De Sua, W. and Rizzo, G. (eds) A Dante Symposium in Commemoration of the 700th Anniversary of the Poet’s Birth (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press), pp. 175–198.Google Scholar
10.Palacios, M. A. (1919) La Escatologìa Musulmana en la Divina Commedia (Madrid: Estanislao Maestre).Google Scholar
11.Cerulli, E. (1949) Il Libro della Scala e la questione delle fonti arabo-spagnole della Divina Commedia (Città del Vaticano: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana).Google Scholar
12.Corti, M. (1995) Il binomio intertestualità e fonti: funzioni della storia nel sistema letterario. In Asor Rosa, A. (ed.) La scrittura e la storia: problemi di storiografia leteraria (Firenze: La nuova Italia), pp. 124–125.Google Scholar
13.Kennedy, P. F. (1994) Muslim sources of Dante. In Aigius, D. A. and Hitchcock, R. (eds) The Arab Influence in Medieval Europe (Reading: Ithaca), p. 79.Google Scholar
14.Hede, J. (2007) Reading Dante: The Pursuit of Meaning (Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books), pp. 56–59.Google Scholar
15.Mazour-Matusevich, Y. (2005) Writing medieval history: an interview with Aron Gurevich. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 35(1), 144–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Said, E. (1978) Orientalism (London: Pantheon), pp. 68–72.Google Scholar
17.Voegelin, E. (1998) History of Political Ideas. Vo. III: The Later Middle Ages (Columbia: University of Missouri Press), p. 66.Google Scholar
18.Dante (1996) Monarchy. Translated by Prue Shaw (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 38.Google Scholar
19.Hede, J. (2006) Unity and difference in Dante’s universal vision. Classica et Mediaevalia, 57, 239–281.Google Scholar
20.Seung, T. K. (1976) Cultural Thematics: The Formation of the Faustian Ethos (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
21.Bosco, U. (ed.) (1976) Enciclopedia dantesca (Roma: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana). See under the article Maometto.Google Scholar
22.Dante (2007) Paradiso, translated by R. Hollander and J. Hollander (New York: Doubleday). See Robert Hollander’s commentary on Par. 31: 25–27.Google Scholar