Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:35:00.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reimagining a Global Ethic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2012

Michael Ignatieff
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“Reimagining a global ethic” is a project worthy of Andrew Carnegie and of the Carnegie Council's upcoming commemoration of his founding gift in 1914. As a collaborative research project stretching forward over the next three years, it ought to be integrative and reconciliatory: that is, it must try to understand the globalization of ethics that has accompanied the globalization of commerce and communications and to figure out what ethical values human beings share across all our differences of race, religion, ethnicity, national identity, and material wealth. When human beings do disagree morally, the search for a global ethic becomes an attempt to elucidate by analysis what exactly people are disagreeing about, so that, after arguing out our differences, we can either agree to disagree or work together to find common ground. Finding common ground on large ethical matters and understanding more deeply why, in some instances, we remain at odds with each other is worthwhile in itself, but it might also further Andrew Carnegie's original goal in founding the Council, which was to reduce the amount of conflict and violence in the world.

Type
Symposium: In Search of a Global Ethic
Information
Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , Spring 2012 , pp. 7 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 This essay began life as a lecture to the Global Ethics Fellows, Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs, New York, November 10, 2011. The original version is available in audio and video format at www.carnegiecouncil.org/resources/audio/data/000714. In revising it for publication, I am grateful to Joel Rosenthal and the Ethics Fellows for their criticism and suggestions. The Council's project on reimagining a global ethic is an initiative to commemorate the centenary of the founding of the Council in 1914 by Andrew Carnegie.

2 Grotius, Hugo, The Rights of War and Peace, with the notes of J. Barbeyrac (London, Printed for W. Innys et al., 1738)Google Scholar; and Pufendorf, Samuel, Of the Law of Nature and Nations, with Mr. Barbeyrac's prefatory discourse (London, 1729)Google Scholar. On international law as a social practice, see Beitz, Charles, The Idea of Human Rights (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Kung, Hans and Schmidt, Helmut, A Global Ethic and Global Responsibilities (London: SCM Press, 1998)Google Scholar; and Kung, Hans, A Global Ethic for Global Politics and Economics (London: SCM Press, 1997)Google Scholar. See also www.weltethos.org.

4 Steiner, Henry and Alston, Philip, International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar.

5 Ignatieff, Michael, The Needs of Strangers (New York: Viking, 1984)Google Scholar.

6 See, e.g., Taha Abderrahman, A Global Ethic: Its Scope and Limits (Tabah Foundation Paper Series 1, 2008).

7 Gallie, W.B., “Essentially Contested Concepts,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, Vol. 56, (1955–1956), pp. 167–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Shklar, Judith, “Putting Cruelty First,” Daedalus 111, no. 3 (Summer 1982)Google Scholar; and Berlin, Isaiah, The Crooked Timber of Humanity, Hardy, Henry, ed., (London: John Murray, 1990), pp. 203–204Google Scholar.

9 Maritain, Jacques, The Rights of Man and Natural Law (New York: G. Bles, the Centenary Press, 1943)Google Scholar; on Maritain, see Moyn, Samuel, The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 2010)Google Scholar.

10 Wright, Robert, The Moral Animal (New York: Random House, 1994)Google Scholar; Churchland, Patricia, Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us about Morality (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pinker, Steven, The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature (New York, Penguin Books, 2002)Google Scholar; and Pinker, , How the Mind Works (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1997)Google Scholar.

11 Nagel, Thomas, The View From Nowhere (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989)Google Scholar.

12 The veil of ignorance, of course, refers to the famous heuristic employed by Rawls, John in A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1972)Google Scholar. For the global application of his theory of justice, see his The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

13 Hurka, Thomas, “The Justification of National Partiality,” in McKim, Robert and McMahan, Jeff, eds., The Morality of Nationalism (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), pp. 139–57Google Scholar; Carens, Joseph, “Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders,” Review of Politics 49, no. 2 (1987), pp. 251–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Blake, Michael, “Distributive Justice, State Coercion and Autonomy,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 30, no. 3 (2001), pp. 257–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Walzer, Michael, “The Distribution of Membership,” in Brown, Peter and Shue, Henry, eds., Boundaries (Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield, 1981), pp. 1–35Google Scholar.

14 Shue, Henry, Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1980)Google Scholar; Pogge, Thomas, “Assisting the Global Poor,” in Chatterjee, D. K., The Ethics of Assistance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 260–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Singer, Peter, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1, no. 3 (1972), pp. 229–43Google Scholar.

15 Singer, Peter, One World: The Ethics of Globalization (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2002)Google Scholar.

16 Berlin, Isaiah, “Two Concepts of Liberty,” in Hardy, Henry and Hausheer, Roger, eds., The Proper Study of Mankind: An Anthology of Essays (London: Chatto and Windus, 1997), pp. 191–243Google Scholar. For a disagreement with Berlin, see Dworkin, Ronald, Justice for Hedgehogs (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2011)Google Scholar.

17 Roth, Brad R., Sovereign Equality and Moral Disagreement (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 On the doctrine of sovereign responsibility, see Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS) (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2001)Google Scholar.

19 Singer, One World, chap. 2.

20 FGC Files Online. Harvard KSG ISP 224 reading list for Mamouna Traore and FGC Abolition in Senegal, 2004. See the International Women's Health Program at iwhp.sogc.org/index.php?page=279 and womenshealth.gov at www.womenshealth.gov/publications/our-publications/fact-sheet/female-genital-cutting.cfm.

21 Ghani, Ashraf and Lockhart, Clare, Fixing Failed States (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar; Stewart, Rory and Knaus, Gerald, Can Intervention Work? (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2011)Google Scholar; Antonio Donini, “Afghanistan: Humanitarianism under Threat,” Feinstein Center Briefing Paper, Tufts University, March 2009; Andrew Beath, Fotini Christia, and Ruben Enikolopov, “Winning Hearts and Minds through Development: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Afghanistan,” MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2011–14, October 25, 2011.

22 International Commission on Sovereignty and Intervention (Ottawa: Queen's Printer, 2001).