Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T02:09:54.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vitamin D status and predictors of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in Western Australian adolescents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2014

Lucinda J. Black*
Affiliation:
Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Sally A. Burrows
Affiliation:
School of Medicine and Pharmacology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Peter Jacoby
Affiliation:
Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Wendy H. Oddy
Affiliation:
Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Lawrence J. Beilin
Affiliation:
School of Medicine and Pharmacology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Wendy Chan She Ping-Delfos
Affiliation:
School of Medicine and Pharmacology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Carina E. Marshall
Affiliation:
School of Medicine and Pharmacology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Patrick G. Holt
Affiliation:
Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia Queensland Children's Medical Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Prue H. Hart
Affiliation:
Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Trevor A. Mori
Affiliation:
School of Medicine and Pharmacology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: L. J. Black, fax +618 9489 7700, email lblack@ichr.uwa.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the importance of skeletal growth during adolescence, there is limited research reporting vitamin D status and its predictors in adolescents. Using prospective data from the Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort (Raine) Study, we investigated vitamin D status and predictors of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations in adolescents. Serum 25(OH)D concentrations were measured in the same participants at 14 and 17 years (n 1045 at both time points). The percentage of adolescents with serum 25(OH)D concentrations < 50, 50–74·9 and ≥ 75 nmol/l was reported year-round and by month of blood collection. We examined the predictors of serum 25(OH)D concentrations, including sex, race, month of blood collection, physical activity, BMI, family income, and Ca and vitamin D intakes (n 919 at 14 years; n 570 at 17 years), using a general linear mixed model. At 14 years, 31 % of adolescents had serum 25(OH)D concentrations between 50 and 74·9 nmol/l and a further 4 % had concentrations < 50 nmol/l. At 17 years, 40 % of adolescents had serum 25(OH)D concentrations between 50 and 74·9 nmol/l and 12 % had concentrations < 50 nmol/l. Caucasian ethnicity, being sampled at the end of summer, exercising more, having a lower BMI, a higher Ca intake and a higher family income were significantly associated with higher serum 25(OH)D concentrations. The proportion of adolescents with serum 25(OH)D concentrations < 50 nmol/l was low in this Western Australian cohort. There is a need for international consensus on defining adequate vitamin D status in order to determine whether strategies to increase vitamin D status in adolescents are warranted.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2014 

The role of vitamin D in promoting bone growth and maintenance is well established( Reference Cranney, Horsley and O'Donnell 1 ), while growing evidence associates vitamin D with non-skeletal conditions, such as cancer and CVD( Reference Chung, Balk and Brendel 2 ). Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) thresholds that signal vitamin D deficiency and sufficiency remain to be controversial. The Institute of Medicine defines deficiency as serum 25(OH)D concentrations < 30 nmol/l( 3 ), while guidelines from the Endocrine Society suggest that vitamin D deficiency be defined as concentrations < 50 nmol/l and concentrations should be at least 75 nmol/l to maximise the effect of vitamin D on Ca, bone and muscle metabolism( Reference Holick, Binkley and Bischoff-Ferrari 4 ). Serum 25(OH)D concentrations well below 50 nmol/l have been reported in populations worldwide, including the UK( 5 ), Ireland( Reference Cashman, Muldowney and McNulty 6 ), the USA( Reference Forrest and Stuhldreher 7 ), Canada( Reference Whiting, Langlois and Vatanparast 8 ), Australia( Reference Daly, Gagnon and Lu 9 ), Asia and the Middle East( Reference Lips 10 ). In adolescents, Looker et al. ( Reference Looker, Johnson and Lacher 11 ) reported that 29 and 34 % of boys and girls aged 14–18 years participating in the US 2001–2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) had 25(OH)D concentrations < 50 nmol/l. In four European countries (Denmark, Finland, Ireland and Poland), 92 % of girls aged 11–13 years had 25(OH)D concentrations < 50 nmol/l at the end of winter( Reference Andersen, Molgaard and Skovgaard 12 ). Mean 25(OH)D concentrations were < 50 nmol/l in children aged 11–18 years and adults aged 19–64 years participating in the UK's National Diet and Nutrition Survey rolling programme (2008–2009)( 5 ). In a national sample of Australian adults aged over 25 years, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (defined as serum 25(OH)D concentrations < 50 nmol/l) was 31 %, while 73 % of participants had serum 25(OH)D concentrations < 75 nmol/l( Reference Daly, Gagnon and Lu 9 ).

The major source of vitamin D for humans is exposure to sunlight and a number of factors affect the cutaneous production of vitamin D including latitude, season, race, time spent outdoors, sunscreen, sun-protective clothing and age. Other factors affecting vitamin D status may include obesity and vitamin D intake. Daly et al. ( Reference Daly, Gagnon and Lu 9 ) recently examined the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and its determinants in Australian adults aged 25 years and older: advancing age, race, latitude, season, lack of physical activity, obesity and education were found to be independent predictors of vitamin D deficiency. However, similar data in Australian adolescents have not been reported. Adequate vitamin D status may be important in adolescence in order to optimise Ca absorption for skeletal growth. Therefore, understanding the predictors of vitamin D status is essential for developing public health strategies to address vitamin D deficiency. The aims of the present study were to report vitamin D status, and to examine the predictors of serum 25(OH)D concentrations, in a population-based cohort of adolescents aged 14 and 17 years in Perth, Western Australia (latitude 32°S).

Methods

Study design and population

The study population comprised adolescents who participated in the 14- and 17-year follow-ups of the Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort (Raine) Study. Raine Study methodology has been described previously( Reference Newnham, Evans and Michael 13 ). In brief, 2900 pregnant women were recruited into the Raine Study from the public antenatal clinic at King Edward Memorial Hospital or surrounding private clinics in Perth, Western Australia, between May 1989 and November 1991. A total of 2868 children underwent serial assessment at birth and at regular intervals. Data collection at the 14- and 17-year follow-ups occurred between May 2003–June 2006 and July 2006–June 2009, respectively. Recruitment and all follow-ups were approved by the ethics committees of King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women and the Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Western Australia. Informed and written consent was obtained from the participant and/or their primary caregiver at each follow-up.

Analysis of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations

At the 14- and 17-year follow-ups, serum was prepared from venous blood samples taken from an antecubital vein after an overnight fast and stored at − 80°C until analysis. Serum 25(OH)D concentrations at 14 years were measured by enzyme immunoassay (Immunodiagnostic Systems Limited). This assay did not differentiate between serum 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3. At 17 years, serum 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 concentrations were measured using isotope-dilution liquid chromatography–tandem MS (LC–MS/MS; RDDT), according to published methodology( Reference Maunsell, Wright and Rainbow 14 ). At the 17-year follow-up, only four participants had detectable serum 25(OH)D2 concentrations, with values of 5·44, 5·76, 7·23 and 8·12 nmol/l. Since the enzyme immunoassay at the 14-year follow-up did not differentiate between serum 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3, analyses at both time points were performed on total serum 25(OH)D concentrations.

We randomly selected twelve samples across the entire range (43–148 nmol/l) of 25(OH)D values obtained from the enzyme immunoassay at the 14-year follow-up and validated them with the LC–MS/MS used at the 17-year follow-up (RDDT). There was good agreement between the enzyme immunoassay and LC–MS/MS as shown in the Bland–Altman plot (Fig. S1, available online)( Reference Bland and Altman 15 ). Since the blood samples were collected year-round, serum 25(OH)D concentrations were described by month of blood collection and vitamin D status was described by season (spring, September–November; summer, December–February; autumn, March–May; winter, June–August). In order to report year-round serum 25(OH)D concentrations and vitamin D status, the seasonal component was removed (deseasonalised) by fitting a sinusoidal model to serum 25(OH)D concentrations incorporating the month the blood sample was taken, according to published methodology( Reference van der Mei, Ponsonby and Dwyer 16 ).

Potential predictors of vitamin D status

Participants were classified as Caucasian if both parents were Caucasian, or as non-Caucasian if at least one parent was of an alternate ethnicity. Participants were weighed to the nearest 100 g using a Wedderburn Digital Chair Scale, and height was determined to the nearest 0·1 cm with a Holtain stadiometer. BMI was calculated as weight (kg)/height (m2). Physical activity was assessed using a self-reported questionnaire based on exercise outside of school hours per week, with exercise defined in three categories as activity causing breathlessness or sweating ( ≥ 4 times/week, 1–3 times/week and <  1 time/week).

A self-reported, semi-quantitative FFQ developed by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Adelaide, Australia( Reference Baghurst and Record 17 ) was used to assess Ca and vitamin D intakes. This 212-item FFQ assesses usual dietary intake over the previous year, collecting information on the frequency of consumption of individual foods, mixed dishes and beverages, along with information on usual serving sizes in relation to a standard serving size in household units. Participants also recorded the type and dose of any dietary supplements consumed over the last 12 months. The composition of these supplements was derived from the product label or directly from the manufacturer to provide a total daily intake from food and supplements. At the 14-year follow-up, the primary caregiver was asked to complete the FFQ in association with the adolescent.

Statistical analyses

Characteristics of participants who provided a blood sample at both the 14- and 17-year follow-ups were compared with non-participants from the original cohort. Sex, race, family income during pregnancy, maternal age at birth, maternal education and maternal pre-pregnancy BMI were compared using χ2 tests. Baseline characteristics – including sex, age, race, month of blood collection, physical activity, BMI, and median daily vitamin D and Ca intakes from food and supplements – were described for participants who provided a blood sample at both the 14- and 17-year follow-ups. Differences between males and females in deseasonalised serum 25(OH)D concentrations were analysed using independent-samples t tests.

Serum 25(OH)D concentrations were normally distributed. To examine predictors of serum 25(OH)D concentrations, we performed a single general linear mixed model combining the 14- and 17-year data. Pearson's χ2 test was used to determine any differences in sex and race between those with complete data who were included in the final model and those with missing data who were excluded from the final model. The following categorical variables were included as potential predictors: sex; time (14-year follow-up/17-year follow-up); race (Caucasian/non-Caucasian); month of blood collection; physical activity ( ≥ 4 times/week, 1–3 times/week and < 1 time/week). Vitamin D intake from food and supplements (μg/d), Ca intake from food and supplements (g/d) and BMI were included as continuous variables, after confirming a linear relationship with serum 25(OH)D concentrations. Interactions between time and sex, physical activity, Ca intake, vitamin D intake and BMI were investigated along with interactions between sex and physical activity, Ca intake, vitamin D intake and BMI. Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics Release version 19.9.9.1 (IBM SPSS, Inc.) and StataCorp 2011 Stata Statistical Software, Release 12 (StataCorp LP). Statistical significance was defined as two-tailed P <0·05.

Results

Characteristics of the participants

A total of 1045 adolescents provided a blood sample for the analysis of serum 25(OH)D concentrations at both follow-ups (Fig. 1). Complete data – including physical activity, BMI, Ca and vitamin D intakes, and family income – were available for 919 adolescents at the 14-year follow-up and 570 adolescents at the 17-year follow-up. Compared with those from the original cohort who did not participant in the present study (n 1823), participants completing both the 14- and 17-year follow-ups (n 1045) were more likely to be Caucasian, to come from families with a higher income during pregnancy and to have mothers with a higher age, higher education and healthier BMI (Table 1).

Fig. 1 Flow diagram of adolescents attending the 14- and 17-year follow-ups. 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

Table 1 Characteristics of the participants providing a blood sample at both follow-ups (14 and 17 years; n 1045) v. non-participants from the original cohort (n 1823) (Number of participants and percentages)

Approximately 51 % of the participants who provided a blood sample at both the 14- and 17-year follow-ups were male and 85 % were Caucasian (Table 2). At 14 years, 10 % of the participants were physically inactive (exercising < 1 time/week), increasing to 21 % at 17 years. The mean BMI at 14 years was 21 kg/m2, increasing to 23 kg/m2 at 17 years. Median daily vitamin D intake from food and supplements at 14 years was 2·0 μg, decreasing to 1·6 μg at 17 years. Median daily Ca intake from food and supplements was 1107 mg at 14 years, decreasing to 1018 mg at 17 years.

Table 2 Characteristics of the Raine Study participants for whom serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations were available at both follow-ups (14 and 17 years; n 1045) (Number of participants and percentages; mean values and standard deviations; median values and interquartile ranges (IQR))

* Mean value was significantly different from that of females (P< 0·05).

Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations and vitamin D status

At 14 years, mean deseasonalised serum 25(OH)D concentration was 86 nmol/l, with levels in males significantly higher than in females (Table 2). At 17 years, mean deseasonalised serum 25(OH)D concentrations decreased to 75 nmol/l, and there was no significant difference between males and females. A total of 31 % of adolescents at the 14-year follow-up had serum 25(OH)D concentrations between 50 and 74·9 nmol/l and a further 4 % had concentrations < 50 nmol/l (Table 2). At 17 years, the percentage of adolescents with concentrations between 50 and 74·9 nmol/l and < 50 nmol/l increased to 40 and 12 %, respectively. Mean serum 25(OH)D concentrations were highest at the end of summer (Fig. 2). At the 14-year follow-up, 10 % of adolescents in winter and 4 % in spring had serum 25(OH)D concentrations < 50 nmol/l, increasing to 28 and 21 %, respectively, in the 17-year follow-up (Table 3; Fig. S2, available online).

Fig. 2 Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations of participants providing a blood sample at both follow-ups (n 1045), stratified by month of blood collection (spring, September–November; summer, December–February; autumn, March–May; winter, June–August). , Male (14 years); , female (14 years); , male (17 years); , female (17 years).

Table 3 Vitamin D status at the 14- and 17-year follow-ups (n 1045), stratified by sex and season of blood collection* (Number of participants and percentages)

* Spring, September–November; summer, December–February; autumn, March–May; winter, June–August.

Deseasonalised serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations.

Predictors of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations

There were no significant differences in sex or race between those with complete data who were included in the final model and those with missing data who were excluded from the final model. Caucasian ethnicity, being sampled at the end of summer, exercising more, having a lower BMI, a higher Ca intake and a higher family income were significantly associated with higher serum 25(OH)D concentrations (Table 4). Vitamin D intakes from food and supplements were not significantly associated with serum 25(OH)D concentrations. There was a significant interaction between sex and time. At the 14-year follow-up, serum 25(OH)D concentrations were significantly higher in males (P =0·026); at the 17-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in serum 25(OH)D concentrations between males and females (P =0·194).

Table 4 General linear mixed model of predictors of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations at the 14- and 17-year follow-ups (β-Coefficients and 95 % confidence intervals)

* Estimated difference in serum 25(OH)D concentrations from the reference category of categorical variables or per unit increase of continuous variables.

Compared with males, females had significantly lower serum 25(OH)D concentrations at the 14-year follow-up (β − 3·6, 95 % CI − 6·8, − 0·4; P= 0·026), while there was no significant difference in serum 25(OH)D concentrations between males and females at the 17-year follow-up (β 2·6, 95 % CI − 1·3, 6·5; P= 0·194; data not shown).

Discussion

The percentage of adolescents with serum 25(OH)D concentrations < 50 nmol/l was substantially lower in this Western Australian cohort compared with global reports in similar age groups. In a nationally representative sample of 4- to 18-year-olds in Great Britain (n 1102), 35 % of participants had concentrations < 50 nmol/l( Reference Absoud, Cummins and Lim 18 ). Similarly, in the 2001–2006 NHANES, 29 and 34 % of 14- to 18-year-old boys and girls (n 3801), respectively, had concentrations < 50 nmol/l( Reference Lips 10 ). In a cross-sectional study of 12- and 15-year-olds in Northern Ireland (n 1015), 36 % of participants had year-round serum 25(OH)D concentrations < 50 nmol/l( Reference Hill, Cotter and Mitchell 19 ), while 26 % of 12- to 19-year-olds (n 231) participating in the Canadian Health Measures Survey Cycle 1 (2007–2009) had concentrations < 50 nmol/l( Reference Whiting, Langlois and Vatanparast 8 ). Perth and surrounding regions have a mean of 8·8 daily hours of sunshine( 20 ), encouraging an outdoor lifestyle. Higher sun exposure may partly explain the higher serum 25(OH)D concentrations in this adolescent cohort compared with other populations. Furthermore, the Raine cohort is predominantly Caucasian, which may contribute to the higher serum 25(OH)D concentrations compared with reports from the UK, USA and Canada. However, despite the low percentage of adolescents with serum 25(OH)D concentrations < 50 nmol/l in our cohort compared with international populations, the percentage of adolescents in this cohort with concentrations between 50 and 74·9 nmol/l was substantial.

Recently, Daly et al. ( Reference Daly, Gagnon and Lu 9 ) reported the vitamin D status in a national sample of Australian adults (n 11 247) from each of the six states and the Northern Territory. They reported that approximately 60 % of participants aged 25–34 years had serum 25(OH)D concentrations < 75 nmol/l, which is similar to 17-year-olds in our cohort. The authors suggested a number of potential factors that may have contributed to the relatively high level of vitamin D insufficiency (as defined by the authors as < 75 nmol/l) in adults across Australia, including sun-consciousness (including sun avoidance, use of sunscreen or protective clothing), low levels of physical activity, inadequate vitamin D intake and the increasing prevalence of obesity. In 272 healthy Tasmanian adults ( < 60 years old), 49 % had year-round serum 25(OH)D concentrations < 50 nmol/l( Reference van der Mei, Ponsonby and Engelsen 21 ). Compared with the present study, this higher prevalence of participants with serum 25(OH)D concentrations < 50 nmol/l may reflect both the difference in latitude between Hobart and Perth (42°S and 32°S, respectively) and the older age of the participants.

In the present study, season was a strong predictor of serum 25(OH)D concentrations, with the percentage of adolescents with serum 25(OH)D concentrations ≥ 75 nmol/l approximately 2-fold higher in summer compared with winter. Similar seasonal differences in vitamin D levels have been reported previously in Australian adults( Reference Daly, Gagnon and Lu 9 , Reference van der Mei, Ponsonby and Engelsen 21 ) and in European populations( Reference Andersen, Molgaard and Skovgaard 12 , Reference Hill, Flynn and Kiely 22 , Reference Ruston, Hoare and Henderson 23 ). It is well known that latitude and season affect cutaneous vitamin D production. At latitudes above 37°, winter sunlight is not of sufficient intensity to promote cutaneous production of vitamin D, and very little vitamin D synthesis occurs at lower latitudes in the morning or late afternoon during winter months( Reference Holick 24 ). In addition, vitamin D synthesis is reduced in cloudy conditions compared with clear sky( Reference Kimlin 25 ). Despite the relatively low latitude of Perth (32°S), we saw a substantial increase in those with serum 25(OH)D concentrations < 75 nmol/l during winter and spring, which may be a product of low sunlight intensity, less time spent outdoors and increased cloud cover. Physical activity is often used as a proxy for the amount of time spent outdoors and, therefore, of sunlight exposure. We identified physical activity as a significant predictor of serum 25(OH)D concentrations in adolescents – a finding that has also been reported in Australian adults( Reference Daly, Gagnon and Lu 9 ) and children in Great Britain( Reference Absoud, Cummins and Lim 18 ).

Higher BMI was associated with lower serum 25(OH)D concentrations in this population of adolescents. The relationship between obesity and vitamin D deficiency remains ambiguous. Recent evidence suggests that the inverse association between body fat and 25(OH)D levels is related to the dilution of vitamin D in the large fat mass of obese patients( Reference Drincic, Armas and van Diest 26 ). It is also possible that obesity results in lower vitamin D levels due to decreased sun exposure from a sedentary indoor lifestyle( Reference Scragg and Camargo 27 ). Obesity has been reported as a determinant of vitamin D status in Australian adults( Reference Daly, Gagnon and Lu 9 ) and international populations from the USA( Reference Forrest and Stuhldreher 7 ), the UK( Reference Absoud, Cummins and Lim 18 ) and Ireland( Reference Hill, Cotter and Mitchell 19 ). Since the prevalence of obesity is increasing in Australia, the assessment and treatment of low vitamin D levels in these at-risk individuals may be warranted.

In this cohort, vitamin D intake from food and supplements was not associated with serum 25(OH)D concentrations, which is similar to the findings in a Tasmanian cohort study of 8-year-olds (n 201)( Reference Jones, Blizzard and Riley 28 ). Vitamin D occurs naturally in fish, meat, egg yolk and mushrooms, many of which are consumed episodically and contain relatively small amounts of vitamin D( Reference Calvo, Whiting and Barton 29 ). It is generally recognised that diet alone is insufficient to maintain adequate vitamin D status( Reference Kiely and Black 30 ). Rather, we found that Ca intake was associated with higher serum 25(OH)D concentrations. It has been shown that higher Ca intake reduces circulating concentrations of calcitriol, which subsequently raises serum 25(OH)D concentrations( Reference Berlin and Bjorkhem 31 ).

In this adolescent cohort, males had significantly higher serum 25(OH)D concentrations than females at the 14-year follow-up. Lower vitamin D status in girls has also been reported in children and adolescents in Northern Ireland( Reference Hill, Cotter and Mitchell 19 ), the USA( Reference Looker, Johnson and Lacher 11 ) and New Zealand( Reference Rockell, Green and Skeaff 32 ). It is not clear why vitamin D status differs between boys and girls. Hill et al. ( Reference Hill, Cotter and Mitchell 19 ) found that girls had a lower vitamin D intake than boys, while Rockell et al. ( Reference Rockell, Green and Skeaff 32 ) noted that physical activity was higher in boys than in girls. However, in the present study, serum 25(OH)D concentrations were higher in males than in females at 14 years after adjusting for confounding factors, including physical activity and vitamin D intake. Therefore, the observed sex differences may be due to a confounder that was not included in the model or may be related to outdoor activity that was not captured by our measurement of physical activity. Serum 25(OH)D concentrations decreased more in males than in females between 14 and 17 years, and there was no significant difference between the sexes at the 17-year follow-up. Overall, serum 25(OH)D concentrations were lower at 17 years than at 14 years. Increasing vitamin D deficiency has also been observed in children and adolescents in the USA, where the risk of deficiency increased significantly with age until 30 years in males and 18 years in females( Reference Looker, Johnson and Lacher 11 ).

It is important to note that the thresholds for vitamin D deficiency are controversial. The Clinical Guidelines Subcommittee of the Endocrine Society defines vitamin D deficiency as serum 25(OH)D concentrations < 50 nmol/l( Reference Holick, Binkley and Bischoff-Ferrari 4 ), whereas the Institute of Medicine defines deficiency as < 30 nmol/l, stating that practically all persons are sufficient at concentrations of 50 nmol/l and above( 3 ). Substituting 50 nmol/l for 30 nmol/l to define deficiency has a major impact on the prevalence estimates of deficiency, and there is a pressing need for consensus in defining 25(OH)D thresholds for vitamin D deficiency, insufficiency and sufficiency.

Furthermore, there is substantial variation in the analytical techniques used to measure circulating 25(OH)D concentrations. Differences in methodology have led to a significant variation in the measurement of 25(OH)D concentration depending on the laboratory and assay used, confounding the diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency. A cross-calibration of the 25(OH)D assays of five laboratories showed that the mean 25(OH)D concentration was 80 % higher using a competitive protein-binding assay compared with HPLC, while RIA gave intermediate values( Reference Lips, Chapuy and Dawson-Hughes 33 ). A further study involving six laboratories found markedly different results in 25(OH)D yields, and authors have concluded that a diagnosis of low or normal vitamin D status in an individual is dependent on the laboratory used( Reference Binkley, Krueger and Cowgill 34 ). LC–MS/MS is now considered a definitive method of quantifying 25(OH)D concentrations( Reference Glendenning and Inderjeeth 35 ), and the Vitamin D Standardization Program has developed protocols for standardising the measurement of 25(OH)D concentration using LC–MS/MS( Reference Sempos, Vesper and Phinney 36 ). A recent evaluation of the Vitamin D Standardization Program protocols found that the comparison between serum 25(OH)D concentrations measured by enzyme immunoassay and reanalysed using LC–MS/MS was not linear, but involved two linear relations, one for concentrations < 46·6 nmol/l and the other for concentrations greater than or equal to this cut-off( Reference Cashman, Kiely and Kinsella 37 ).

A strength of the present study was the longitudinal nature of the data, allowing us to investigate differences in the predictors of serum 25(OH)D concentrations over time. A further strength was access to comprehensive data that may influence serum 25(OH)D concentrations, including BMI, physical activity, family income and dietary intakes of Ca and vitamin D from food and supplements. A limitation of the present study was the loss to follow-up. Participants included in the present study were more likely to be from families with higher socio-economic status compared with those in the original cohort. However, the original Raine cohort slightly over-represented socially disadvantaged families, and children of socially disadvantaged families were less likely to remain in the Raine Study after the 3rd year. Therefore, the remaining cohort is more representative of the general Western Australian population than the original cohort( Reference Huang, Mori and Burke 38 , Reference Huang, Mori and Burrows 39 ).

The present study has shown that, among adolescents living at latitude 32°S in Perth, Western Australia, the percentage with serum 25(OH)D concentrations < 50 nmol/l is low compared with international populations. However, the percentage of adolescents with serum 25(OH)D concentrations < 75 nmol/l is substantial, particularly during winter months. Given that the thresholds of vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency are controversial, there is a need for international consensus on defining adequate vitamin D status in order to determine whether strategies to increase vitamin D status in adolescents are warranted.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S000711451400186X

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Raine Study participants and their families, and thank the Raine Study Team, for cohort coordination and data collection.

Core funding for the Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort (Raine) Study is provided by the University of Western Australia; the Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences at the University of Western Australia; the Telethon Institute for Child Health Research; the Women and Infants Research Foundation; Curtin University; and the Raine Medical Research Foundation. Specific data collection for the 14-year follow-up was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (no. 211912). Data collection and biological specimens at the 17-year follow-up were funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (programme grant ID 353514 and project grant ID 403981) and the Ada Bartholomew Medical Research Trust. L. J. Black was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council Project no. 1022134 (2012–2014).

The authors’ contributions are as follows: L. J. Black wrote the manuscript, conducted the statistical analyses, contributed to the interpretation of the data and the critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; S. A. B. and P. J. contributed to the statistical analyses and the interpretation of the data; W. H. O., P. H. H. and P. G. H. contributed to the acquisition of the data and the critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, and was responsible for securing funding for the research; L. J. Beilin and T. A. M. contributed to study concept and design, acquisition of the data, analysis and interpretation of the data and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; W. C. S. P.-D. was responsible for obtaining funding for the assay of 17-year serum 25(OH)D concentrations and contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; C. E. M. contributed to the interpretation of the data and the critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1 Cranney, A, Horsley, T, O'Donnell, S, et al. (2007) Effectiveness and Safety of Vitamin D in Relation to Bone Health. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 158. (Prepared by the University of Ottawa Evidence-based Practice Center (UO-EPC) under Contract No. 290-02-0021). AHRQ Publication No. 07-E013. Rockville, MD: AHRQ.Google Scholar
2 Chung, M, Balk, EM, Brendel, M, et al. (2009) Vitamin D and Calcium: A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 183. (Prepared by the Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. HHSA 290-2007-10055-I). AHRQ Publication No. 09-E015. Rockville, MD: AHRQ.Google Scholar
3 Institute of Medicine (2011) Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
4 Holick, MF, Binkley, NC, Bischoff-Ferrari, HA, et al. (2011) Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96, 19111930.Google Scholar
5 Department of Health (2011) National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Headline Results from Years 1 and 2 (combined) of the Rolling Programme 2008/9–2009/10. London: Department of Health. http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_128550.pdf (accessed accessed August 2014).Google Scholar
6 Cashman, KD, Muldowney, S, McNulty, B, et al. (2012) Vitamin D status of Irish adults: findings from the National Adult Nutrition Survey. Br J Nutr 109, 12481256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Forrest, KY & Stuhldreher, WL (2011) Prevalence and correlates of vitamin D deficiency in US adults. Nutr Res 31, 4854.Google Scholar
8 Whiting, SJ, Langlois, KA, Vatanparast, H, et al. (2011) The vitamin D status of Canadians relative to the 2011 Dietary Reference Intakes: an examination in children and adults with and without supplement use. Am J Clin Nutr 94, 128135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Daly, RM, Gagnon, C, Lu, ZX, et al. (2012) Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and its determinants in Australian adults aged 25 years and older: a national, population-based study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 77, 2635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Lips, P (2007) Vitamin D status and nutrition in Europe and Asia. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 103, 620625.Google Scholar
11 Looker, AC, Johnson, CL, Lacher, DA, et al. (2011) Vitamin D status: United States, 2001–2006. NCHS Data Brief 59, 18.Google Scholar
12 Andersen, R, Molgaard, C, Skovgaard, LT, et al. (2005) Teenage girls and elderly women living in northern Europe have low winter vitamin D status. Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 533541.Google Scholar
13 Newnham, JP, Evans, SF, Michael, CA, et al. (1993) Effects of frequent ultrasound during pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 342, 887891.Google Scholar
14 Maunsell, Z, Wright, DJ & Rainbow, SJ (2005) Routine isotope-dilution liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry assay for simultaneous measurement of the 25-hydroxy metabolites of vitamins D2 and D3. Clin Chem 51, 16831690.Google Scholar
15 Bland, JM & Altman, DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1, 307310.Google Scholar
16 van der Mei, IA, Ponsonby, AL, Dwyer, T, et al. (2007) Vitamin D levels in people with multiple sclerosis and community controls in Tasmania, Australia. J Neurol 254, 581590.Google Scholar
17 Baghurst, KI & Record, SJ (1984) A computerised dietary analysis system for use with diet diaries or food frequency questionnaires. Community Health Stud 8, 1118.Google Scholar
18 Absoud, M, Cummins, C, Lim, MJ, et al. (2011) Prevalence and predictors of vitamin D insufficiency in children: a Great Britain population based study. PLoS ONE 6, e22179.Google Scholar
19 Hill, TR, Cotter, AA, Mitchell, S, et al. (2008) Vitamin D status and its determinants in adolescents from the Northern Ireland Young Hearts 2000 cohort. Br J Nutr 99, 10611067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Bureau of Meteorology (2012) Climate Statistics for Australian Locations. Canberra: Bureau of Meteorology. http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/ncc/cdio/cvg/av?p_stn_num = 009021&p_prim_element_index = 30&p_display_type = statGraph&period_of_avg = ALL&normals_years = allYearOfData&staticPage = (accessed accessed August 2014).Google Scholar
21 van der Mei, IA, Ponsonby, AL, Engelsen, O, et al. (2007) The high prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency across Australian populations is only partly explained by season and latitude. Environ Health Perspect 115, 11321139.Google Scholar
22 Hill, TR, Flynn, A, Kiely, M, et al. (2006) Prevalence of suboptimal vitamin D status in young, adult and elderly Irish subjects. Ir Med J 99, 4849.Google Scholar
23 Ruston, D, Hoare, J, Henderson, L, et al. (2004) The National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Adults Aged 19 to 64 years. Nutritional Status (Anthropometry and Blood Analytes), Blood Pressure and Physical Activity. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
24 Holick, MF (2004) Vitamin D: importance in the prevention of cancers, type 1 diabetes, heart disease, and osteoporosis. Am J Clin Nutr 79, 362371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25 Kimlin, MG (2008) Geographic location and vitamin D synthesis. Mol Aspects Med 29, 453461.Google Scholar
26 Drincic, AT, Armas, LAG, van Diest, EE, et al. (2012) Volumetric dilution, rather than sequestration best explains the low vitamin D status of obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring) 20, 14441448.Google Scholar
27 Scragg, R & Camargo, CA Jr (2008) Frequency of leisure-time physical activity and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in the US population: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Epidemiol 168, 577586.Google Scholar
28 Jones, G, Blizzard, C, Riley, MD, et al. (1999) Vitamin D levels in prepubertal children in Southern Tasmania: prevalence and determinants. Eur J Clin Nutr 53, 824829.Google Scholar
29 Calvo, MS, Whiting, SJ & Barton, CN (2003) Vitamin D fortification in the United States and Canada: current status and data needs. Am J Clin Nutr 80, 1710S1716S.Google Scholar
30 Kiely, M & Black, LJ (2012) Dietary strategies to maintain adequacy of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 243, 1423.Google ScholarPubMed
31 Berlin, T & Bjorkhem, I (1988) Effect of calcium intake on serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. Eur J Clin Invest 18, 5255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 Rockell, JE, Green, TJ, Skeaff, CM, et al. (2005) Season and ethnicity are determinants of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in New Zealand children aged 5–14 y. J Nutr 135, 26022608.Google Scholar
33 Lips, P, Chapuy, MC, Dawson-Hughes, B, et al. (1999) An international comparison of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurements. Osteoporos Int 9, 394397.Google Scholar
34 Binkley, N, Krueger, D, Cowgill, CS, et al. (2004) Assay variation confounds the diagnosis of hypovitaminosis D: a call for standardization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89, 31523157.Google Scholar
35 Glendenning, P & Inderjeeth, CA (2012) Vitamin D: methods of 25 hydroxyvitamin D analysis, targeting at risk populations and selecting thresholds of treatment. Clin Biochem 45, 901906.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36 Sempos, CT, Vesper, HW, Phinney, KW, et al. (2012) Vitamin D status as an international issue: national surveys and the problem of standardization. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 243, 3240.Google Scholar
37 Cashman, KD, Kiely, M, Kinsella, M, et al. (2013) Evaluation of Vitamin D Standardization Program protocols for standardizing serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D data: a case study of the program's potential for national nutrition and health surveys. Am J Clin Nutr 97, 12351242.Google Scholar
38 Huang, RC, Mori, TA, Burke, V, et al. (2009) Synergy between adiposity, insulin resistance, metabolic risk factors, and inflammation in adolescents. Diabetes Care 32, 695701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39 Huang, RC, Mori, TA, Burrows, S, et al. (2012) Sex dimorphism in the relation between early adiposity and cardiometabolic risk in adolescents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97, E1014E1022.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Flow diagram of adolescents attending the 14- and 17-year follow-ups. 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

Figure 1

Table 1 Characteristics of the participants providing a blood sample at both follow-ups (14 and 17 years; n 1045) v. non-participants from the original cohort (n 1823) (Number of participants and percentages)

Figure 2

Table 2 Characteristics of the Raine Study participants for whom serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations were available at both follow-ups (14 and 17 years; n 1045) (Number of participants and percentages; mean values and standard deviations; median values and interquartile ranges (IQR))

Figure 3

Fig. 2 Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations of participants providing a blood sample at both follow-ups (n 1045), stratified by month of blood collection (spring, September–November; summer, December–February; autumn, March–May; winter, June–August). , Male (14 years); , female (14 years); , male (17 years); , female (17 years).

Figure 4

Table 3 Vitamin D status at the 14- and 17-year follow-ups (n 1045), stratified by sex and season of blood collection* (Number of participants and percentages)

Figure 5

Table 4 General linear mixed model of predictors of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations at the 14- and 17-year follow-ups (β-Coefficients and 95 % confidence intervals)

Supplementary material: PDF

Black Supplementary Material

Figures S1-S2

Download Black Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 158.7 KB