We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 July 2013
Signs of improvement in the early twentieth-century Brazilian economy enabled a process of urban renewal. One of the most visible features of Brazilian urban modernization was street and house lighting, as well as electricity for tramways and industry. Conflicts between the Canadian company Light and the Brazilian firm CBEE over the supply of urban electricity to Brazil's main economic centers—Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, and Salvador—mirror the contradictions in the country's capitalist formation during the first decades of the twentieth century. From an emerging market view, and through political debates, this article addresses the development of electric utilities in major Brazilian cities.
1 For British imperialism in Latin America, see Rippy, J. Fred, British Investment in Latin America, 1822–1949 (Hamden, Conn., 1966)Google Scholar; Stone, Irving, “British Long-Term Investment in Latin America, 1865–1913,” Business History Review 42 (Autumn 1968): 311–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Cain, P. J. and Hopkins, A. G., British Imperialism: Innovation and Expansion, 1688–1914 (London, 1993)Google Scholar. For new perspectives to this debate, see: O'Brien, Patrick K. and de la Escosura, Leandro Prados, “Balance Sheets for the Acquisition, Retention and Loss of European Empires Overseas,” Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Working Papers (Madrid, 1998–1999)Google Scholar; O'Brien, Patrick K., “Imperialism and the Rise and Decline of the British Economy, 1688–1989,” New Left Review 238 (1999)Google Scholar; and Williamson, Jeffrey G., “Winners and Losers over Two Centuries of Globalization,” NBER Working Paper no. 9161 (Sept. 2002)Google Scholar.
2 Hausman, William, Hertner, Peter, and Wilkins, Mira, Global Electrification: Multinational Enterprise and International Finance in the History of Light and Power, 1878–2000 (New York, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 For the performance of foreign electric-utility companies and the evolution of the electric-power industry, please see: Hausman, Hertner, and Wilkins, Global Electrification; Hertner, Peter and Nelles, H. V., “Contrasting Styles of Foreign Investment: A Comparison of the Entrepreneurship, Technology, and Finance of German and Canadian Enterprises in Barcelona Electrification,” Revue économique 58, no. 1 (2007): 191–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wilkins, Mira and Schröter, Harm, eds., The Free-Standing Company in the World Economy (Oxford, 1998)Google Scholar; and Jones, Charles, “Great Capitalists and the Direction of British Overseas Investment in the Late Nineteenth Century: The Case of Argentina,” Business History 22, no. 2 (1980): 152–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a view of Spanish multinationals in Latin America, see Fernández-Moya, María, “Creating Knowledge Networks: Spanish Multinational Publishers in Mexico,” Business History Review 86 (Spring 2012): 69–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Hausman, , Hertner, , and Wilkins, , Global Electrification, 57Google Scholar; Albert Broder also indicates that these agreements defined the market division between electric industries and utility companies. For these topics, see Broder, : “Os bancos e o desenvolvimiento da indústria de energia elétrica,” Anais do 1.° Seminário Nacional de História e Energia, vol. 2 (São Paulo, 1986)Google Scholar.
5 Lanciotti, Norma, “Ciclos de vida en empresas de servicios públicos: Las compañias norteamericanas y britânicas de electricidad en Argentina, 1887–1950,” Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History 26 (Winter 2008): 403–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and “Foreign Investments in Electric Utilities: A Comparative Analysis of Belgian and American Companies in Argentina, 1890–1960,” Business History Review 82 (Autumn 2008): 503–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 George Young, “German Banks and German Direct Investment in Latin America, 1880–1920: The Case of Electricity,” and Cavieres, Eduardo, “Foreign Investors and Investments in Chile, 1860–1930: State of the Art and Perspectives,” both in Foreign Investment in Latin America: Impact on Economic Development, 1850–1930, ed. Marichal, Carlos (Milan, 1994)Google Scholar.
7 Armstrong, Christopher and Nelles, H. V., Southern Exposure: Canadian Promoters in Latin America and the Caribbean, 1890–1930 (Toronto, 1988)Google Scholar; McDowall, Duncan, The Light: Brazilian Traction, Light and Power Company Limited, 1899–1945 (Toronto, 1988)Google Scholar; and Liehr, Reinhard and Bautista, Mariano T., “Las compañías eléctricas extranjeras y la modernización urbana e industrial de México, 1880–1960,” paper presented at the 15th World Economic History Congress, Utrecht, 2009Google Scholar.
8 Indeed, despite the fact that CBEE was a sales representative for General Electric in Brazil, its main income was revenue from the services it provided at the port of Santos, whose concession had been granted to their directors, Eduardo Guinle and Cândido Gaffrée, in 1888. For CBEE, see Barros, Geraldo, Guilherme Guinle: 1882–1960 (Rio de Janeiro, 1982)Google Scholar; Honorato, Cezar, O polvo e o porto (São Paulo, 1996)Google Scholar; Hansen, Cláudia, O poder da Companhia Brasileira de Energia Elétrica em Petrópolis (1909–1927) (Niterói, 2006)Google Scholar; Saes, Alexandre Macchione, Conflitos do capital (Bauru, 2010)Google Scholar; and CBEE Reports, Brazil's National Archives (Rio de Janeiro), Companhia Brasileira de Energia Elétrica (1909–1930).
9 Canadian entrepreneurs foresaw this need. Duncan McDowall reports on discussions between Light's representatives Robert Brown and Hugh L. Cooper about funding hydraulic sources for the company's electric-power production; McDowall, , The Light, 33Google Scholar.
10 For works addressing the importance of electric power in the transformation of economic and social life, see Hobsbawm, Eric, The Age of Empire, 1875–1914 (London, 1987)Google Scholar; and Landes, David, The Unbound Prometheus (Cambridge, UK, 1969)Google Scholar.
11 Jean-Marie Martin synthesizes that period, defining the Brazilian electric market in 1930 as a dichotomic structure: on the one hand, small and archaic municipal companies, and on the other, two huge foreign companies, Light and AMFORP (the latter having incorporated CBEE). Both companies controlled Brazil's most dynamic markets. This process was accelerated during the 1920s, when regional networks were greatly expanded. Martin, Jean-Marie, Processus d'industrialization et devéloppement énergétique du Brésil (Paris, 1966)Google Scholar.
12 Valladão, Alfredo, Regime jurídico das águas e da indústria hidroelétrica (São Paulo, 1941)Google Scholar.
13 Broder, “Os bancos.”
14 Coruja, Antonio Jr., Repertório das leis, decretos, consultas, instruções, portarías, avisos e circulares relativos à concessão, administraçã;o e fiscalização das estradas de ferro (Rio de Janeiro, 1886)Google Scholar.
15 “Decreto no. 5.407 of 27 Dec. 1904,” T.12.5.030, Coelba Archives, State of Bahia.
16 Rocha, Amara, “A seduçã;o da luz: Eletrificação e urbanização no Rio de Janeiro da Belle Époque,” Anais do II Congresso Brasileiro de História Econômica, vol. 4 (Niterói, 1996)Google Scholar.
17 da Eletricidade, Memória, Debates parlamentares sobre energia elétrica na Primeira República: Oprocesso legislativo (Rio de Janeiro, 1990), 158Google Scholar.
18 Lamarão, Sérgio, A energia elétrica e o parque industrial carioca (1880–1920) (Niterói, 1997), 198–99Google Scholar.
19 Ibid., 194.
20 Minutes of the Municipal Chamber, Assembléia Legislativa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (hereafter Alerj), 20 Feb. 1905.
21 Cia. de Carris, Luz e Força do Rio de Janeiro Ltd., Eletricidade e gás: Legislação—contratos (Rio de Janeiro, 1940)Google Scholar.
22 “Lei no. 330 of 4 July 1898,” T.5.4.009, Coelba Archives, State of Bahia; and “Municipal Council Record,” Salvador Municipal Archive, 27 Feb. 1907.
23 Law no. 407 of 21 July 1899, article 12.
24 For Light's history, see Souza, Edgar, A história da Light (São Paulo, 1982)Google Scholar; Armstrong and Nelles, Southern Exposure; McDowall, The Light; Gauld, Charles, The Last Titan: Percival Farquhar, American Entrepreneur in Latin America (Stanford, 1964)Google Scholar; and Light's Annual Reports (1902–1920), São Paulo state's Eletropaulo Archive.
25 Data of Guinle & Co. from Rio de Janeiro National Archive, Commercial Board L 431 R 54088 (1904). For data on CBEE's origin, see “CBEE Constitution Meeting, 8 July 1909,” Official Newspaper of the Government of Brazil, 4248–49, National Archive, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar.
26 Souza, , A história da Light, 29Google Scholar.
27 Weid, Elizabeth, “Estratégias de implantação de uma multinacional numa cidade latinoamericana: The Rio de Janeiro Light and Power Co. 1899–1910,” Anais do II Congresso Brasileiro de História Econômica, vol. 4 (Niterói, 1996), 237Google Scholar.
28 Rio de Janeiro Tramway, Light and Power Co. (Rio Light), Annual Report, 1908, 11Google Scholar.
29 Gauld, , The Last Titan, 125Google Scholar.
30 Contract between Siemens & Halske and The Bahia Light and Power, 5 Nov. 1907, T.23.4.005, Coelba Archives (State of Bahia).
31 Armstrong, and Nelles, , Southern Exposure, 89Google Scholar.
32 Gauld, , The Last Titan, 130Google Scholar.
33 O Estado de São Paulo and A Gazeta (1909–1912), São Paulo State Public ArchiveGoogle Scholar; Jornal do Commercio (1909–1915), National Library, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar; Diário de Notícias (1909–1915), Bahia State LibraryGoogle Scholar.
34 Eduardo Guinle's letter to the city of São Paulo in O Estado de São Paulo, 6 Mar. 1909.
35 Light's, São Paulo letter submitting application for services, Town Council Report, São Paulo, 26 June 1911Google Scholar.
36 Editorial of Engineer Club Magazine (1922): 49–57Google Scholar.
37 Éclairage's contract revision, Town Council Report, Salvador, 28 Sept. 1910Google Scholar.
38 Official Newspaper of the Government of Brazil, 28 Apr. 1910, National Archive Rio de Janeiro.
39 Light, São Paulo, Annual Report, 1902–1920Google Scholar, and CBEE, Balance Sheets, 1909–1927Google Scholar.
40 O Estado de São Paulo, 6 Mar. 1909.
41 “A Light e a Docas,” A Notícia, 9 Oct. 1907.
42 Castro, Francisco Jr., O privilégio da Light and Power (Rio de Janeiro, 1909)Google Scholar.
43 “Energia Electrica: Ordem do dia,” O Estado de São Paulo, 6 Mar. 1909, 5Google Scholar.
44 “Custos da Energia Electrica,” A Platéia, 11 Mar. 1909; “A Light,” O Commercio de São Paulo, 22 Feb. 1909. As the company reported to its shareholders in Canada, “We anticipate a relationship with the new administration with the utmost cordiality.” São Paulo Light Annual Report, 1910, 1–8.
45 Law no. 1210 of 29 Apr. 1900, interpretation of Law no. 407 of 1889.
46 Annals of São Paulo's State Senate (São Paulo, 1909), 50Google Scholar.
47 Municipal Decree of 22 Nov. 1906, Minutes of the Municipal Council, Alerj, 20 Aug. 1907.
48 Minutes of the Municipal Council, Alerj, 20 Aug. 1907.
49 Ibid., 28 Sept. 1907.
50 Ibid., 20 July 1907.
51 Ibid., 31 July 1907.
52 Ibid., 9 Aug. 1907.
53 McDowall, , The Light, 148Google Scholar. Some years later, Rio Light would defend its tramway concession against the municipal intention to provide a streetcar service; see Boone, Christopher, “Streetcars and Politics in Rio de Janeiro: Private Enterprise vs. Municipal Government in the Provision of Mass Transit, 1903–1920,” Journal of Latin American Studies 27, no. 2 (1995): 343–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
54 Minutes of the Municipal Council, Salvador Municipal Archive (Sept. 1910), 23.
55 Diário de Notícias, 6 Aug. 1909, Bahia State Archive (film 27-flash 1).
56 Minutes of the Municipal Council, 27 Mar. 1907, Salvador Municipal Archive.
57 Ibid., 16 Jan. 1914.
58 Ibid., 21 Jan. 1915.
59 Torres, Alberto, “Light Farquhar: a conquista do Brasil,” in O Estado de São Paulo, 26 Oct. 1912Google Scholar.
60 “As eleições e a Light,” A Platéia, 10 July 1907.
61 Light, São Paulo, Annual Report, 1909, 48–54Google Scholar.
