Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T19:11:04.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Religion and the Rise of Liberalism: The First Disestablishment Campaign in Scotland, 1829–1843

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Stewart J. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Ecclesiastical History, University of Edinburgh, New College, Mound Place, Edinburgh EH1 2LX

Extract

On 18 May 1843, the Established Church of Scotland was broken up by the Disruption, as most of the Evangelical party walked out of the annual meeting of the General Assembly. They left in protest over lay patronage in appointments to church livings and what they perceived as the State's refusal to recognise the Church's spiritual independence. In all over a third of the ministers and perhaps half the lay membership left the establishment. On the day of the Disruption, the prominent Edinburgh Dissenting minister, Dr John Brown of the United Secession Church, Broughton Place, felt called to play a part in the event. Early that afternoon, his biographer related, he was in a peculiarly solemn mood and ‘could not resist the impulse’ to enter the still empty Tanfield Hall where the outgoing ministers were to gather. He took a seat on the platform and waited. In time, the procession of outgoing ministers and elders arrived followed by the immense crowd. As they streamed into the hall, Brown stepped forward to greet them. He was, however, immediately enveloped in the crowd and his gesture passed unnoticed. It was a telling moment. During the past decade, Brown had been one of the most stern and unbending of the Scottish Voluntaries, those who believed that church membership must be entirely voluntary and who opposed in principle the connection of Church and State. A leading campaigner for the disestablishment of the Church of Scotland, Brown had refused to pay the Edinburgh church rate, or Annuity Tax, in highly publicised case of civil disobedience.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cairns, J., Memoir of John Brown, Edinburgh 1869, 198–9Google Scholar.

2 In his opening address as a Moderator of the Free Church General Assembly, Thomas Chalmers proclaimed that the new Church was not Voluntary and would have no fellowship with the Voluntaries: Hanna, W., Memoirs of Dr Chalmers, Edinburgh 18491853, iv. 348Google Scholar.

3 30 03 1838, Hansard's parliamentary debates, 3rd ser. xliii, col. 112Google Scholar.

4 Controversy on establishments’, Eclectic Review 3rd ser. x (07 1833), 70Google Scholar; Halévy, E., A history of the English people 1830–1841, trans. Watkin, E. I., London 1927, 137Google Scholar.

5 Mackie, J. B., Life and work of Duncan McLaren, London 1888, i. 167Google Scholar.

6 Muirhead, I. A., ‘Catholic emancipation: Scottish reactions in 1829’, Innes Review xxiv (1972), 2642Google Scholar; Muirhead, I. A., ‘Catholic emancipation in Scotland: the debate and the aftermath’, Innes Review xxiv (1973), 103–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Ferguson, W., ‘The Reform Act (Scotland) of 1832: intention and effect’, Scottish Historical Review xlv (1966), 105–14Google Scholar.

8 Brent, R., Liberal Anglican politics: Whiggery, religion and reform 1830–1841, Oxford 1987, 65103Google Scholar.

9 Machin, G. I. T., Politics and the Churches in Great Britain 1832 to 1868, Oxford 1977, 114Google Scholar.

10 Brown, C. G., The social history of religion in Scotland since 1730, London 1987, 61–2Google Scholar.

11 Machin, , Politics and the Churches, 114Google Scholar.

12 Eclectic Review 3rd ser. x (07 1833), 71–2Google Scholar.

13 Wardlaw, R., Speech…at the public meeting in Glasgow, for the separation of Church and slate, March 6, 1834, Glasgow 1834, 28Google Scholar.

14 Marshall, A., Ecclesiastical establishments considered: a sermon, preached on the evening of Thursday, 9th April, 1829, in Greyfriars Church, Glasgow, Glasgow 1829Google Scholar.

15 Ibid. 20.

16 Edinburgh Christian Instructor xxviii (08 1829), 569–95Google Scholar; Inglis, J., A vindication of ecclesiastical establishments, Edinburgh 1833Google Scholar; McKerrow, J., History of the Secession Church, Edinburgh 1854, 726–9Google Scholar; Montgomery, A. B., ‘The Voluntary Controversy in the Church of Scotland, 1829–1843’, unpubl. PhD diss. Edinburgh 1953, 939Google Scholar.

17 United Secession Magazine iii (05 1835), 193Google Scholar.

18 Ibid. i (Apr. 1833), 232–3.

19 Voluntary Church Magazine i (09 1833), 320–4Google Scholar.

20 Ibid. 383–8.

21 Scottish Guardian, 29 Mar. 1833.

22 Voluntary Church Magazine i (09 1833), 292–3Google Scholar.

23 McLaren, D., History of the resistance to the Annuity Tax, Edinburgh 1836Google Scholar; Williams, J. C., ‘Edinburgh politics: 1832–1852’, unpubl. PhD diss. Edinburgh 1972, 2630Google Scholar.

24 McLaren, , Annuity Tax, 30Google Scholar.

25 Williams, , ‘Edinburgh polities’, 27–8, 30Google Scholar.

26 Journal of Henry Cockburn, Edinburgh 1874, i. 51Google Scholar.

27 Henry Cockburn to Thomas Chalmers, 22 Apr. 1833, Thomas Chalmers papers, New College Library (hereinafter cited as NCL), CHA4.202.18.

28 Scotsman 22 June, 13, 17 July 1833; Voluntary Church Magazine i (12 1833), 427–34Google Scholar.

29 Machin, , Politics and the Churches, 115Google Scholar.

30 Scotsman, 25 Jan. 1834.

31 See Chalmers's, Thomas speech on the Annuity Tax in the Presbytery of Edinburgh, Scotsman, 25 01 1834Google Scholar; Hanna, , Memoirs of Dr Chalmers, iii. 421–34Google Scholar.

32 Eclectic Review 3rd ser x (07 1833), 70–1Google Scholar; Voluntary Church Magazine i (08 1833), 258–61Google Scholar.

33 Wardlaw, , Speech…for the separation of Church and state, 13Google Scholar.

34 Montgomery, , ‘Voluntary controversy’, 1521Google Scholar; Heugh, H., Considerations on civil establishments of religion, Glasgow 1833, 4062Google Scholar.

35 Ibid. 56.

36 Wardlaw, , Speech…for the separation of Church and state, 1519Google Scholar.

37 Eclectic Review 3rd ser. x (07 1833), 71Google Scholar.

38 Heugh, , Considerations, 25Google Scholar.

39 Marshall, A., Ecclesiastical establishments farther considered, Glasgow 1831, 28–9Google Scholar; Heugh, , Considerations, 3540Google Scholar.

40 Skinner, J., The Scottish endowment question, ecclesiastical and educational, Glasgow 1838, 11Google Scholar.

41 Heugh, , Considerations, 20Google Scholar.

42 Voluntary Church Magazine i (11 1833), 379–84Google Scholar.

43 Wardlaw, , Speech…for the separation of Church and state, 8Google Scholar; Heugh, , Considerations, 811Google Scholar.

44 Voluntary Church Magazine i (10 1833), 338Google Scholar; The Scottish Church Extension scheme’, Eclectic Review n.s. iii (04 1838), 438Google Scholar.

45 Ibid., ii (June 1834), 241.

46 MacGill, H. M., The life of Hugh Heugh, Edinburgh 1852, 255–8Google Scholar; Mackintosh, W. H., Disestablishment and liberation: the movement for the separation of the Anglican Church from state control, London 1972, 57Google Scholar.

47 Eclectic Review n.s. i (09 1833), 321Google Scholar.

48 While there were other factors involved in the creation of the Evangelical party majority in the General Assembly in 1834, including the long-term effects of the Evangelical Revival and the movements towards democratic reform in all institutions, the Voluntary challenge seems to have contributed to the Church's readiness to embrace the comprehensive programme of reforms that Chalmers and the Evangelical leadership had developed during the 1820s and early 1830s: Hanna, , Memoirs of Dr Chalmers, iii. 340–62, 424–49Google Scholar; Brown, S. J., Thomas Chalmers and the godly commonwealth in Scotland, Oxford 1982, 228–36Google Scholar.

49 Cowan, R. M. W., The newspaper in Scotland, Glasgow 1946, 227Google Scholar.

50 Sir Robert Peel to T. Chalmers, 24 Jan. 1835, Peel papers, BL, MS Add. 40411, fo. 200. See also Peel's defence of establishments in his speech in Glasgow in Jan. 1837:Clark, G. Kitson, Peel and the Conservative party, 2nd edn, London 1964, 328–9Google Scholar.

51 Chalmers, T., First report of the Committee of the General Assembly on Church Extension, Edinburgh 1835, 116Google Scholar.

52 Montgomery, , ‘The Voluntary Controversy’, 49Google Scholar.

53 Williams, , ‘Edinburgh politics’, 1719, 150–1Google Scholar; Mackie, , Life and work of Duncan McLaren, i. 170Google Scholar.

54 First annual report of the Scottish Central Board for extending the principle of Voluntary Churches and vindicating the rights of Dissenters, Edinburgh 1835Google Scholar.

55 Black, A., The Church its own enemy, 3rd edn, Edinburgh 1835Google Scholar. See also the review in the Scotsman, 6 May 1835.

56 Edinburgh Voluntary Churchman no. 1 (Aug. 1835), 18.

57 Scotsman, 21 Mar. 1835; speech by Gillon, 3 Apr. 1835, Hansard 3rd ser. xxvii, col. 783.

58 W. Malcolm to T. Chalmers, 8 Apr. 1835, Thomas Chalmers papers, NCL, CHA4.239.75.

59 Rainy, R. and Mackenzie, J., Life of William Cunningham, London 1871, 89Google Scholar.

60 Tait's Edinburgh Magazine n.s. ii. (Oct. 1835), 631–41; Edinburgh Voluntary Churchman no. 3 (Oct. 1835), 71; no. 4 (Nov. 1835), 73–8.

61 D. Aitken to Lord Minto, 25 Sept. 1835, Minto papers, National Library of Scotland [hereinafter cited as NLS], MS 11802, fo. 16.

62 107 1835, Hansard 3rd ser. xxix., cols 136–53Google Scholar.

63 Voluntary Church Magazine iii (09 1835), 385–7Google Scholar.

64 Hanna, , Memoirs of Dr Chalmers, iii. 470–87Google Scholar; Brown, , Thomas Chalmers, 250–3Google Scholar.

65 Edinburgh Voluntary Churchman no. 5 (12 1835), 112–14Google Scholar.

66 Hansard, 3rd ser. xxix, col 139.

67 John Hope to Lord Aberdeen, 24 Aug. 1835, Aberdeen papers, BL, MS Add. 43202, fo. 120.

68 John Hope to Thomas Chalmers, 24 Aug. 1835, Thomas Chalmers papers, NCL, CHA4.237.75.

69 Eclectic Review n.s. iii (Apr. 1838), 456; Skinner, , The Scottish endowment question, 60Google Scholar. For ministers' concerns on this matter see W. McKergo to T. Chalmers, 14 Feb. 1835, Thomas Chalmers papers, NCL, CHA4.239.49; R. Haldane to T. Chalmers, 16 Mar. 1835, ibid. CHA4.237.38.

70 House of Lords, 28 08 1835, Hansard, 3rd ser. xxx, cols 1077–80Google Scholar.

71 R. Buchanan to T. Chalmers, 7 Apr. 1836, Thomas Chalmers papers, NCL, CHA 4.246.61; The work of the Commission, observed David Aitken, had created a ‘lamentable ferment’ in Edinburgh, while in Glasgow, ‘some of my worthy brethren are literally frenzied’: D. Aitken to Lord Minto, 2 Mar. 1836, Minto papers, NLS, MS 11802, fo. 32.

72 D. Aitken to Lord Minto, 30 Jan. 1836, ibid, MS 11802, fo. 26.

73 Edinburgh Voluntary Churchman no. 5 (Dec. 1835), 114.

74 Maciver, I. F., ‘The General Assembly of the Church, the state and society in Scotland: some aspects of their relationships, 1815–1843’, unpubl. MLitt. diss. Edinburgh 1977, 226Google Scholar.

75 Shaw, D., ‘The moderatorship controversy in 1836 and 1837’, Records of the Scottish Church History Society xvii (1972), 115–30Google Scholar; Brown, , Thomas Chalmers, 256–66Google Scholar.

76 Scottish Guardian, 6 June 1837.

77 On their increasing political acumen and subtle campaign against the Royal Commission see H. Renton to D. McLaren, 14 Apr. 1837, F. S. Oliver Papers, NLS, MS 24782, fos 18–19. On the connection with England see Speeches delivered at the great public meeting of the opponents of Church rates in England, and additional endowments in Scotland, held in…Glasgow, 19th January 1837, Glasgow 1837Google Scholar.

78 Cairns, , Memoir of John Brown, 180–94Google Scholar; Haldane, A., The lives of Robert Haldane of Airthrey and of his brother, James Alexander Haldane, 4th edn, Edinburgh 1855, 568–73Google Scholar.

79 Williams, , ‘Edinburgh politics’, 151Google Scholar.

80 Voluntary Church Magazine vi (01 1838), 2334Google Scholar; ibid. (Mar. 1838), 97–106.

81 Hutchison, I. G. C., A political history of Scotland 1832–1924, Edinburgh 1986, 38Google Scholar.

82 Skinner, , The Scottish endowment question, 30Google Scholar.

83 R. Buchanan to T. Chalmers, 10 Mar. 1838, Thomas Chalmers papers, NCL, CHA4.271.33.

84 House of Lords, 30 03 1838, Hansard 3rd ser. xli, cols 110–24Google Scholar.

85 Ibid., cols 124–9, 129.

86 W. Muir to T.Chalmers, 31 Mar. 1838, Thomas Chalmers papers, NCL, CHA4.277.27.

87 See, for example, Gladstone's response in Morley, J., Life of William Ewart Gladstone, 3rd edn, London 1905, i. 169–72Google Scholar; Scotsman, 30 May 1838.

88 Hanna, , Memoirs of Dr Chalmers, iv. 95–6Google Scholar; Watt, H., Thomas Chalmers and the Disruption, Edinburgh 1943, 171–3Google Scholar.

89 Lord Aberdeen to J. Hope, 13 June 1838, Aberdeen papers, BL, MS Add. 43202, fos 179–80.

90 D. Aitken to Lord Minto, 24 May 1838, Minto papers, NLS, MS 11802, fo. 106.

91 Voluntary Church Magazine vi (07 1838), 293Google Scholar.

92 Scotsman, 2 June 1838; Brown, , Thomas Chalmers, 273–5Google Scholar.

93 MacGill, , Life of Hugh Heugh, 321–2;Google ScholarVoluntary Church Magazine vi (11 1838), 505–10Google Scholar.

94 Scotsman, 8 June 1839. See also Voluntary Church Magazine vii (04 1839), 181Google Scholar.

95 J. Hope to Lord Aberdeen, 12 Jan. 1841, Peel papers, BL, MS Add. 40312, fos 350–61; J. Hope to Sir R. Peel, 16 Jan. 1841, ibid. 40429, fos 28–9.

96 Hutchison, , A political history of Scotland, 42Google Scholar; Williams, , ‘Edinburgh politics’, 161–70Google Scholar.

97 Despite prolonged agitation through the mid Victorian years, the Annuity Tax in Edinburgh would not be abolished until 1870: Mackie, , Life and work of Duncan McLaren, i. 178210. For the revived disestablishment campaign see especiallyGoogle ScholarMachin, G. I. T., Politics and the Churches in Great Britain 1869–1921, Oxford 1987, 87119, 145–74Google Scholar.