British Journal of Political Science - Current Issue

Volume 38 Issue 02

Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:00:00 GMT

British Journal of Political Science, Volume 38 Issue 02

The British Journal of Political Science is a broadly based journal aiming to cover developments across a wide range of countries and specialisms. Contributions are drawn from all fields of political science (including political theory, political behaviour, public policy and international relations), and articles from scholars in related disciplines (sociology, social psychology, economics and philosophy) appear frequently. With a reputation established over 30 years of publication, the British Journal of Political Science is widely recognised as one of the premier journals in its field.

The Politics of When: Redistribution, Investment and Policy Making for the Long Term

Research Articles
ALAN M. JACOBS,
British Journal of Political Science, Volume 38 Issue 02 , pp 193-220

Abstract
Why do some elected governments impose short-term costs to invest in solving long-term social problems while others delay or merely redistribute the pain? This article addresses that question by examining the politics of pension reform in Britain and the United States. It first reframes the conventional view of the outcomes centred on cross-sectional distribution demonstrating that the politicians who enacted the least radical redistribution enacted the most dramatic intertemporal tradeoffs. To explain this pattern, the article develops and tests a theory of policy choice in which organized interests struggle for long-term advantage under institutional constraints. The argument points to major analytical advantages to studying governments policy choices in intertemporal terms, for both the identification of comparative puzzles and their explanation.

Political Competition and Democratic Stability in New Democracies

Research Articles
JOSEPH WRIGHT,
British Journal of Political Science, Volume 38 Issue 02 , pp 221-245

Abstract
This article examines the way in which the initial level of political competition in a new democracy affects the stability of that regime. The author argues that new democracies with low levels of initial political competition are more likely to fail because those initially excluded from the democratic game seek to subvert the regime in the future. Using data from ninety-two new democracies born since 1946, he finds that a higher level of initial political competition in a new democracy makes for a more durable democracy. New democracies at war and born during the Cold War are less likely to survive. Finally, he finds evidence that new democracies with low levels of initial political competition are also more likely to meet with civil conflict.

New Forms of Political Participation: Searching for Expert Citizens and Everyday Makers

Research Articles
YAOJUN LI, DAVID MARSH,
British Journal of Political Science, Volume 38 Issue 02 , pp 247-272

Abstract
Declining political participation has caused much concern among political scientists and politicians. This article builds upon Henrik Bang s conceptualization of Expert Citizens and Everyday Makers as new forms of political participation. Using the 2001 Home Office Citizenship Survey, we identify four types of political participant: Political Activists, Expert Citizens, Everyday Makers and Non-Participants. We assess the socio-demographic and cultural factors underlying these different types of participant. We then move on to explore the association between the types of political participation and two domains of political beliefs/actions: political trust and efficacy; and political contacting and voice. Our analysis shows significant differences between the types of participant in the two domains under investigation and thus lends support to our development of Bang s conceptualization of new forms of political participation as useful tools in empirical research.

Emanating Political Participation: Untangling the Spatial Structure Behind Participation

Research Articles
WENDY K TAM CHO, THOMAS J RUDOLPH,
British Journal of Political Science, Volume 38 Issue 02 , pp 273-289

Abstract
This is an analysis of the spatial structure of political participation in the United States using spatial econometric techniques and newly available geo-coded data. The results provide strong evidence that political participation is geographically clustered, and that this clustering cannot be explained entirely by social network involvement, individual-level characteristics, such as race, income, education, cognitive forms of political engagement, or by aggregate-level factors such as racial diversity, income inequality, mobilization or mean education level. The analysis suggests that the spatial structure of participation is consistent with a diffusion process that occurs independently from citizens' involvement in social networks.

Political Interest, Cognitive Ability and Personality: Determinants of Voter Turnout in Britain

Research Articles
KEVIN DENNY, ORLA DOYLE,
British Journal of Political Science, Volume 38 Issue 02 , pp 291-310

Abstract
This article uses longitudinal data from the National Child Development Study (NCDS) to investigate the determinants of voter turnout in the 1997 British general election. It introduces measures of cognitive ability and personality into the participation literature and finds that they are significant determinants of turnout. It also shows that standard turnout models may be biased by the inclusion of the much used interest in politics measure. A bivariate probit model of turnout and political interest finds that individuals with high comprehension ability and an aggressive personality are more likely to both turn out to vote and have an interest in politics.

Political Efficacy and Participation in Twenty-Seven Democracies: How Electoral Systems Shape Political Behaviour

Research Articles
JEFFREY A KARP, SUSAN A BANDUCCI,
British Journal of Political Science, Volume 38 Issue 02 , pp 311-334

Abstract
Advocates of proportional representation (PR) often cite its potential for increasing citizen involvement in politics as one of PR s fundamental advantages over plurality or first-past-the-post systems. The assumption is that plurality electoral systems distort the translation of votes into seats, discouraging and alienating small party supporters and other political minorities. In contrast, PR systems are believed to provide greater opportunities for representation which are assumed to instil greater efficacy and increase participation. We examine this theory linking institutions to electoral participation across a diverse set of countries using data from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. Using a multi-level approach we find evidence consistent with the expectations about the negative influence of disproportional systems on political minorities. Voters are also likely to have stronger partisan preferences in PR systems, which enhances political efficacy and increases voter participation. The effects of PR, however, are not all positive; broad coalitions, which are likely to be a feature of these systems, reduce political efficacy.

A Framework for the Study of Personality and Political Behaviour

Research Articles
JEFFERY J MONDAK, KAREN D HALPERIN,
British Journal of Political Science, Volume 38 Issue 02 , pp 335-362

Abstract
Variance in how citizens interact with the political world constitutes one of many classes of individual difference. Understanding the antecedents of this variance is the central objective for students of political behaviour, and researchers draw on numerous factors in addressing this task. Unfortunately, one potentially vital factor, personality, has received only sporadic attention in recent decades. Neglect of personality was understandable for many years, as psychological research on personality failed to produce concise taxonomies applicable to the study of politics. As the present analysis demonstrates, however, this situation has changed. Research on personality has gained new footing with the emergence of a series of five-factor models, and these frameworks hold great potential for the study of political behaviour. This thesis is advanced in a two-part analysis. First, we outline how and why our understanding of citizen politics may be improved through application of five-factor models of personality. In doing so, we focus on the components of one specific taxonomy, the Big Five lexical model. Secondly, using three datasets, we explore the link between the Big Five personality factors and a wide array of political attitudes and behaviours. Results reveal that all facets of personality captured by the Big Five framework matter for citizen politics, and that personality effects operate on virtually all aspects of political behaviour. These findings demonstrate the insight that can emerge with further application of broad-scale models of personality.

Recent Economic Perspectives on Political Economy, Part I

Review Articles
TORUN DEWAN, KENNETH A SHEPSLE,
British Journal of Political Science, Volume 38 Issue 02 , pp 363-382

Abstract
In recent years some of the best theoretical work on the political economy of political institutions and processes has begun surfacing outside the political science mainstream in high quality economics journals. This two-part article surveys these contributions from a recent five-year period. In Part I, the focus is on elections, voting and information aggregation, followed by treatments of parties, candidates and coalitions. In Part II, papers on economic performance and redistribution, constitutional design, and incentives, institutions, and the quality of political elites are discussed. Part II concludes with a discussion of the methodological bases common to economics and political science, the way economists have used political science research, and some new themes and arbitrage opportunities.