Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:58:25.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conductivity measurement of individual SnS nanoparticles by Peak Force AFM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2013

C. Prastani
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, Faculty of Science, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science-Physics of Devices, High Tech Campus 5, 5656 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands
A. Vetushka
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Cukrovarnicka 10, 162 53 Praha 6, Czech Republic
M. Hývl
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Cukrovarnicka 10, 162 53 Praha 6, Czech Republic
A. Fejfar
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Cukrovarnicka 10, 162 53 Praha 6, Czech Republic
M. Nanu
Affiliation:
Thin Film Factory B.V., Hemma Oddastrjitte 5, 8927 AA Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
D. Nanu
Affiliation:
Thin Film Factory B.V., Hemma Oddastrjitte 5, 8927 AA Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
R. E. I. Schropp
Affiliation:
Energy Research Center of the Netherlands (ECN), Solar Energy, High Tech Campus Building 5, p-057 (WAY), 5656 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands.Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e), Department of Applied Physics, Plasma & Materials Processing, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
J. K. Rath
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, Faculty of Science, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science-Physics of Devices, High Tech Campus 5, 5656 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

Peak Force Atomic Force Microscope is a new technique to characterize fragile materials such as nanoparticles with high accuracy with only one measurement. Unlike the tapping mode AFM, Peak Force AFM operates at a frequency below the resonant frequency of the cantilever. This allows for a direct control of the forces and avoids lateral forces that may damage the sample as in contact mode AFM. Furthermore, the performance characteristics of Peak Force AFM are suitable to work also in Tunneling AFM (TUNA) mode, enabling the study of the electrical properties of materials.

In this work SnS nanoparticles capped with tri-n-octylphosphine oxide (TOPO) have been characterized. By means of Peak Force AFM it is possible to measure simultaneously topography and current maps of nanoparticles, yielding information about the shape, size and the conductivity of even a single nanoparticle. The topography map clearly showed single nanoparticles with a size less than 5 nm and spherical shape. In the conductivity map it is possible to discern the same nanoparticles, the correlation with the topography map is evident. This confirms the conduction (though not calibrated) of SnS nanoparticles. This type of measurements has been repeated many times in order to check the reproducibility of this technique. Moreover, the same nanoparticles have been measured also by Torsional Resonant TUNA AFM in order to compare it with Peak Force AFM. By means of TR-TUNA it was possible to measure the topography of SnS nanoparticles capped with TOPO but not the current. Besides, the resolution of the topography map acquired by TR-TUNA AFM is inferior to Peak Force AFM. From this comparison it has been found that the conductivity of nanoparticles, even if they are capped with TOPO, can be measured by Peak Force AFM, a result that thus far has been difficult to achieve by other types of AFM.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gupta, A.K., Gupta, M., Biomaterials 26, 39954021 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, P. K., Lee, K.S., El-Sayed, I.H., and El-Sayed, M.A., J. Phys. Chem. B 110 72387248 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poizot, P., Laruelle, S., Grugeon, S., Dupont, L. & Tarascon, J-M., Nature 407, 496499 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W., Hu, J., Zheng, Y., Zhong, L., Song, W., and Wan, L., Adv. Mater. 20, 11601165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokkapati, S., Beck, F. J., Polman, A. and Catchpole, K. R., Applied Physics Letters 95, 053115 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afzaal, M. and O’Brien, P., J. Mater. Chem 16, 15971602 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, D., Watt, G.D., Harb, J. N., and Davis, R.C., Nano Lett 5, 571577 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, S., Tang, Z., Liang, X. and Kotov, N.A., Nano Lett., 4, 16371641(2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Wolf, P., Brazel, E. and Erickson, A., Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing 4, 71 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C., Minne, S., Pittenger, B., Mednick, A., Guide, M., and Nguyen, T.-Q., in Bruker Application Note AN132 (Bruker Co., Santa Barbara, 2011)Google Scholar
Zhong, Q., Innis, , Kjoller, D., Elings, V., Surface Sci. Lett. 290, L688 (1993)Google Scholar
Huang, L., Su, C., Ultramicroscopy 100, 277 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P., Huang, L., and Su, C., Bruker application note AN107, Rev. A0 (2007)Google Scholar
Yang, C. and Hwang, I., Nanotechnology 21, 065710 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prastani, C., Vetushka, A., Fejfar, A., Nanu, M., Nanu, D., Rath, J.K., and Schropp, R.E.I., Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 083107 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
.Kaemmer, Stefan B, Bruker Application note 133 (2011)Google Scholar
Prastani, C., Nanu, M., Nanu, D., Rath, J.K., and Schroppl, R.E.I., Material Science and Engineering B (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2012.10.019 Google Scholar
Stiévenard, D. and Legrand, B., Prog. Surf. Sci. 81, 112 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetushka, A., Fejfar, A., Ledinský, M., Rezek, B., Stuchlík, J., Kočka, J., Physical Review B 81, 237301 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar