Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:52:06.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Misoriented Epitaxial Growth of (111)CoSi 2 on Offset (111)Si Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Gang Bai
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
David N. Jamieson
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
Marc-A. Nicolet
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
Thad Vreeland Jr
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
Get access

Abstract

Single crystal epitaxial films of CoSi2 were grown by MBE on various (111)Si single crystal substrates, whose surfaces were purposely tilted towards the < 110>>g, direction by small angles ϕg,†, 0°, ≤ϕg, ≤, 4° measured between the surface normal and the < 111>>g, direction of Si. The actual offset angle, .ϕ8,, was determined by back Laue reflection method. The average perpendicular strain of the CoSi2 epilayer, ε, and the < 111 >f orientation of the epitaxial CoSi2 film were determined by double crystal diffractometry. We find that the misorientation angle, a, measured between the Si < 111>g, and CoSi2 < 111>f directions, increases linearly with the offset angle, ϕg, up to ϕg, = 4°. A simple geometrical model is developed which predicts that α = ε┵ × tan ϕg,. The model agrees quantitatively with the experimental data. The equivalent strain energy associated with the misorientation is approximated by that of a low angle tilt boundary. The misorientation angle α of the equilibrium state, determined by minimizing the total strain energy of the epitaxial film, is nonzero in general.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Cherns, D., Smith, D.A., Krakow, W., and Batson, P.E., Phil.Mag., A45, 107(1982)Google Scholar
[2]Tung, R.T., Poate, J.M., Bean, J.C., Gibson, J.M., and Jacobson, D.C., Thin Solid Films, 93, 77(1982)Google Scholar
[3]Tung, R.T., Gibson, J.M., and Poate, J.M., Phys.Rev.Lett., 50, 429(1983)Google Scholar
[4]Tung, R.T., Gibson, J.M., and Poate, J.M., Appl.Phys.Lett., 42, 888(1983)Google Scholar
[5]Phaneuf, R.J., and Williams, E.D., to appear in Phys.Rev.Lett.Google Scholar
[6]Gibson, J.M., Tung, R.T., and Poate, J.M., Mat.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc., Vol.25(1984)Google Scholar
[7] For example, see van der Merwe, J.H., J.Appl.Phys., 34, 117,127(1963)Google Scholar
[8]Dodson, B.W., and Tsao, J.Y., Appl.Phys.Lett., 51, 26(1987)Google Scholar
[9] For example, see reference [1],Google Scholar
[10]Read, W.T., and Shockley, W., Phys.Rev., 78, 275(1959)Google Scholar
[11] For example, see Matthews, J.W., Epitaxial Growth, PartB, ed. Mattews, J.W., Academic Press(1975)Google Scholar