Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T16:15:05.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deformation-Dissolution Potential of Bedded Salt, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Site, Delaware Basin, New Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Roger Y. Anderson
Roger Y. Anderson*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
Get access

Extract

Deep-seated collapse and brecciation is a feature common to bedded salt in a number of evaporite basins. The origin of these features is poorly understood. The relatively young geologic age of uplift and exposure of evaporites in the Delaware Basin, and a still-active hydrologic system, provides a unique opportunity to examine the pathways of water movement related to collapse features and salt dissolution. In addition, salt deformation structures are closely associated with brine, dissolution, and collapse. This report briefly discusses evidence for deep-seated dissolution,considers the relationship between deformation, dissolution, and brine, and examines the potential for dissolution at the WIPP (Waste Isolation Pilot Plant) site with respect to stages in the deformation-dissolution process.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 11: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management V , 1981 , 449
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Anderson, R. Y. (1981) New Mexico Geol. Soc., Special Publ. 10; pp. 133–145.Google Scholar
2. Vine, J. D. (1970) American Assoc. Petroleum Geologists, Bull., 44, pp. 1903–1911.Google Scholar
3. Anderson, R. Y. and Kirkland, D. W. (1980) Geology 8, pp. 66–69.10.1130/0091-7613(1980)8<66:DOSDBB>2.0.CO;22.0.CO;2>CrossRef2.0.CO;2>Google Scholar
4. Rezak, R. and Bright, T. S. (1981) Geo-Marine Letters, 1, pp. 97–103.10.1007/BF02463325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Hiss, W. L. (1975) Univ. Colorado, Ph.D. Dissertation, pp. 1–396.Google Scholar
6. Hiss, W. L. (1976) New Mexico Bur. Mines & Mineral Resources, Map 7.Google Scholar
7. Anderson, R. Y. and Powers, D. W. (1978) New Mexico Bur. Mines and Mineral Resources, Circular 159, pp 79–83.Google Scholar
8. Register, J. K. (1981) U. S. Dept. of Energy. TME 3080, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
9. Hubbert, W. K. and Rubey, W. W. (1959) Geol. Soc. America, Bull. 70, pp. 115–166.10.1130/0016-7606(1959)70[115:ROFPIM]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Lambert, S. J. (1978) New Mexico Bur. Mines, Circular 159, pp. 33–38.Google Scholar
11. Gussow, W. C. (1968) American Assoc. Petroleum Geologists, Mem. 8, pp. 16–52.Google Scholar
12. Talbot, C. J. (1980) Geologica Ultraiectina, Rijksuniversiteit, Utrecht, Special Publ. 1, Geology and Nuclear Waste Disposal, pp. 53–67.Google Scholar
13. Talbot, C. J. (1982) Personal conmunication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Ode, H. (1968) Geol. Soc. America, Special Paper 88, pp. 543–595.Google Scholar
15. Powers, D. W. Lambert, S. J. Shaffer, S. E. Hill, L. R. and Weart, W. D. (1978) Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, SAND 78-1696, 1.Google Scholar