Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T01:27:41.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconsidering the syntax of non-canonical negative inversion1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2010

JESSICA WHITE-SUSTAITA
JESSICA WHITE-SUSTAITA*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, The University of Texas at Austin, Calhoun 501, B5100, Austin, Texas 78712, USAjessicawhite@mail.utexas.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two main hypotheses have been proposed to account for the word order of negative inversion (NI) in varieties of non-canonical English (e.g. Don't nobody else care). An auxiliary inversion analysis argues that the word order is derived via movement of the auxiliary to the left periphery, whereas an existential analysis argues that the word order is an artifact of deletion of the expletive subject, paralleling there-insertion existential constructions. After reviewing these hypotheses, I provide empirical evidence that neither of these theories adequately explains the peculiarities of NI. I advance a third hypothesis, namely that NI is the result of negative movement to the specifier of NegP, and that this movement is pragmatically motivated by an existential meaning in NI constructions. Syntactically, NI is made possible through the Neg-Criterion (Haegeman & Zanuttini 1991, 1996). This analysis explains problems encountered by prior analyses, and offers a unified analysis for variation in NI across dialects. Finally, I explain cross-dialectal differences in NI by considering the relationship between subject requirements and agreement.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , November 2010 , pp. 429 - 455
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aissen, Judith. 1999. Markedness and subject choice in Optimality Theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 17 (4), 673–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 1998. Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16 (3), 491–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Maynor, Natalie & Cukor-Avila, Patricia. 1991. The emergence of Black English: Text and commentary. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbiers, Sjef. 2009. Locus and limits of syntactic microvariation. Lingua 119 (11), 1607–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaver, David, Francez, Itamar & Levinson, Dmitry. 2005. Bad subject: (Non-) Canonicality and NP distribution in existentials. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory XV. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonas D. & Jonas, Diane. 1996. Subject positions and the roles of TP. Linguistic Inquiry, 195–236.Google Scholar
Chesnutt, Charles & Sollors, Werner. 2002. Charles W. Chesnutt: Stories, novels & essays. New York: Library of America.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Christian, Donna. 1984. Variation and change in geographically isolated communities: Appalachian English and Ozark English. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Cukor-Avila, Patricia. 2003. The complex grammatical history of African-American and white vernaculars in the South. In Nagle, Stephen & Sanders, Sara L. (eds.), English in the Southern United States, 82–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter. 1993. Topicalization, inversion, and complementizers in English. MS, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Deprez, Viviane. 1997. A non-unified analysis of negative concord. In Forget, Daniel (ed.), Negation and polarity: Syntax and semantics. Selected papers from the Colloquium Negation: Syntax and Semantics, Ottawa, 11–13 May 1995. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68 (1), 81–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feagin, Crawford. 1979. Variation and change in Alabama English: A sociolinguistic study of the white community. Washington, DC: Georgetown University School of Language.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2000. Negative . . . concord? Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 18 (3), 457–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Lisa. 1998. Aspect and predicate phrases in African-American Vernacular English. In Bailey, Guy, Baugh, John, Mufwene, Salikoko & Rickford, John (eds.), African-American English: Structure, history, and use, 37–68. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Green, Lisa. 2000. Aspectual be-type constructions and coercion in African American English. Natural Language Semantics 8, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Lisa. 2001. Negative inversion. MS, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Green, Lisa. 2002a. African American English: A linguistic introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Lisa. 2002b. Negative concord and negative inversion in African American English. MS, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Green, Lisa. 2006. Negative inversion. Presentation, University of Texas at Austin, 17 April.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements, In Greenberg, Joseph (ed.), Universals of language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2000a. Negative preposing, negative inversion, and the split CP. In Horn, Laurence R. & Kato, Yasuhiko (eds.), Negation and polarity: Syntactic and semantic perspectives, 21–61. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2000b. Inversion, non-adjacent inversion and adjuncts in CP. Transactions of the Philological Society 98 (1), 121–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Lohndal, Terje. 2010. Negative concord and (multiple) agree: A case study of West Flemish. Linguistic Inquiry 41 (2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Zanuttini, Rafaela. 1991. Negative heads and the Neg Criterion. The Linguistic Review 8, 233–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Zanuttini, Rafaela. 1996. Negative concord in West Flemish. In Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi (eds.), Parameters and functional heads: Essays in comparative syntax, 117–80. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John. 2002. Systematization and the origin of rules: The case of subject-verb inversion in questions. Studies in Language 26 (3), 573–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, Alison. 1995. Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect variation and parameter setting. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, Alison, MacLaren, R., Wilson, J. & Finlay, C.. 1997. The acquisition of negative concord in non-standard English. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Herburger, Elena. 2001. The negative concord puzzle revisited. Natural Language Semantics 9 (3), 289–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingham, Richard. 2000. Negation and OV order in late Middle English. Journal of Linguistics 36 (1), 13–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingham, Richard. 2003. Negated subjects and objects in 15th-century nonliterary English. Language Variation and Change 14 (3), 291–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo & Safir, Kenneth. 1989. The null subject parameter (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Negative attraction and negative concord in English grammar. Language, 773–818.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Cohen, Paul, Robins, Clarence & Lewis, John. 1968. A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City, 2 vols. Philadelphia: US Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Martin, Stephen. 1992. Topics in the syntax of nonstandard English. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary. 1974. Existential sentences in English. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Michael & Hall, Joseph S.. 2004. Dictionary of Smoky Mountain English. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Parrott, Jeffrey. 2000. Negative inversion in African American Vernacular English: A case of optional movement? In Antrim, Nancy Mae, Goodall, Grant, Schulte-Nafeh, Martha & Samiian, Vida (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Western Conference on Linguistics, vol. 11 (WECOL 1999). Fresno, CA: California State University, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20 (3), 365–424.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana & Tagliamonte, Sali. 1994. -S or nothing: Marking the plural in the African-American diaspora. American Speech 69, 227–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John & Rickford, Russell. 2000. Spoken soul: The story of Black English. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 1989. American earlier Black English: Morphological and syntactic variables. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Sells, Peter, Rickford, John & Wasow, Tom. 1996. An optimality theoretic approach to variation in negative inversion in AAVE. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 14 (3), 591–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Dixon, R. M. (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112–71. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer. 2002. Negative concord in the Old and New World: Evidence from Scotland. Language Variation and Change 13 (2), 109–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speas, Margaret. 1995. Economy, agreement and the representation of null arguments. MS, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Weldon, Tracey. 1994. An HPSG account of negative inversion in African-American Vernacular English. MS, Ohio State University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walter & Christian, Donna. 1976. Appalachian speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susan. 1999. Modal verbs must be raising verbs. In Bird, Sonya, Carnie, Andrew, Haugen, Jason D. & Norquest, Peter (eds.), Proceedings of the 18th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 599–612. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2004. Sentential negation and negative concord. PhD dissertation, University of the Netherlands.Google Scholar