Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T15:00:57.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Risk perception and risk attitude in informed consent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2002

ALAN SCHWARTZ
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Education (mc 591), 808 S. Wood St., 986 CME, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. Email: Internet to alansz@uic.edu.
MEMOONA HASNAIN
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA
Get access

Abstract

The standard account of the ‘reflection effect’ (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979) is that attitude toward risk changes across gain or loss framings of outcomes. Weber and Bottom (1989) proposed an alternative account in which decision makers have stable risk attitudes, but changing risk perceptions. Undergraduates were randomly assigned to read one of three hypothetical informed consent documents from a trial of a cholesterol-lowering drug. Documents used gain, loss or both framings to describe expected benefits. Respondents rated riskiness of participation and non-participation in the trial and made a choice about whether they would participate in the trial.

The reflection effect was replicated. In addition, as predicted by the Weber and Bottom account, respondents in the gain condition were more likely to rate participation as riskier than non-participation compared to respondents in the loss condition, and in each condition more than 70 per cent of respondents chose to avoid the option they judged as riskier. Implications for informed consent are discussed.

Type
Technical Paper
Copyright
© Risk Decision and Policy, 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)