Cambridge Journals Online

Cambridge Journals Online
Skip to content
Environment and Development Economics (2004), 9 : 135-154 Cambridge University Press
Copyright © 2004 Cambridge University Press
doi:10.1017/S1355770X03001219
Published online by Cambridge University Press 02 Apr 2004
Environment and Development Economics (2004), 9:2:135-154 Cambridge University Press
Copyright © 2004 Cambridge University Press
doi:10.1017/S1355770X03001219

Household welfare and forest dependence in Southern Malawi


MONICA FISHER a1 1
a1 Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Oregon State University, 213 Ballard Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA. E-mail: fisherm@oregonstate.edu

Article author query
fisher m   [Google Scholar
 

Abstract

This paper examines the role forests play in alleviating poverty in rural Malawi. Data from three villages in southern Malawi indicate high levels of forest dependence. Gini decomposition shows that access to forest income reduced measured income inequality at the study sites. Tobit analysis of the determinants of reliance on low-return and high-return forest activities indicates that asset-poor households are more reliant on forest activities compared with the better off; reliance on high-return activities is conditioned also by availability of adult male labor and location. Taken together, the study's findings suggest that forests prevent poverty by supplementing income, and may also help to improve the living standards of households that are able to enter into high-return forest occupations. Policy implications are discussed.



Footnotes

1 I thank Duncan Chikwita, Busiso Chilambo, G.T.N. Kathindwa, R.J. Kaphesi, the late S.A.R. Mjathu, and colleagues at the Likhubula Forestry Office and University of Malawi's Centre for Social Research for excellent advice and research assistance during fieldwork in Malawi. Special thanks are due to the respondents who generously participated in the household survey. I thank Gerald Shively and three anonymous reviewers for very useful comments on an earlier version of the paper. This research was supported by a Fulbright grant.



back to top
Cambridge University Press