Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:14:38.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some patterns of linguistic diffusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Guy Bailey ,
Tom Wikle ,
Jan Tillery  and
Lori Sand
Guy Bailey
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University
Tom Wikle
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University
Jan Tillery
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University
Lori Sand
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although variationists have explored the diffusion of linguistic changes from one social group to another and from one linguistic environment to another in some detail, they have done much less work on the spatial diffusion of changes. In fact, Trudgill's (1974, 1975) use of Hagerstrand's gravity model to explain in hierarchical diffusion of innovations in East Anglia and Norway was the only systematic account of spatial diffusion in the literature. This article uses data from the random sample telephone survey portion of a Survey of Oklahoma Dialects (SOD) to explore the spatial diffusion of linguistic innovations in Oklahoma. It analyzes that data using a variety of techniques of computer cartography and the General Linear Models procedure in SAS. The data clearly show that, whereas some linguistic innovations diffuse hierarchically (as linguists have long contended), others diffuse contrahierarchically, while still others diffuse in complex patterns that show characteristics of both contagious and hierarchical diffusion. An analysis of the barriers to and amplifiers of diffusion suggests that these different types of diffusion are a consequence of the different social meanings that linguistic forms carry.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , October 1993 , pp. 359 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, Guy, & Bernstein, Cynthia. (1989). Methodology for a phonological survey of Texas. Journal of English Linguistics 22:6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Guy, & Cukor-Avila, Patricia. (1992, 04). The acquisition of a vernacular. Paper presented at the Southeastern Conference on Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy, & Dyer, Margie. (1992). An approach to sampling in dialectology. American speech 67:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Guy, & Maynor, Natalie. (1987). Decreolization? Language in Society 16:449–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Guy, & Maynor, Natalie. (1989). The divergence controversy. American Speech 64:12–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Maynor, Natalie, & Cukor-Avila, Patricia. (1989). Variation in subject-verb concord in Early Modern English. Language Variation and Change 1:285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Guy, & Thomas, Erik. (in press). Monophthongal /ai/ before voiceless obstruents in Texas. In Montgomery, Michael (ed.), Studies in honor of Lee Pederson. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy, & Tillery, Jan. (forthcoming). The evolution of fixin to and multiple modals in Southern American English. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Wikle, Tom, & Sand, Lori. (1991). The focus of linguistic innovation in Texas. English World-Wide 12:195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Wikle, Tom, Tillery, Jan, & Sand, Lori. (1991). The apparent time construct. Language Variation and Changes 3:241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Wikle, Tom, Tillery, Jan, & Sand, Lori. (in press). Methodology for a survey of Oklahoma dialects. In Moder, Carol (ed.), Proceedings of the 1991 Mid-America Conference on Linguistics. Stillwater: Oklahoma State University, English Department.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Cynthia. (1993). Measuring social causes of phonological variables. American Speech 68:227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. (1933). Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Brown, Vivian. (1991). Evolution of the merger of /i/ and / ε/ before nasals in Tennessee. American Speech 66:303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callary, Robert. (1975). Phonological change and the development of an urban dialect in Illinois. Language in Society 4:155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, Timothy C. (1983). Sound change and social structure in a rural community. Language in Society 12:313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagerstrand, T. (1952). The propagation of innovation waves, Lund, Sweden: Lund Studies in Geography B No. 44.Google Scholar
Haggett, P. (1979). Geography: A modern synthesis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Haynes, K. E., & Fortherinham, A. S. (1984). Gravity and spatial interaction models. Newberry Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Herrold, Ruth. (1990). Mechanisms of merger: The implementation and distribution of the low-back merger in Eastern Pennsylvania. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Herzog, Marvin I. (1695). The Yiddish language in northern Poland: Its geography and history. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Houston, Ann. (1985). Continuity and change in English morphology: The variable (ING). Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony S. (1989). Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1:199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurath, Hans. (1949). Word geography of the eastern United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19:217–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1991). The three dialects of English. In Eckert, Penelope (ed.), New ways of analyzing sound change. New York: Academic. 1–44.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Cohen, Paul, Robins, Clarence, & Lewis, John. (1968). A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New york City. 2 vols. (U.S. Office of Education Final Report, Cooperative Research Project No. 3288.) Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Yaeger, Malcah, & Steiner, Richard. (1972). A quantitative study of sound change in progress. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. (1980). Language and social networks. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Moulton, William. (1962). Dialect geography and the concept of phonological space. Word 18:23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pederson, Lee, McDaniel, Susan, & Adams, Carol. (1990). Linguistic atlas of the Gulf States, volume 4: Regional Matrix. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Pederson, Lee, McDaniel, Susan, & Adams, Carol. (1991). Linguistic atlas of the Gulf States, volume 5: Regional pattern. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. E. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik, & Bailey, Guy. (1993, 04). The evolution of some Southern vowel systems. Paper presented at the Southeastern Conference on Linguistics.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey, & Kaufman, Terrence. (1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillery, Jan. (1989). The merger of the phonemes /ɔ/ and /α/ in Texas: A study of sociological and phonetic constraints. Master's thesis, Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
Tillery, Jan. (1990, 12). Spatial diffusion and sociolinguistic structure. Paper presented at the Modern Language Association.Google Scholar
Tillery, Jan. (1992). The locus of linguistic variation in Oklahoma. Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1974). Linguistic change and diffusion: Description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography. Language is society 3:215–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1975). Linguistic geography and geographical linguistics. In Board, C., et al. (eds.), Progress in geography (vol. 8). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Wyld, Henry C. (1920). A history of Modern colloquial English. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar