Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T04:43:25.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anti-, non-, or post-Saidian?: The challenge of discussing German Orientalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

Malte Fuhrmann*
Affiliation:
Orient-lnstitut İstanbul, Susam Sok, 16-18/8, TR-34433 Cihangir-İstanbul, Turkey, fuhrmann@oidmg.org

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berman, Nina. Orientalismus, Kolonialismus und Moderne: Zum Bild des Orients in der deutschsprachigen Kuttur um 1900. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1996.Google Scholar
Federal Archives — Military Archive, Freiburg i. Br., Imperial Navy Series; ΒΑ-MA RM 40/214.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer ed. “German Orientalism.” Special issue, Comparative Studies on Africa, South Asia and the Middle East 24, no. 2 (2004).Google Scholar
Kontje, Todd Curtis. German Orientalisms. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öztürk, Ali Osman. Alman Oryantalizmi: 19. Yüzyıl Alman Kültüründe Türk Motifi. Ankara: Vadi, 2000.Google Scholar
Said, Edward. Orientalism. New York: Vintage, 1978.Google Scholar