Cambridge Journals Online

Cambridge Journals Online
Skip to content
The Historical Journal (2007), 50 : 49-72 Cambridge University Press
Copyright © 2007 Cambridge University Press
doi:10.1017/S0018246X06005917
Published online by Cambridge University Press 13 Feb 2007


THE BRITISH STATE AND THE ANGLO-FRENCH WARS OVER ANTIQUITIES, 1798–1858 1


HOLGER HOOCK a1c1
a1 University of Liverpool

Article author query
hoock h   [Google Scholar
 

Abstract

This article seeks to contribute to a revisionist account of the role of the British state and the nation in building the British Museum's early antique collections. Traditionally, there has been a perception that, in contrast especially to France, the British national collections of antiquities were formed primarily by private individuals donating objects, while the state looked on with indifference, or, at best, occasionally bought antiquities on the cheap from enterprising travellers or diplomats. Yet, the scale and quality of the British Museum's collections owe much to the power and reach of the British military and imperial state. The harnessing of political, diplomatic, and military resources to archaeological work, the dovetailing of private and public efforts, and a strong element of international, especially Anglo-French, competition added up to a substantial programme of public patronage. This is easily ignored by approaches that only consider (continental European) ideal types of public patronage, such as Napoleon's Egyptian Commission on the Sciences and Arts. The article sketches the chronological and geographical unfolding of state-supported archaeological activities around the Mediterranean and the Near East, and considers the connections between archaeology and diplomacy, the different modes of collection building, and the origins of debates about preservation and spoliation.

(Published Online February 13 2007)


Correspondence:
c1 School of History, University of Liverpool, 9 Abercromby Square, Liverpool, L69 7WZ H.Hoock@liverpool.ac.uk


Footnotes

1 I thank Ulrich Gotter, Frances Macmillan, Peter Mandler, Graham Oliver, Hannah Smith, two anonymous reviewers for the Historical Journal, and participants in a Modern British Political History Seminar at Cambridge in May 2005 for their kindness in offering constructive advice on earlier versions.



back to top
Cambridge University Press