Cambridge Journals Online

Cambridge Journals Online
Skip to content
Experimental Agriculture (2002), 38 : 411-431 Cambridge University Press
Copyright © 2002 Cambridge University Press
doi:10.1017/S0014479702000443
Published online by Cambridge University Press 16 Dec 2002


FARMER AND RESEARCHER PARTNERSHIPS IN MALAWI: DEVELOPING SOIL FERTILITY TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE NEAR-TERM AND FAR-TERM


S. Snapp a1c1, G. Kanyama-Phiri a2, B. Kamanga a2, R. Gilbert a3 and K. Wellard a2
a1 Formerly: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, ICRISAT-Malawi, P.O. Box 1096, Lilongwe, Malawi
a2 Bunda College of Agriculture, University of Malawi, P.O. Box 219, Lilongwe, Malawi
a3 Maize Commodity Team, Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation, Government of Malawi, P.O. Box 150, Lilongwe, Malawi

Abstract

In Malawi, intensive production of maize (Zea mays) is pursued on over 60% of smallholder land, yet application of nutrients is almost nil. To improve adoption of soil productivity-enhancing technologies, two participatory methods were pursued: (i) a novel ‘mother-and-baby’ trial design and (ii) participatory action research with communities in a southern Malawi watershed. The central ‘mother trial’ was managed by researchers (replicated within a site) and systematically linked to farmer-managed ‘baby’ trials to cross-check biological performance with farmer assessment. The watershed approach involved a partnership of researchers and farmers addressing soil management. Technologies tested in both approaches integrated legumes into existing maize-based systems, sometimes in combination with inorganic fertilizers. Across methods, legume intensification increased yields by approximately 40% (net benefit increase of approximately US$50 ha−1) and fertilizer increased yields by approximately 70% compared with continuous maize grain yields of about 1100 kg ha−1. Farmer assessment prioritized technologies that included secondary benefits, such as weed suppression, grain legume yields, and low-labour-demanding fertilizer. A survey indicated that participating researchers and extension staff had reservations about the amount of time required to interact with farmers, and no clear consensus emerged regarding the best approach. There has been wider adoption of the mother-and-baby trial method by scientists in neighbouring countries, indicating the value of systematically incorporating farmers' input.

(Accepted March 22 2002)


Correspondence:
c1 Corresponding author: Sieglinde Snapp, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. email: snapp@msu.edu; Fax # +1-517-432-2242.


back to top
Cambridge University Press