Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T21:00:14.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are Twins and Singletons Comparable? A Study of Disease-related and Lifestyle Characteristics in Adult Women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Toby Andrew*
Affiliation:
Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK. toby.andrew@kcl.ac.uk
Deborah J. Hart
Affiliation:
Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Harold Snieder
Affiliation:
Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Marlies de Lange
Affiliation:
Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Tim D. Spector
Affiliation:
Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Alex J. MacGregor
Affiliation:
Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
*
*Address for correspondence: T Andrew, Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, St Thomas Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The classic twin study is sometimes described as “the perfect natural experiment” for the investigation of the aetiology of complex disease, but assumptions of the twin design need to be empirically tested if their results are to be considered unbiased and representative of singleton populations. In this study comparisons of disease and prevalence of lifestyle characteristics have been made between twin participants in the St Thomas' Hospital UK adult twin registry, the largest twin volunteer register in the UK for the study of diseases of ageing, and a parallel population-based study of singleton women. The only differences found were for weight, where monozygotic (MZ) twins were lighter and had a smaller variance than dizygotic (DZ) twins and singletons. For the other variables studied, volunteer twins were not found to differ from age-matched singleton women in distribution or prevalence of: bone mineral density, osteoarthritis, blood pressure, hypertensive drug use, height, history of hysterectomy and ovariectomy, menopausal status and current alcohol and overall tobacco consumption. We conclude that the results of twin studies can be generalised to singleton populations for these measures and disease outcomes.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001